Application of 3D-DIC in seismic response analysis of graphite core structures
Abstract
This study introduces and validates the application of the three-dimensional digital image correlation (3D-DIC) technique for the seismic assessment of graphite core structures in horizontal Micro-High-Temperature Gas-cooled Reactors (MHTGRs). Addressing a critical gap in conventional instrumentation, the non-contact 3D-DIC method was employed to capture the full-field vibrational response of individual graphite blocks within a loosely stacked core assembly under simulated seismic excitation. A full-scale reactor core model, comprising 31 discrete graphite blocks, was subjected to multi-axis seismic loading on a six-degree-of-freedom shaking table. The displacement-time histories and frequency-domain responses of each block were simultaneously measured using 3D-DIC and compared directly with data from traditional accelerometers. The 3D-DIC technique effectively eliminated the mass-loading and cable interference artifacts inherent in wired sensor arrays and captured the full field information of the graphite core structures. Comparative analysis in both time and frequency domains demonstrated amplitude correlations within ±10% between the two measurement methods. The results confirm that 3D-DIC provides a robust, high-fidelity, and non-invasive alternative for capturing complex, full-field structural dynamics in modular reactor cores. This work establishes a novel methodological framework for the seismic safety evaluation of advanced reactor designs and offers significant insights for enhancing structural health monitoring protocols in nuclear energy applications, thereby contributing to improved seismic resilience and operational safety of future high-temperature gas-cooled reactors.
Copyright (c) 2026 Tianbao LAN, Zimin Zhan, Siqi Zhu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Shropshire D, Black G, Araújo K. Global market analysis of microreactors. Idaho National Laboratory; 2021. doi: 10.2172/1806274
[2]Nuclear Energy Agency. Small modular reactors: challenges and opportunities. OECD/NEA; 2021. doi: 10.1787/18fbb76c-en
[3]International Atomic Energy Agency. Advances in small modular reactor technology developments: A supplement to IAEA advanced reactors information system (ARIS). IAEA; 2020.
[4]Lan T, Peng X, Sheng F, et al. Seismic modeling and simulation of the graphite core in gas-cooled micro-reactor. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2025; 431: 113714.
[5]Ahmed K, Stojko S. The non-linear seismic response of AGR core graphite brick slices: Correlation of experimental and analytical results. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 1987; 15(2): 159–188.
[6]Ikushima T. SONATINA-2H: A Computer Program for Seismic Analysis of the Two-Dimensional Horizontal Slice HTGR Core. Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute; 1990.
[7]Theymann W, Kemter F, Schmidt G. Seismic behavior of the core structure in a medium-sized HTR. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology; 22–27 August 1989; Anaheim, CA, USA.
[8]Sun L, Shi L, Wang H, et al. Seismic study on double-layer model of HTR graphite core structure. Atomic Energy Science and Technology. 2012; 46(S2): 839–844.
[9]Lai S, Sun L, Shi L, et al. Seismic test and analysis on HTR-PM side-reflector structure similarity model. Atomic Energy Science and Technology. 2016; 50(4): 691–697.
[10]Tian Q, Sun L, Wang H, et al. Seismic tests and analysis of HTR graphite single column model. Nuclear Power Engineering. 2012; 33(2): 42–46.
[11]Wang H, Sun L, Wang H, et al. Experimental study on dynamic collision of nuclear graphite bricks. The International Conference on Computational & Experimental Engineering and Sciences. 2011; 17(1): 9–10.
[12]Kemter F, Schmidt G. Seismic behaviour of the pebble bed in an HTR plant. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology; 19–23 August 1985; Brussels, Belgium.
[13]Kleine-Tebbe K A, Kemter F. Seismic behavior of the core cavern of a HTGR with pebble bed core. In: Proceedings of the IAEA IWGGCR Specialists' Meeting on Gas-Cooled Reactor Seismic Design Problems and Solutions; 30 August–1 September 1982; San Diego, CA, USA. pp. 119–132.
[14]Ikushima T, Honma T, Ishizuka H. Seismic research on block-type HTGR core. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 1982; 71(2): 195–215.
[15]Iyoku T, Inagaki Y, Shiozawa S, et al. Seismic study of high-temperature engineering test reactor core graphite structures. Nuclear Technology. 1992; 99(2): 158–168.
[16]Ikushima T. Seismic Study on High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Core. Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute; 1991.
[17]Ikushima T, Honma T. Seismic response of high temperature gas-cooled reactor core with block-type fuel (II): Three-dimensional vibration characteristics of stacked block column. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 1980; 17(9): 655–667.
[18]Ikushima T, Honma T. Seismic response of high temperature gas-cooled reactor core with block-type fuel (III): Vibration experiment of two-dimensional vertical slice core model. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 1981; 18(7): 514–524.
[19]Olsen BE, Neylan AJ, Gorholt W. Seismic test on a one-fifth scale HTGR core model. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 1976; 36(3): 355–365.
[20]Ni ZS, Sun LB, Wu XX. Research on the application of wireless acceleration sensors in graphite core structure seismic experiment. Nuclear Power Engineering. 2014; 35(1): 170–173.
[21]Voyagaki E, Kloukinas P, Dietz M, et al. Earthquake response of a multiblock nuclear reactor graphite core: Experimental model vs simulations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 2018; 47(13): 2601–2626.
[22]Dihoru L, Oddbjornsson O, Kloukinas P, et al. The development of a physical model of an advanced gas cooled reactor core: Outline of the feasibility study. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2017; 323: 269–279.
[23]Gokce T, White RE, Crewe AJ, et al. Seismic response prediction using intensity measures: Graphite nuclear reactor core model case study. Earthquake Spectra. 2023; 39(4): 1992–2018.
[24]Lan T, Long B, Peng X, et al. A study on the seismic test of a planar model of the gas-cooled microreactor. Nuclear Engineering and Technology. 2025; 58(2): 103984.
[25]Parsi SS, Whittaker AS, Sivaselvan MV, et al. Experimental investigations into the rocking response of graphite-block assemblies in a HTGR core under horizontal earthquake shaking. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2025; 443: 114300.
[26]Khanahmadi M. A cutting-edge framework for damage-sensitive feature extraction leveraging modal dynamic flexibility in signal processing-driven structural health monitoring. Thin-Walled Structures. 2025; 216(A): 113617.
[27]Khanahmadi M, Mirzaei B, Amiri GG, et al. A mode shape sensitivity-based wavelet feature extraction method for interface debonding detection in concrete-filled steel tubes. Measurement Science and Technology. 2024; 36(1): 016137.
[28]Lan T, Feng T, Huang Z, et al. A preliminary study on seismic analysis of graphite cores for gas-cooled microreactor. Nuclear Techniques. 2025; 48(10): 100003.




