Comparative acoustic analysis of treated and untreated small recording rooms using vocal and room-response measurements

Korab  Shaqiri; Armend Xhoni; Xhevdet Gashi; Lulkaçela  Jashari

doi:10.59400/sv3828

Comparative acoustic analysis of treated and untreated small recording rooms using vocal and room-response measurements

Korab Shaqiri
Faculty of Music, University of Prishtina, Prishtina 10000, Kosovo
Armend Xhoni
Faculty of Education, University of Prishtina, Prishtina 10000, Kosovo
Xhevdet Gashi
Faculty of Modern Music, UBT College, Prishtina 10000, Kosovo
Lulkaçela Jashari
Faculty of Fashion Design, Evolution Academy, Prishtina 10000, Kosovo

Article ID: 3828

Keywords: room acoustics, reverberation time, clarity indices (C50, C80), sung vocal quality, spectrogram and formant analysis

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of small-room acoustics on sung vocal quality by comparing two adjacent recording environments of nearly identical dimensions: a professionally treated room (Room A) and an untreated room (Room B). Exponential sine-sweep measurements were conducted using calibrated studio equipment, and room impulse responses were analysed using reverberation metrics (EDT, Topt, RT60), clarity indices (C50, C80), definition (D50), modal behaviour, decay characteristics, and total harmonic distortion (THD). Room A incorporates broadband absorption at primary reflection points, corner bass trapping, rear-wall diffusion, and a double-layer wall structure for low-frequency damping. In addition to room-response measurements, three sustained sung vocal phrases were recorded in both rooms at microphone distances of 10, 30, and 60 cm and analysed using spectrograms and formant trajectories. The results reveal acoustic differences between the two environments. The untreated room exhibits prolonged mid-band decay times (Topt ≈ 1.3–1.9 s), elevated EDT values, reduced clarity (C80 between −5 and +8 dB), low definition (D50 ≈ 30–40%), strong low-frequency modal buildup, and increased harmonic masking. In contrast, the treated room shows studio-appropriate decay times (Topt ≈ 0.20–0.30 s), high clarity (C80 ≈ 15–25 dB), excellent definition (D50 ≈ 90–100%), and smooth decay behaviour. Time–frequency analysis of the vocal recordings confirms that acoustic treatment stabilises temporal and spectral response, yielding cleaner harmonic structure, sharper transient articulation, improved intelligibility, and greater formant precision across all microphone distances. These findings demonstrate the critical role of acoustic treatment in achieving reliable, high-fidelity vocal recordings in small-room environments.

Published

2026-02-05

How to Cite

Shaqiri, K., Xhoni, A., Gashi, X., & Jashari, L. (2026). Comparative acoustic analysis of treated and untreated small recording rooms using vocal and room-response measurements. Sound & Vibration, 60(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.59400/sv3828

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 60 No. 1 (2026)

Section

Article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

[1]Kaplanis N, Bech S, Jensen S, et al. Perception of reverberation in small rooms: A literature study. In: Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society (AES) 55th International Conference; 27–29 August 2014; Helsinki, Finland.

[2]Zahorik P. Spatial Hearing in Rooms and Effects of Reverberation. In: Litovsky RY, Goupell MJ, Fay RR, et al. (editors). Binaural Hearing, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research. Springer International Publishing; 2021. pp. 243–280. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-57100-9_9

[3]Barron M. Auditorium Acoustics and Architectural Design, 2nd ed. Spon Press; 2024.

[4]Neidhardt A, Schneiderwind C, Klein F. Perceptual Matching of Room Acoustics for Auditory Augmented Reality in Small Rooms—Literature Review and Theoretical Framework. Trends in Hearing. 2022; 26: 23312165221092919. doi: 10.1177/23312165221092919

[5]Kuttruff H. Room Acoustics, 6th ed. CRC Press; 2016.

[6]Blauert J. Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization (Revised Edition). The MIT Press; 1996. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/6391.001.0001

[7]Cecchi S, Carini A, Spors S. Room Response Equalization—A Review. Applied Sciences. 2017; 8(1): 16. doi: 10.3390/app8010016

[8]Zölzer U. DAFX: Digital Audio Effects, 1st ed. Wiley; 2011. doi: 10.1002/9781119991298

[9]Toole F. Sound Reproduction: The Acoustics and Psychoacoustics of Loudspeakers and Rooms, 1st ed. Focal Press; 2008.

[10]Kuttruff H. Room Acoustics, 4th ed. Spon Press; 2000.

[11]Sabine W. Collected Papers on Acoustics. Harvard University Press; 1922.

[12]Anderson N. Acoustic Characterization of Rooms Using Directional and Omnidirectional Sources [Bachelor’s Thesis]. Brigham Young University; 2022. pp. 2–3. Available online: https://brightspotcdn.byui.edu/d5/29/dba237634a4a80d523507798c5a1/nick-andersons22.pdf

[13]Newell P. Recording Studio Design. Routledge; 2008. doi: 10.4324/9780080556055

[14]Clarity Graph. Available online: https://www.roomeqwizard.com/help/help_en-GB/html/graph_clarity.html (accessed on 14 December 2025).

[15]Sato H, Bradley JS. Evaluation of acoustical conditions for speech communication in working elementary school classrooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2008; 123(4): 2064–2077. doi: 10.1121/1.2839283

[16]Mishan R, Fu X, Hingu C, et al. Analyzing frequency spectrum and Total Harmonic Distortion for high switching frequency operation of GaN-based filter-less multilevel cascaded H-bridge inverter. Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy. 2025; 11: 100906. doi: 10.1016/j.prime.2025.100906

[17]Sundberg J. The Science of the Singing Voice. Northern Illinois University Press; 1987.

[18]Lokki T, Pätynen J. Auditory Spatial Impression in Concert Halls. In: Blauert J, Braasch J (editors). The Technology of Binaural Understanding, Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing. Springer; 2020. pp. 173–202. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-00386-9_7

[19]Mi H. A Dynamic Reverberation Algorithm for Virtual Acoustic Rendering [Master’s Thesis]. University of York; 2023. Available online: https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/36366/

[20]Tao H, Li S, Wang X, et al. Analysis and Research on Spectrogram-Based Emotional Speech Signal Augmentation Algorithm. Entropy. 2025; 27(6): 640. doi: 10.3390/e27060640

[21]Goetze S, Albertin E, Kallinger M, et al. Quality assessment for listening-room compensation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing; 14–19 March 2010; Dallas, TX, USA. pp. 2450–2453. doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.2010.5496301

[22]Bottalico P, Codino J, Cantor-Cutiva LC, et al. Reproducibility of Voice Parameters: The Effect of Room Acoustics and Microphones. Journal of Voice. 2020; 34(3): 320–334. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.10.016

[23]How the song “Rrjedh në këngë e đegërime” was born—Gjok Beci told the story. Available online: https://observerkult.com/si-lindi-kenga-rrjedh-ne-kenge-e-ligjerime-gjok-beci-rrefen-historine-vid/ (accessed on 14 December 2025). (in Albanian)

[24]Stevens KN. Acoustic Phonetics. The MIT Press; 1999. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/1072.001.0001

[25]Shaqiri K, Mehmeti B, Xhoni A, et al. The face that speaks, the voice that sings: the triad of orthodontics, music, and aesthetics. Rast Müzikoloji Dergisi. 2025; 13(3): 283–305. doi: 10.12975/rastmd.20251333

[26]International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Acoustics — Measurement of Room Acoustic Parameters—Part 1: Performance Spaces (ISO 3382-1:2009). ISO; 2009. Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/11128de8-0d0b-4a88-9ed2-707914dd2648/iso-3382-1-2009

[27]Everest A, Pohlmann K. Master Handbook of Acoustics, 6th ed. McGraw-Hill; 2014.

[28]Vorländer M. Auralization: Fundamentals of Acoustics, Modelling, Simulation, Algorithms and Acoustic Virtual Reality, 1st edition. Springer; 2008. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-48830-9

[29]Cox T, D’Antonio P. Acoustic Absorbers and Diffusers Theory, Design and Application, 3rd ed. CRC Press; 2016.

[30]Eyring CF. Reverberation Time In “Dead” Rooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1930; 1(2A): 217–241. doi: 10.1121/1.1915175

[31]International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Acoustics—Measurement of Room Acoustic Parameters—Part 2: Reverberation Time in Ordinary Rooms. ISO; 2009.

[32]Yousef AM, Hunter EJ. Sensitivity of Acoustic Voice Quality Measures in Simulated Reverberation Conditions. Bioengineering. 2024; 11(12): 1253. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11121253

[33]Franz S, Grewe T, Meyer BT, et al. Measurement and Analysis of Relevant Room Acoustic Parameters in Speech and Language Therapy Rooms and Evaluation of Their Influence on Objective Voice Quality Metrics. Journal of Voice. 2026. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.12.012

This paper introduces a universal framework for understanding the vibration responses of systems subjected to harmonic excitation. By examining a simplified cylinder-spring-damper model, the study refurbishes traditional scaling methods for the excitation frequency ratio and critical damping ratio. The findings indicate that in damped systems, the maximum amplitude of vibration does not align with the natural frequency. This observation leads to the introduction of a new scaling method for reduced frequency. This new approach aligns resonance peaks at the new reduced velocity of 1.0 across different damping ratios, providing a consistent characterization of vibration behavior. A new critical damping ratio of 0.707 is identified for an excited system as opposed to the traditional damping ratio of 1.0 for an unexcited system. Key properties such as maximum amplitude, phase lag, bandwidth, and quality factor are analyzed, demonstrating that the proposed reduced frequency and critical damping ratio effectively capture the dynamics of both damped and undamped excited systems. The findings offer significant insights for practical applications in engineering and various scientific fields.

This study makes significant contributions to the field of ultrasonic testing (UT) by offering a novel approach to the identification of artificially introduced defects within Japanese cedar wood (Cryptomeria japonica). The findings are of particular relevance for the heritage conservation and construction sectors, where non-invasive defect detection is paramount. The study establishes a robust framework for assessing the structural integrity of timber by correlating ultrasonic wave velocity reductions with defect size and distribution. Big-sized defects led to more substantial decreases in wave velocity. The study establishes a robust framework for assessing the structural integrity of historical timber by correlating ultrasonic wave velocity reductions with defect size and distribution. This framework has the potential to be applicable to diverse wood species and defect types.

The control of vehicle interior noise has become a critical metric for assessing noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH) in vehicles. During the initial phases of vehicle development, accurately predicting the impact of road noise on interior noise is essential for reducing noise levels and expediting the product development cycle. In recent years, data-driven methods based on machine learning have gained significant attention due to their robust capability in navigating complex data mapping relationships. Notably, surrogate models have demonstrated exceptional performance in this domain. Numerous researchers have integrated diverse intelligent algorithms into the study of vehicle noise, leveraging advantages such as the elimination of precise modeling requirements, extensive solution space exploration, continuous learning from data, and robust algorithmic versatility. However, in NVH engineering applications, data-driven models face inherent limitations, particularly in interpretability and stability. To address these issues, this paper introduces an improved Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network that combines knowledge and data. Inspired by the physical information neural network concept, this approach incorporates values calculated through empirical formulas into the neural network as constraints. Comparative assessments with traditional LSTM networks highlight the advantages of this deep learning model. By integrating empirical formulas constraints, the model not only enhances interpretability but also achieves robust generalization with fewer data samples. The proposed method is validated on a specific vehicle model, showing significant improvements in prediction accuracy and efficiency.