Influence of parameter changes on honeycomb structure debonding detection based on band gap method
Abstract
Honeycomb structures have been widely used in many industrial fields due to their excellent properties. However, it is always challenging to rapidly and accurately detect defects such as debonding in the structure, especially in the in-service situation. In response to this, we have proposed an acoustic testing method without coupling agents based on the acoustic band gap feature in the structure. However, the influence of test parameters such as signal excitation and reception on the band gap feature has not been comprehensively and thoroughly investigated, and the parameters have not been optimized. In this paper, the transmission frequency response (TFR) curves were measured, and the band gap features were investigated at different parameters. The results demonstrated that the band gap feature changes a little with the pressure between the probes and the specimen, the amplitude of the exciting signal, the sweep duration, and the detection direction. While it changes significantly with the exciting-receiving distance. Experimental results demonstrated that to form a stable band gap feature, the wave should propagate through at least three honeycomb unit widths before being received. Further analysis indicates that the defect resolution of the proposed method is about two honeycomb unit widths. This work can be used to select the proper detection parameters and further improve the reliability and efficiency of this technique.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ye Yuan, Bin Liu, Chengyou Lei, Zhiguo Zhang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Wang Z. Recent advances in novel metallic honeycomb structure. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2019; 166: 731–741. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.011
[2]Qi C, Jiang F, Yang S. Advanced honeycomb designs for improving mechanical properties: A review. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2021; 227: 109393. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109393
[3]Zhang Q, Yang X, Li P, et al. Bioinspired engineering of honeycomb structure—Using nature to inspire human innovation. Progress in Materials Science. 2015; 74: 332–400. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.05.001
[4]Yuan Y, Liu B, Sha Z, et al. Zero group velocity feature in CFRP-Nomex honeycomb structure and its use for debonding detection. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2024; 216: 111479. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111479
[5]Růžek R, Lohonka R, Jironč J. Ultrasonic C-Scan and shearography NDI techniques evaluation of impact defects identification. NDT & E International. 2006; 39(2): 132–142. doi: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.07.012
[6]Zhang H, Liu S, Rui X, et al. A skin-core debonding quantitative algorithm based on hexagonal units reconstruction for air-coupled ultrasonic C-scan images of honeycomb sandwich structure. Applied Acoustics. 2022; 198: 108964. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108964
[7]Kolkoori S, Wrobel N, Zscherpel U, et al. A new X-ray backscatter imaging technique for non-destructive testing of aerospace materials. NDT & E International. 2015; 70: 41–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.09.008
[8]Rellinger T, Underhill PR, Krause TW, et al. Combining eddy current, thermography and laser scanning to characterize low-velocity impact damage in aerospace composite sandwich panels. NDT & E International. 2021; 120: 102421. doi: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102421
[9]Zhao H, Zhou Z, Fan J, et al. Application of lock-in thermography for the inspection of disbonds in titanium alloy honeycomb sandwich structure. Infrared Physics & Technology. 2017; 81: 69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.infrared.2016.12.020
[10]Sikdar S. Multi-level nondestructive analysis of joint-debond effects in sandwich composite structure. Polymer Testing. 2019; 80: 106149. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106149
[11]Gao F, Wang L, Hua J, et al. Application of Lamb wave and its coda waves to disbond detection in an aeronautical honeycomb composite sandwich. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2021; 146: 107063. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107063
[12]Abdulaziz AH, Hedaya M, Elsabbagh A, et al. Acoustic emission wave propagation in honeycomb sandwich panel structures. Composite Structures. 2021; 277: 114580. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114580
[13]Sikdar S, Mirgal P, Banerjee S, et al. Damage-induced acoustic emission source monitoring in a honeycomb sandwich composite structure. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2019; 158: 179–188. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.071
[14]Ma B, Zhou Z, Zhao H, et al. Characterisation of inclusions and disbonds in honeycomb composites using non-contact non-destructive testing techniques. Insight—Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring. 2015; 57(9): 499–507. doi: 10.1784/insi.2015.57.9.499
[15]Yuan Y, Liu B, Jia H, et al. A novel nondestructive testing method for honeycomb structure using acoustic band gap. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2023; 188: 110053. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.110053
[16]Wang B, Zhong S, Lee TL, et al. Non-destructive testing and evaluation of composite materials/structures: A state-of-the-art review. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. 2020; 12(4). doi: 10.1177/1687814020913761
[17]Asif M, Khan MA, Khan SZ, et al. Identification of an effective nondestructive technique for bond defect determination in laminate composites—A technical review. Journal of Composite Materials. 2018; 52(26): 3589–3599. doi: 10.1177/0021998318766595
[18]Hungler PC, Bennett LGI, Lewis WJ, et al. Neutron imaging inspections of composite honeycomb adhesive bonds. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. 2011; 651(1): 250–252. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2011.01.104
[19]Liu G, Gao W, Liu W, et al. Debonds and Water-Filled Defects Detection in Honeycomb Sandwich Composites Based on Pulse Infrared Thermography NDT Technique. Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing. 2023; 59(5): 583–591. doi: 10.1134/S1061830923600089
[20]Thomas BP, Annamala Pillai S, Narayanamurthy CS. Investigation on vibration excitation of debonded sandwich structures using time-average digital holography. Applied Optics. 2017; 56(13): F7. doi: 10.1364/AO.56.0000F7
[21]Towsyfyan H, Biguri A, Boardman R, et al. Successes and challenges in non-destructive testing of aircraft composite structures. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. 2020; 33(3): 771–791. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2019.09.017
[22]Lu MH, Feng L, Chen YF. Phononic crystals and acoustic metamaterials. Materials Today. 2009; 12(12): 34–42. doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(09)70315-3
[23]Hussein MI, Leamy MJ, Ruzzene M. Dynamics of Phononic Materials and Structures: Historical Origins, Recent Progress, and Future Outlook. Applied Mechanics Reviews. 2014; 66(4): 040802. doi: 10.1115/1.4026911
[24]Maldovan M. Sound and heat revolutions in phononics. Nature. 2013; 503(7475): 209–217. doi: 10.1038/nature12608
[25]Meidani M, Kim E, Li F, et al. Tunable evolutions of wave modes and bandgaps in quasi-1D cylindrical phononic crystals. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2015; 334: 270–281. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2014.09.010
[26]Zen N, Puurtinen TA, Isotalo TJ, et al. Engineering thermal conductance using a two-dimensional phononic crystal. Nature Communications. 2014; 5(1): 3435. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4435
[27]Yang S, Page JH, Liu Z, et al. Ultrasound Tunneling through 3D Phononic Crystals. Physical Review Letters. 2002; 88(10): 104301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.104301
[28]Shen M, Cao W. Acoustic band-gap engineering using finite-size layered structures of multiple periodicity. Applied Physics Letters. 1999; 75(23): 3713–3715. doi: 10.1063/1.125438
[29]Al Ba’ba’a H, Nouh M, Singh T. Formation of local resonance band gaps in finite acoustic metamaterials: A closed-form transfer function model. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2017; 410: 429–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.08.009
[30]Zouari S, Genevaux JM, Brocail J, et al. Band gap formation in thin plates with a periodic array of resonators. Mechanics & Industry. 2017; 18(3): 304. doi: 10.1051/meca/2016062
[31]Yuan Y, Liu B, Jia H, et al. Observation of uncommon elastic wave group velocity in common honeycomb structure and its potential for debonding detection. Applied Physics Letters. 2025; 126(2): 022202. doi: 10.1063/5.0237493




