A Raspberry Pi-based digital stethoscope: Advancing real-time heart and lung sound diagnostics with IoT and machine learning integration
Abstract
Digital transformation is reshaping auscultation by moving the stethoscope from a purely acoustic instrument to an intelligent, data-driven diagnostic platform. This review critically examines Raspberry Pi 3-based digital stethoscope technologies for heart and lung sound monitoring, with an emphasis on system architecture, sensor integration, signal acquisition, real-time processing, storage, playback, and connectivity. The paper synthesizes current designs and implementation strategies, highlighting how low-cost embedded platforms can improve the repeatability, accessibility, and objectivity of cardiopulmonary assessment compared with conventional acoustic stethoscopes. Particular attention is given to technical performance factors, including filtering, signal-to-noise ratio, latency, audio distortion, noise suppression, and time-frequency analysis, which are essential for detecting clinically significant acoustic features such as heart murmurs, crackles, and wheezes. The review also identifies key limitations affecting clinical translation, including power consumption, device portability, casing size, environmental noise, hardware constraints, and the need for robust validation in real-world settings. Future directions include optimized embedded processing, wireless and IoT-enabled tele-auscultation, cloud-assisted data management, and machine learning models for automated classification and decision support. Overall, Raspberry Pi 3-based digital stethoscopes represent a promising pathway toward affordable, scalable, and clinically meaningful cardiopulmonary monitoring, particularly for point-of-care, remote, and resource-limited healthcare environments. By integrating acoustic sensing, edge computing, and intelligent analytics, these systems can strengthen diagnostic workflows and support the next generation of connected digital healthcare.
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurul Azwaani Salehuddin Haqe, R Kanesaraj Ramasamy, Sivasutha Thanjappan, Shamsuriani Md Jamal, Faizal Amri Hamzah, Venushini Rajendran

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Ismail S, Siddiqi I, Akram U. Localization and classification of heart beats in phonocardiography signals—A comprehensive review. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing. 2018; 2018(1): 26. doi: 10.1186/s13634-018-0545-9
[2]Zhou L, Marzbanrad F, Ramanathan A, et al. Acoustic analysis of neonatal breath sounds using digital stethoscope technology. Pediatric Pulmonology. 2020; 55(3): 624–630. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24633
[3]Elphick HE. Validity and reliability of acoustic analysis of respiratory sounds in infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2004; 89(11): 1059–1063. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.046458
[4]Oliveira A, Marques A. Respiratory sounds in healthy people: A systematic review. Respiratory Medicine. 2014; 108(4): 550–570. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.01.004
[5]Park H, Wei Q, Lee S, et al. Novel Design of a Multimodal Technology-Based Smart Stethoscope for Personal Cardiovascular Health Monitoring. Sensors. 2022; 22(17): 6465. doi: 10.3390/s22176465
[6]Zhang X, Maddipatla D, Narakathu BB, et al. Development of a Novel Wireless Multi-Channel Stethograph System for Monitoring Cardiovascular and Cardiopulmonary Diseases. IEEE Access. 2021; 9: 128951–128964. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3111778
[7]Rao A, Huynh E, Royston TJ, et al. Acoustic Methods for Pulmonary Diagnosis. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. 2019; 12: 221–239. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2018.2874353
[8]Li SH, Lin Bor-Shing, Tsai CH, et al. Design of Wearable Breathing Sound Monitoring System for Real-Time Wheeze Detection. Sensors. 2017; 17(1): 171. doi: 10.3390/s17010171
[9]Vinay NA, Vidyasagar KN, Rohith S, et al. An RNN-Bi LSTM Based Multi Decision GAN Approach for the Recognition of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) From Heart Beat Sound: A Feature Optimization Process. IEEE Access. 2024; 12: 65482–65502. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3397574
[10]Mohamed N, Kim HS, Mohamed M, et al. Tablet-Based Wearable Patch Sensor Design for Continuous Cardiovascular System Monitoring in Postoperative Settings. Biosensors. 2023; 13(6): 615. doi: 10.3390/bios13060615
[11]Nowak JK, Nowak R, Radzikowski K, et al. Automated Bowel Sound Analysis: An Overview. Sensors. 2021; 21(16): 5294. doi: 10.3390/s21165294
[12]Dellinger RP, Parrillo JE, Kushnir A, et al. Dynamic Visualization of Lung Sounds with a Vibration Response Device: A Case Series. Respiration. 2008; 75(1): 60–72. doi: 10.1159/000103558
[13]Topal T, Polat H, Güler İ. Software Development for the Analysis of Heartbeat Sounds with LabVIEW in Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease. Journal of Medical Systems. 2008; 32(5): 409–421. doi: 10.1007/s10916-008-9146-8
[14]Hernandez W, De Vicente J, Sergiyenko O, et al. Improving the Response of Accelerometers for Automotive Applications by Using LMS Adaptive Filters. Sensors. 2009; 10(1): 313–329. doi: 10.3390/s100100313
[15]Shervegar VM. A robust sliding window adaptive filtering technique for phonocardiogram signal denoising. Expert Systems. 2025; 42(1): e13361. doi: 10.1111/exsy.13361
[16]Hua J, Li J, Jiang Y, et al. Skin-Attachable Sensors for Biomedical Applications. Biomedical Materials & Devices. 2023; 1(1): 256–268. doi: 10.1007/s44174-022-00018-z
[17]Gupta P, Moghimi MJ, Jeong Y, et al. Precision wearable accelerometer contact microphones for longitudinal monitoring of mechano-acoustic cardiopulmonary signals. npj Digital Medicine. 2020; 3(1): 19. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0225-7
[18]Priyadarshi A, Tracy M, Kothari P, et al. Comparison of simultaneous auscultation and ultrasound for clinical assessment of bowel peristalsis in neonates. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2023; 11: 1173332. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1173332
[19]Oktivasari P, R. Amy HS, Freddy H, et al. Study and Analysis of Electronic Stethoscope Signal Using MATLAB & LabVIEW as Effective Tools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020; 1505(1): 012054. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1505/1/012054
[20]Gavriely N, Nissan M, Rubin AH, et al. Spectral characteristics of chest wall breath sounds in normal subjects. Thorax. 1995; 50(12): 1292–1300. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.12.1292
[21]Ghael HD, Solanki L, Sahu G. A Review Paper on Raspberry Pi and its Applications. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM). 2008; 2: 225. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348993428_A_Review_Paper_on_Raspberry_Pi_and_its_Applications
[22]Sachdeva P, Katchii S. A Review Paper on Raspberry Pi. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology. 2014; 4(6): 3818–3819. Available online: https://inpressco.com/a-review-paper-on-raspberry-pi/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
[23]Mathe SE, Pamarthy AC, Kondaveeti HK, et al. A Review on Raspberry Pi and its Robotic Applications. In: Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing (AISP); 12–14 February 2022; Vijayawada, India. pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/AISP53593.2022.9760590
[24]Patnaikuni DRP. A Comparative Study of Arduino, Raspberry Pi and ESP8266 as IoT Development Board. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science. 2017; 8(5). Available online: https://www.ijarcs.info/index.php/Ijarcs/article/view/3959
[25]Sanjaya R, Wibhowo C. Arduino, Raspberry Pi, and Smartphone Usage Comparison for Voice-based Virtual Assistant. In: Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Information Technology (InCIT); 10–11 November 2022; Nonthaburi, Thailand. pp. 293–297. doi: 10.1109/InCIT56086.2022.10067741
[26]Mahdi SM, Al-Obaidi MAM, Mahdi RH. Comparative study of Arduino Types and Raspberry Pi with Programming Languages. Journal La Multiapp. 2023; 3(5): 250–255. doi: 10.37899/journallamultiapp.v3i5.740
[27]Ooko SO. A Comparison of Arduino, Raspberry Pi and ESP8266 Boards. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337707190 (accessed on 6 August 2024).
[28]Pail PA. Exploring Sensor with Raspberry Pi and Arduino: A Comparative Analysis. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science. 2023; 5(4).
[29]Meenakshi U, Lakshmaiah D, Bilvika B. Design And Implementation Of Raspberry Pi 3 Based Embedded System For Analysis Of Soil Parameters. International Journal of Engineering Research and Application (IJERA). 2017; 7: 34–39.
[30]Patil PN. A comparative analysis of Raspberry pi Hardware with Adruino, Phidgets, Beaglebone black and Udoo. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2016; 3(6): 1595–1600. Available online: https://www.irjet.net/archives/V3/i6/IRJET-V3I6299.pdf




