Parametric sensitivity analysis of impact-induced vibration in revolving cannon systems using the PCE surrogate model
Abstract
To solve impact vibration problems brought by impacts between sliding plates and rotating chamber structures when revolver shooting processes go on, a parameterized dynamic model which includes gas-driven mechanisms and curved chamber contact relations has been constructed. The accuracy of the model has been verified by means of chamber pressure measurement experiments and high-speed photography experiments. For overcoming the computation restriction problems of high-precision simulated experiments, a sparse polynomial chaos expansion method has been utilized by us for building a high-accuracy substitute model. In combination with the Sobol global sensitivity analysis method, this research has quantitatively carried out an evaluation of the influence that eight key geometric and physical parameters exert upon maximum collision forces. Our results have shown that the elliptical long axis of recoil chambers is the main parameter that contributes 67.2% to the main effect; what comes next is the elliptical minor axis and linear sections, which have contribution proportions of 17.1% and 10.3% separately. Other parameters have demonstrated influences which can be ignored. The optimization model which is gotten from sensitivity analysis has decreased maximum contact forces by 29.73%, thus its validation errors are under 1% via high-fidelity modeling. This study provides a theoretical basis and efficient analytical tools for structural optimization and impact vibration suppression of turret-mounted guns.
Copyright (c) 2026 Junyu Shan, Ming Hu, Shuai Yue, Zhonghua Du, Zihao Wang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Zeng J, Yang G, Wang X. Dynamics simulation and analysis for a gun with consideration of contact between roller and raceway groove. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics 2007; 5–7 November 2007; Wuxi, China. pp. 1–8. (in Chinese)
[2]Gong Q, Chang Z, Dan B. Kinematics simulation and analysis of the roller-gear indexing cam mechanism based on Pro/e. Journal of Hubei Automotive Industries Institute. 2008; 22(1): 41–44. (in Chinese)
[3]Liu YS, He W. The Study on Dynamic Simulation of the Roller Gear Indexing Cam. Advanced Materials Research. 2012; 503–504: 44–47. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.503-504.44
[4]Foti P, Razavi N, Fatemi A, et al. Multiaxial fatigue of additively manufactured metallic components: A review of the failure mechanisms and fatigue life prediction methodologies. Progress in Materials Science. 2023; 137: 101126. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101126
[5]Wang H, Wu D, Wang F, et al. A method for determining the horizontal impact load based on the rotational speed of the aircraft’s wheel in a landing gear drop test. International Journal of Crashworthiness. 2018; 23(6): 627–634. doi: 10.1080/13588265.2017.1368121
[6]Chang X, Pan H, Xu J, et al. Study of Fault Identification of Clearance in Cam Mechanism. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(15): 7420. doi: 10.3390/app12157420
[7]Fedorko G, Molnár V, Blaho P, et al. Failure analysis of cyclic damage to a railway rail—A case study. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2020; 116: 104732. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104732
[8]Hu G, Jia C, Fang Y, et al. An experiment study on deterioration of dynamic rotational accuracy of motorized spindle. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021; 1948(1): 012131. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1948/1/012131
[9]Wu B, Zheng J, Luo TF, et al. Damage and fracture of gun barrel under wear-fatigue interaction. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020; 1507(10): 102034. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1507/10/102034
[10]Mukhtar A, Nasir H, Rashid B, et al. Development of zirconium and potassium perchlorate igniter for AP/HTPB composite propellant base bleed grain. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2019; 138(6): 3939–3947. doi: 10.1007/s10973-019-08317-2
[11]Fintová S, Kuběna I, Chlupová A, et al. Very high frequency induced fatigue damage. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics. 2024; 133: 104590. doi: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104590
[12]Li H, Zhao Y, Jiang J, et al. Effect of frequency on the fatigue performance of bolted joints under axial excitation. Tribology International. 2022; 176: 107933. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2022.107933
[13]Zhang P, Mi Z, Zhu Z. Stress test and fatigue analysis on flexible parts in cannon suspension device. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology. 2006; 30(4): 420–423. (in Chinese)
[14]Yeh JN. Simulation and application of automatic weapon transmission mechanism concept design. Journal of the Chinese Society of Mechanical Engineers. 2024; 45(1):11–21. (in Chinese)
[15]Vo BV, Macko M, Dao HM. Experimental Study of Automatic Weapon Vibrations when Burst Firing. Problems of Mechatronics Armament Aviation Safety Engineering. 2021; 12(4): 9–28. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.5984
[16]Vu TD, Prochazka S, Krist Z, et al. Influence of Gas Port on Forces and Their Impulses Acting in an Automatic Weapon. In: Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Military Technologies (ICMT); 8 June 2021; Brno, Czech Republic. pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/ICMT52455.2021.9502832
[17]Sui CJ, Cui B, Li JM, et al. Dynamics Simulation of Automatic Weapon Mechanisms and Their Impact on Shooting Accuracy. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Symposium on Ballistics; 19 May 2025; Jacksonville, FL, USA. doi: 10.12783/ballistics25/37152
[18]Li B, Zhang X. Modeling and optimization of projectile in-bore motion based on a coupled method of interior ballistic multiphase flow and launch dynamics. Physics of Fluids. 2025; 37(3): 033327. doi: 10.1063/5.0257296
[19]Balla J, Vitek R, Van DN, et al. Study of relationship between motion of mechanisms in gas operated weapon and its shock absorber. Defence Technology. 2024; 33: 42–54. doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2023.12.012
[20]Schulze M, Dietz S, Burgermeister B, et al. Integration of Nonlinear Models of Flexible Body Deformation in Multibody System Dynamics. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics. 2014; 9(1): 011012. doi: 10.1115/1.4025279
[21]Stavropoulos P, Gerontas C, Bikas H, et al. Multi-Body dynamic simulation of a machining robot driven by CAM. Procedia CIRP. 2022; 107: 764–769. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.059
[22]Zaal JJM, Van Driel WD, Kessels FJHG, et al. Correlating Drop Impact Simulations With Drop Impact Testing Using High-Speed Camera Measurements. Journal of Electronic Packaging. 2009; 131(1): 011007. doi: 10.1115/1.3068311
[23]Jayalakshmi V, Lakshmi K, Rao ARM. Dynamic force reconstruction techniques from incomplete measurements. Journal of Vibration and Control. 2018; 24(22): 5321–5344. doi: 10.1177/1077546317752709
[24]Nguyen P, Vo B, Dao D, et al. Studying the dynamic characteristics of gas-operated guns using Solidworks Motion software. Vojnotehnicki glasnik. 2024; 72(3): 1066–1092. doi: 10.5937/vojtehg72-50987
[25]Peherstorfer B, Willcox K, Gunzburger M. Survey of Multifidelity Methods in Uncertainty Propagation, Inference, and Optimization. SIAM Review. 2018; 60(3): 550–591. doi: 10.1137/16M1082469
[26]Neves Costa J, Ambrósio J, Andrade AR, et al. Safety assessment using computer experiments and surrogate modeling: Railway vehicle safety and track quality indices. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2023; 229: 108856. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108856
[27]Marelli S, Sudret B. UQLab: A Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in Matlab. In: Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risk. American Society of Civil Engineers; 2014. pp. 2554–2563. doi: 10.1061/9780784413609.257
[28]Iyengar N, Rajaram D, Mavris D. Empirical Assessment of Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos Expansions for High-Dimensional Stochastic CFD Problems. Aerospace. 2023; 10(12): 1017. doi: 10.3390/aerospace10121017
[29]Singh A, Wolf M, Jacobs G, et al. Machine learning based surrogate modelling for the prediction of maximum contact temperature in EHL line contacts. Tribology International. 2023; 179: 108166. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2022.108166
[30]Sudret B. Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2008; 93(7): 964–979. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.002
[31]Alexanderian A, Gremaud PA, Smith RC. Variance-based sensitivity analysis for time-dependent processes. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2020; 196: 106722. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106722
[32]Bhusal R, Subbarao K. Uncertainty Quantification Using Generalized Polynomial Chaos Expansion for Nonlinear Dynamical Systems With Mixed State and Parameter Uncertainties. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics. 2019; 14(2): 021011. doi: 10.1115/1.4041473
[33]Wei Z, Chen J, Jin G, et al. Research on Dynamic Analysis and Simulation of Cam Mechanism Considering Contact Collision. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Mechanical Engineering. 2024; 48(3): 1177–1190. doi: 10.1007/s40997-023-00703-4
[34]Corral E, Gismeros Moreno R, Meneses J, et al. Spatial Algorithms for Geometric Contact Detection in Multibody System Dynamics. Mathematics. 2021; 9(12): 1359. doi: 10.3390/math9121359
[35]Zhao R, Xie X, Yu W. Repair equipment allocation problem for a support-and-repair ship on a deep sea: A hybrid multi-criteria decision making and optimization approach. Expert Systems with Applications. 2020; 160: 113658. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113658
[36]Islam A, Belhaouari SB, Rehman AU, et al. KNNOR: An oversampling technique for imbalanced datasets. Applied Soft Computing. 2022; 115: 108288. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108288




