Acoustical simulation and optimization in Mosques
Abstract
This article discusses the assessment and optimization of speech intelligibility in the Grand Mosque in Makkah. It is the most iconic Islamic site in the world. Most of the surface material used is marble, which is considered to be a highly sound reflective material. Acoustic measurement of the current conditions (with a surface area of 85,000 m²) was conducted. A virtual model was used to obtain an optimum acoustical solution. The measurement and inspection of ambient acoustical data were conducted using the EASERA measuring tool, and as a result, late energy arrival (after 100 ms) was noticed; this forms echoes and decreases intelligibility. It was also noticed that the measured background noise levels were as high as 90 dB (A). High temperature and humidity degrade the quality of the ambient acoustical environment. A virtual model for the targeted areas (Massa roof and adjacent perimeter) was created using EASE simulation software. Mapping results showed a high level of intelligibility (0.6) and homogenous distribution of the sound pressure level (SPL) (max. variation 9 dB). Loudspeaker columns minimized late energy arrival. The “active” approach improved the ambient acoustical environment in the targeted area and eliminated the necessity of an expensive “passive treatment”.
Copyright (c) 2025 Wasim Orfali

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Eldien HH. Evaluation of the influence of Mihrab shape on sound quality in Mosques. Journal of Engineering Research. 2025; 13(3): 2293–2307. doi: 10.1016/j.jer.2024.06.002
[2]Jones D. Sound of Worships: A Handbook of Acoustics and Sound System Design for the Church. Elsevier; 2011.
[3]Abdou AA. Measurement of acoustical characteristics of mosques in Saudi Arabia. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2003; 113(3): 1505–1517. doi: 10.1121/1.1531982
[4]Hamadah HA, Hamouda HM. Assessment of speech intelligibility in large auditoria case study: Kuwait State Mosque. Applied Acoustics. 1998; 54(4): 273–289. doi: 10.1016/s0003-682x(97)00095-9
[5]Sudarsono AS, Sarwono J, Zakri KW, et al. The perception of sound quality in a mosque. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2019; 2088(1): 050007. doi: 10.1063/1.5095341
[6]Eldien HH. Effect of dome-shape on the reverberation time of the mosque—A case study. Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2023; 11(4): 1749–1775.
[7]Ahnert W, Feistel S, Olson B. Experience with in situ measurements using Electronic and Acoustic System Evaluation and Response Analysis (EASERA). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2007; 121: 3030. doi: 10.1121/1.4781650
[8]Adelman‐Larsen NW, Thompson ER. The importance of bass clarity in pop and rock venues. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2008; 123(5): 3090. doi: 10.1121/1.2932922
[9]Aydin A, Tavukcuoglu A, Caliskan M. Assessment of acoustical characteristics for historical baths (Hammams). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2008; 123(5): 3605. doi: 10.1121/1.2934781
[10]EASERA Users Manual. Available online: https://www.afmg.eu/sites/default/files/2021-09/EaseraManual.pdf (accessed on 30 August 2024).
[11]Ahnert W, Steffen F. Sound Reinforcement Engineering. CRC Press; 2000.
[12]Sert F, Karaman Ö. An investigation on the effects of architectural features on acoustical environment of historical Mosques. Acoustics. 2021; 3(3): 559–580. doi: 10.3390/acoustics3030036
[13]Gracey & Associates. The Sound and Vibration Instrument Hire and Calibration Specialists. CEL 593 Real Time Sound Analyser. Available online: https://www.gracey.co.uk/descriptions/cel-593-d1.htm (accessed on 30 August 2024).
[14]Aleshkin VM, Schirjetsky C, Subbotkin AO. Estimating sound absorption coefficient of prayers in Mosques. Akustika. 2019; 32: 227–230.
[15]Houtgast T, Steeneken H, Plomp R. Predicting speech intelligibility in rooms from the modulation transfer function. Part I: General room acoustics. Acustica. 1980; 46(1): 60–72.
[16]Feistel S, Goertz A. Digitally steered columns: Comparison of different products by measurement and simulation. In: Proceedings of the 135th International AES Convention; 17–20 October 2013; New York, NY, USA.
[17]EASE 4.4 User's Manual. Available online: https://www.afmg.eu/en/ease-44-users-manual (accessed on 30 August 2024).
[18]Hassall JR, Zaveri K. Acoustic Noise Measurements. Brüel & Kjaer; 1979.
[19]IC16-8-RN Digitally Steerable Line Array Loudspeaker Systems. Available online: https://www.renkus-heinz.com/product_detail/ic16-8-rn/ (accessed on 2 December 2021).
[20]Loudspeaker User's Manual. Available online: https://renkus-heinz.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/rh508-ls-usersmanual-oct2017-web-1.pdf (accessed on 2 December 2021).
[21]Cai Y, Wu M, Yang J. Sound reproduction in personal audio systems using the least-squares approach with acoustic contrast control constraint. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2014; 135: 734–741. doi: 10.1121/1.4861341
[22]Choi JW, Kim YH. Generation of an acoustically bright zone with an illuminated region using multiple sources. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2002; 111: 1695–1700. doi: 10.1121/1.1456926
[23]Ballou G. Handbook for Sound Engineers. Elsevier; 2008.
[24]Schroeder MR. Modulation transfer function: Definition and measurements. Acustica. 1981; 49(3): 179–182.
[25]Gül ZS, Xiang N, Çalışkan M. Investigations on sound energy decays and flows in a monumental mosque. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2016; 140(1): 344–355. doi: 10.1121/1.4953691
[26]Alfian NN, Kanu R, Mohammed MA. Speech intelligibility evaluation of small-scale mosque with multiple domes design. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation. 2025; 43(7): 1741–1761. doi: 10.1108/IJBPA-03-2024-0051




