Research on fatigue life calculation method of droppers in high-speed railway catenary

  • Hongbo Kou orcid

    Infrastructure Inspection Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Co., Ltd, Beijing 100081, China

  • Yongming Yao orcid

    Infrastructure Inspection Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Co., Ltd, Beijing 100081, China

  • Haoshu Lu orcid

    Infrastructure Inspection Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Co., Ltd, Beijing 100081, China

  • Yunqian Ma orcid

    Postgraduate Department, China Academy of Railway Sciences Co., Ltd, Beijing 100081, China

Article ID: 4135
Keywords: catenary dropper; pantograph-catenary coupling system; fatigue load extrapolation; fatigue life calculation method

Abstract

To address the problems that catenary droppers are prone to fatigue failure under the operating environment of high-speed trains and are faced with the shortage of load measurement samples, insufficient extrapolation accuracy, and large dispersion in life evaluation, an optimized fatigue load extrapolation method based on small multiples and multiple iterations is proposed. Firstly, a pantograph-catenary coupling system model is established. After verification, the load-time history of the dropper is obtained through dynamic simulation. Secondly, the rainflow counting method is used to statistically analyze the stress cycles. The bandwidth and range of non-parametric rainflow extrapolation are determined according to the extrapolation multiple, and the reliable load extrapolation to the target multiple is realized through a multi-iteration strategy, which is compared with the traditional amplification method and the large-multiple direct extrapolation method. Finally, the mean stress is corrected based on the Goodman model, and a standard fatigue load spectrum is constructed. Combined with the S-N curve and linear cumulative damage theory, a fatigue life prediction model for high-speed railway droppers is established. This study provides a theoretical basis and data support for life evaluation, maintenance schedule formulation, and reliability design of catenary droppers.

Published
2026-07-22
How to Cite
Kou, H., Yao, Y., Lu, H., & Ma, Y. (2026). Research on fatigue life calculation method of droppers in high-speed railway catenary. Sound & Vibration, 60(4). https://doi.org/10.59400/sv4135
Section
Article

References

[1]Zeng S, Gao S, Yu L, et al. Analysis of External Environmental Operating Risk Factors for Overhead Contact System. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies for Rail Transportation (EITRT) 2023. Springer Nature; 2024. pp. 12–19. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-9315-4_2

[2]Pan L, Chen L, Xu Y, et al. Study on the Influence of Different Dropper Models in Pantograph–Catenary System on Dropper Load Simulation. Machines. 2025; 13(9): 874. doi: 10.3390/machines13090874

[3]Yang Z, Song Z, Zhao X, et al. Time-domain extrapolation method for tractor drive shaft loads in stationary operating conditions. Biosystems Engineering. 2021; 210: 143–155. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.08.020

[4]Huang HZ, Gong J, Zuo MJ, et al. Fatigue Life Estimation of an Aircaft Engine Under Different Load Spectrums. International Journal of Turbo & Jet-Engines. 2012; 29(4). doi: 10.1515/tjj-2012-0017

[5]Li Y, Wang Z, Chen YL, et al. Research on compiling fatigue load spectrum of individual aircraft and analysis of fatigue life based on flight data. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2012 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-2012 Beijing); 23–25 May 2012; Beijing, China. pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/PHM.2012.6228937

[6]Deng Z, Huang T, Huang H, et al. Study on Load Spectrum of Evolution Accelerated Test for Fatigue Spalling of Angular Contact Ball Bearings under Varying Working Conditions. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(13): 193–204. (in Chinese)

[7]Yuan Z, Chen X, Ma L, et al. A segmented load spectrum model for high-speed trains and its inflection stress as an indicator for line quality. International Journal of Fatigue. 2021; 148: 106221. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106221

[8]Zhang Z, Wu X, Wu S, et al. Investigation on Load Definition of Vibration Fatigue of Railway Vehicle Bogie. Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2024; 60(22): 311. doi: 10.3901/JME.2024.22.311

[9]Xian C, Zhang H, Kim Y, et al. Programmed system for fatigue life prediction of excavator turntables based on multi-body dynamics and finite element analysis. Heliyon. 2024; 10(12): e33126. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33126

[10]Fu L, Yu L, Yan D, et al. Fatigue Damage Prediction Framework of The Boom System Based on Embedded Physical Information and Attention Mechanism BiLSTM Neural Network. Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2024; 60(13): 205. doi: 10.3901/JME.2024.13.205

[11]Parzen E. On Estimation of a Probability Density Function and Mode. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 1962; 33(3): 1065–1076. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177704472

[12]Silverman BW. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, 1st ed. Routledge; 1998. doi: 10.1201/9781315140919

[13]Dressler K, Hack M, Krüger W. Stochastic Reconstruction of Loading Histories from a Rainflow Matrix. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics. 1997; 77(3): 217–226. doi: 10.1002/zamm.19970770315

[14]Wang J, Liu Y, Zeng X, et al. Selection Method for Kernel Function in Nonparametric Extrapolation Based on Multicriteria Decision-Making Technology. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2013; 2013: 1–11. doi: 10.1155/2013/391273

[15]Socie D, Pompetzki M. Modeling Variability in Service Loading Spectra. Journal of ASTM International. 2004; 1(2): 1–12. doi: 10.1520/JAI11561

[16]Zheng X, Gao S, Yu L, et al. Method for fatigue program load spectrum compilation of catenary droppers based on adaptive kernel density estimation. Railway Standard Design. 2026; 70(4): 188–195. https://doi.org/10.13238/j.issn.1004-2954.202407240003 (in Chinese)

[17]European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization. EN 50318:2018/A1:2022: Railway Applications - Current Collection Systems - Validation of Simulation of the Dynamic Interaction Between Pantograph and Overhead Contact Line. European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization; 2022. Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/clc/629314f1-88bd-4d6f-826e-3095fd5a39e1/en-50318-2018-a1-2022?srsltid=AfmBOop4QgsuM9J3mY7kdTMuJDRyofE5SHV-XRxjbXh0btij_7566eej

[18]American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). ASTM E1049-85: Standard Practices for Cycle Counting in Fatigue Analysis. ASTM International; 2017.

[19]Conover JC, Jaeckel HR, Kippola WJ. Simulation of Field Loading in Fatigue Testing. SAE Transactions. 1967; 75: 543–556. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/44563657

[20]Wang J, Chen H, Li Y, et al. A Review of the Extrapolation Method in Load Spectrum Compiling. Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2016; 62(1): 60–75. doi: 10.5545/sv-jme.2015.2905

[21]Yang X, Zhang J, Ren WX. Threshold selection for extreme strain extrapolation due to vehicles on bridges. Procedia Structural Integrity. 2017; 5: 1176–1183. doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.030

[22]Schröder V, Müller C, Esderts A. Extrapolation of load spectra by optimized Kernel Density Estimators using Monte-Carlo-Simulation. International Journal of Fatigue. 2021; 147: 106182. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106182

[23]Nasution FP, Sævik S, Berge S. Experimental and finite element analysis of fatigue strength for 300 mm2 copper power conductor. Marine Structures. 2014; 39: 225–254. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2014.07.005

[24]Mars WV. Computed Dependence of Rubber’S Fatigue Behavior on Strain Crystallization. Rubber Chemistry and Technology. 2009; 82(1): 51–61. doi: 10.5254/1.3557006

[25]Miner MA. Cumulative Damage in Fatigue. Journal of Applied Mechanics. 1945; 12(3): A159–A164. doi: 10.1115/1.4009458