Architecture design and implementation for sensing equipment faults from ultra-weak acoustic emission signals

  • Li'an Lu Tongji University, Shanghai 201800, China
  • Guangyu Liu Tongji University, Shanghai 201800, China
  • Hui Xiao Tongji University, Shanghai 201800, China
  • Xuefeng Li Tongji University, Shanghai 201800, China
Article ID: 2757
Keywords: acoustic emission detection; low signal-to-noise ratio; stacked auto-encoder; convolutional neural network; Mel time-frequency spectrum

Abstract

In acoustic emission (AE) detection, the weakness of the acoustic source signal, the interference from background noise, and the attenuation during signal propagation result in the sensor-received signal being completely submerged by noise, severely impacting downstream fault identification and anomaly analysis. This study focuses on the fault detection scenario of AE signals characterized by a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). It uses low-loss noise reduction and Mel-frequency spectrum transformation for preprocessing, then extracts features with an optimized stacked auto-encoder combined with CNN (OSAE-CNN) innovatively. These features are input into an SVM for fault classification. The proposed method significantly improves fault identification accuracy to 91.38% for signals with an SNR of −20 dB, a 30% increase over the previous method. The research findings can provide technical support for the fault monitoring and safe operation of electromechanical equipment and also offer empirical references for ultra-weak signal processing in various domains.

Published
2025-04-24
How to Cite
Lu, L., Liu, G., Xiao, H., & Li, X. (2025). Architecture design and implementation for sensing equipment faults from ultra-weak acoustic emission signals. Sound & Vibration, 59(2), 2757. https://doi.org/10.59400/sv2757
Section
Article

References

[1]Faizol Z, Zubir F, Saman NM, et al. Detection method of partial discharge on transformer and gas-insulated switchgear: A review. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(17): 9605.

[2]Prajna K, Mukhopadhyay CK. Fractional Fourier transform based adaptive filtering techniques for acoustic emission signal enhancement. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation. 2020; 39(1): 14.

[3]Gu FC. Identification of partial discharge defects in gas-insulated switchgears by using a deep learning method. IEEE Access. 2020; 8: 163894–163902.

[4]Hussain GA, Hassan W, Mahmood F, et al. Review on partial discharge diagnostic techniques for high voltage equipment in power systems. IEEE Access. 2023; 11: 51382–51394.

[5]Sun W, Ma H, Wang S. A Novel Fault Diagnosis of GIS Partial Discharge Based on Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm. IEEE Access. 2024.

[6]Ji H, Liu H, Wang J, et al. Mechanical fault diagnosis of gas-insulated switchgear based on saliency feature of auditory brainstem response under noise background. Measurement Science and Technology. 2023; 35(1).

[7]Li D, Wang Y, Yan WJ, Ren WX. Acoustic emission wave classification for rail crack monitoring based on synchrosqueezed wavelet transform and multi-branch convolutional neural network. Structural Health Monitoring. 2021; 20(4): 1563–1582.

[8]Lv F, Liu G, Wang Q, et al. Pattern recognition of partial discharge in power transformer based on infogan and cnn. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology. 2023; 18(2): 829–841.

[9]Wang Z, Zhao Y, Guo J, et al. Partial discharge pattern recognition in gis based on s transform denoising. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering (ISH 2021); 21–26 November 2021; Xi’an, China. pp. 897–901.

[10]Chaudhuri S, Ghosh S, Dey D, et al. Denoising of partial discharge signal using a hybrid framework of total variation denoising-autoencoder. Measurement. 2023; 223: 113674.

[11]Lin Q, Lyu F, Yu S, et al. Optimized denoising method for weak acoustic emission signal in partial discharge detection. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation. 2022; 29(4): 1409–1416.

[12]Gu FC, Chen HC, Chen BY. A fractional Fourier transform-based approach for gas-insulated switchgear partial discharge recognition. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology. 2019; 14: 2073–2084.

[13]Zheng J, Chen Z, Wang Q, et al. GIS partial discharge pattern recognition based on time-frequency features and improved convolutional neural network. Energies. 2022; 15(19): 7372.

[14]Sun W, Ma H, Wang S. Application of SCNGO-VMD-SVM in Identification of Gas Insulated Switchgear Partial Discharge. IEEE Access. 2024; 12: 43838–43848.

[15]Lyu F, Yang Z, Wang L, et al. Behavior anomaly detection fused with features of Mel frequency cepstrum coefficients. In: Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Sensing, Measurement & Data Analytics in the era of Artificial Intelligence (ICSMD); 15–17 October 2020; Xi’an, China. pp. 89–93.

[16]Lu L, Tao W, Liu G, et al. Effectiveness Analysis of the Mel spectrum features of AE signals in the detection of partial discharge faults. In: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Sensing, Measurement & Data Analytics in the era of Artificial Intelligence (ICSMD); 30 November–2 December 2022; Harbin, China. pp. 1–5.

[17]Liu T, Yan J, Wang Y, et al. GIS partial discharge pattern recognition based on a novel convolutional neural networks and long short-term memory. Entropy. 2011; 23(6): 774.

[18]Jing Q, Yan J, He R, et al. Intelligent diagnosis of GIS partial discharge via stacked autoencoder and transfer learning. In: Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Electric Power Equipment-Switching Technology (ICEPE-ST); 15–18 March 2022; Seoul, Korea.

[19]Tian J, Song H, Sheng G, Jiang X. Knowledge-driven recognition methodology of partial discharge patterns in GIS. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. 2021; 37(4): 3335–3344.

[20]Rauscher A, Kaiser J, Devaraju M, Endisch C. Deep learning and data augmentation for partial discharge detection in electrical machines. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2024; 133: 108074.

[21]Gao A, Zhu Y, Cai W, Zhang Y. Pattern recognition of partial discharge based on VMD-CWD spectrum and optimized CNN with cross-layer feature fusion. IEEE Access. 2020; 8: 151296–151306.