Fuzzy–chaotic modelling for nonlinear vibration systems under parameter uncertainty

  • Asokan Vasudevan orcid

    Faculty of Business and Communications, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia

  • Yogeesh Nijalingappa orcid

    Department of Mathematics, Government First Grade College, Tumkur 572102, India; Research Fellow, INTI International University, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia

  • Soon Eu Hui orcid

    Faculty of Business and Communications, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia

  • Zetty Pakir Mastan orcid

    Faculty of Engineering and Quantity Surveying, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia

  • Choo Wou Onn

    International Relations and Collaborations Centre, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia

  • Mohammed El Khider orcid

    Department of General Undergraduate Curriculum Requirements, University of Dubai, Dubai P.O. Box 14143, United Arab Emirates

Article ID: 4010
Keywords: nonlinear dynamics, fuzzy set theory, chaotic response, uncertainty propagation, Lyapunov indicators, nonlinear vibration modelling, numerical integration, dynamic testing uncertainty

Abstract

Chaotic responses arise in many nonlinear dynamical systems and can strongly influence practical engineering decisions when measurements, parameters, or operating conditions are imprecise. This paper presents a vibration-oriented fuzzy-parameter uncertainty framework in which uncertain parameters and initial conditions are represented by fuzzy numbers and propagated through a Lorenz-type nonlinear model by means of α-cuts. The novelty claimed here is not the introduction of fuzzy uncertainty itself, but the use of a single workflow that links α-cut propagation, response envelopes, and the interpretation of chaos-sensitive indicators for uncertainty-aware nonlinear vibration analysis. Conventional dynamical descriptors such as phase portraits, stability trends, and bifurcation-related behavior are therefore interpreted as bounded families of trajectories rather than as a single deterministic path. A numerical workflow based on standard time integration is outlined to generate response envelopes that quantify the sensitivity of the dynamics to imprecise inputs. As a basic consistency check, the framework reduces to the classical deterministic model when the fuzzy spreads vanish. The approach provides a mathematically tractable route to uncertainty-aware nonlinear dynamics, with clear relevance to vibration and noise engineering, where nonlinear oscillators, self-excited responses, and test-data uncertainty often coexist. Practical considerations for calibration and validation are also summarized.

Published
2026-07-22
How to Cite
Vasudevan, A., Nijalingappa, Y., Hui, S. E., Mastan, Z. P., Onn, C. W., & Khider, M. E. (2026). Fuzzy–chaotic modelling for nonlinear vibration systems under parameter uncertainty. Sound & Vibration, 60(4). https://doi.org/10.59400/sv4010
Section
Article

References

[1]Awrejcewicz J, Holicke MM. Smooth and Nonsmooth High Dimensional Chaos and the Melnikov-Type Methods, World Scientific Series on Nonlinear Science Series A. World Scientific; 2007. doi: 10.1142/6542

[2]Wei J, Jiang W. Stability and bifurcation analysis in Van der Pol’s oscillator with delayed feedback. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2005; 283(3–5): 801–819. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2004.05.014

[3]Huang T, Chen G, Kurths J. Synchronization of chaotic systems with time-varying coupling delays. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems—B. 2011; 15(4): 1071–1082. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.1071

[4]Zhou K, Wang Z, Gao Q, et al. Recent advances in uncertainty quantification in structural response characterization and system identification. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics. 2023; 74: 103507. doi: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2023.103507

[5]Xia Y, Ding L, Liu P, et al. Uncertainty Propagation for the Structures with Fuzzy Variables and Uncertain-but-Bounded Variables. Materials. 2023; 16(9): 3367. doi: 10.3390/ma16093367

[6]Hong G, Zhongmin D. Dynamic response analysis of nonlinear structures with hybrid uncertainties. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 2023; 119: 174–195. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2023.02.029

[7]Sánchez DE, Wasques VF, Arenas JP, et al. On interactive fuzzy solutions for mechanical vibration problems. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 2021; 96: 304–314. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2021.03.002

[8]Jena RM, Chakraverty S, Jena SK, et al. Analysis of time‐fractional fuzzy vibration equation of large membranes using double parametric based Residual power series method. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics. 2021; 101(4): e202000165. doi: 10.1002/zamm.202000165

[9]Jena SK, Pradyumna S, Chakraverty S. Quantifying uncertainty in free vibration characteristics of nanobeam with one variable first-order shear deformation theory: An analytical investigation. Acta Mechanica. 2024; 235(7): 4401–4416. doi: 10.1007/s00707-024-03955-6

[10]Lorenz EN. Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 1963; 20(2): 130–141. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020%3C0130:DNF%3E2.0.CO;2

[11]Ott E, Grebogi C, Yorke JA. Controlling chaos. Physical Review Letters. 1990; 64(11): 1196–1199. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.1196

[12]Boccaletti S. The control of chaos: Theory and applications. Physics Reports. 2000; 329(3): 103–197. doi: 10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00096-4

[13]Wolf A, Swift JB, Swinney HL, et al. Determining Lyapunov exponents from a time series. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 1985; 16(3): 285–317. doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(85)90011-9

[14]Kuznetsov YA. Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer; 2004. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3978-7

[15]Nayfeh AH, Mook DT. Nonlinear Oscillations, 1st ed. Wiley; 2008. doi: 10.1002/9783527617586

[16]Strogatz SH. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering, 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall; 2018. doi: 10.1201/9780429398490

[17]Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 1965; 8(3): 338–353. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

[18]Mamdani EH, Assilian S. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 1975; 7(1): 1–13. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2

[19]Mendel JM, John RIB. Type-2 fuzzy sets made simple. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2002; 10(2): 117–127. doi: 10.1109/91.995115

[20]Soize C. A nonparametric model of random uncertainties for reduced matrix models in structural dynamics. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics. 2000; 15(3): 277–294. doi: 10.1016/S0266-8920(99)00028-4

[21]Soize C. Random matrix theory for modeling uncertainties in computational mechanics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2005; 194(12–16): 1333–1366. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.06.038

[22]Soize C. A comprehensive overview of a non-parametric probabilistic approach of model uncertainties for predictive models in structural dynamics. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2005; 288(3): 623–652. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.07.009

[23]Kabir S, Papadopoulos Y. A review of applications of fuzzy sets to safety and reliability engineering. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 2018; 100: 29–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2018.05.005

[24]Fu C, Lu K, Yang Y, et al. Nonlinear Vibrations of an Uncertain Dual-Rotor Rolling Bearings System with Coupling Misalignment. Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics. 2022; 29(2): 388–402. doi: 10.1007/s44198-022-00044-x

[25]Xu K, Cheng T, Lopes AM, et al. Fuzzy Fractional-Order PD Vibration Control of Uncertain Building Structures. Fractal and Fractional. 2022; 6(9): 473. doi: 10.3390/fractalfract6090473

[26]Liu M, Lv J, Wu L, et al. Chaotic vibration control of an axially moving string of multidimensional nonlinear dynamic system with an improved FSMC. Scientific Reports. 2024; 14(1): 26495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77632-y

[27]Jena SK, Eremeyev VA, Reccia E, et al. Uncertainty quantification in free vibration of porous functionally graded micro-beams using double parametric form based Haar wavelet Discretization Method. Composite Structures. 2025; 372: 119600. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119600

[28]Wang L, Dai L, Sun L. ConvLSTM-based spatiotemporal and temporal processing models for chaotic vibration prediction of a microbeam. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation. 2025; 140: 108411. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2024.108411

[29]Li X, Sun L, Liu X, et al. Chaotic Vibration Prediction of a Laminated Composite Cantilever Beam. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(12): 6403. doi: 10.3390/app15126403