Risk assessments of contaminants of environmental concern need to address future scenarios to effectively protect human health and ecosystems

Denis Moledo de Souza  Abessa

doi:10.59400/jts1970

Risk assessments of contaminants of environmental concern need to address future scenarios to effectively protect human health and ecosystems

Denis Moledo de Souza Abessa Biosciences Institute, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, São Paulo State University - UNESP, São Vicente, SP, 11330-900, Brazil

Article ID: 1970

62 Views

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/jts1970

Keywords: environmental risk assessment; human health risk assessment; aquatic pollution; ecotoxicology; chemicals regulation; CECs

Abstract

This article intends to discuss some limitations of the current approaches used to assess human health and environmental risks caused by contaminants of emerging concern (CECs). Human health and environmental risk assessments of CECs are normally based on a relationship between measured and predicted environmental concentrations (MECs and PECs, respectively) often estimated based on past conditions, and the respective predicted no-effect concentrations (PNECs). However, for most of chemicals, emissions continue to increase following the population growth and increasing polluting activities, resulting in a continuous rise of contaminants concentrations in the environmental compartments and the consequent increase of risks associated with them. Therefore, risk predictions based on past data may be unreliable and ineffective to support actions aimed to protect the environment, particularly in developing countries where pollutants monitoring are lacking or regulations are based on few academic studies. In this context, new tools need to be incorporated to improve the risk assessment protocols. Projections of future scenarios may predict the environmental concentrations of chemicals, allowing decision makers to establish appropriate actions to control the emissions and avoid the emergence of risks to human health and ecosystems before critical conditions are achieved. Thus, effective policies to control pollution and its effects would be taken.

References

[1]Rands MRW, Adams WM, Bennun L, et al. Biodiversity Conservation: Challenges Beyond 2010. Science. 2010; 329(5997): 1298-1303. doi: 10.1126/science.1189138

[2]Haas PM. Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control. International Organization. 1989; 43(3): 377-403. doi: 10.1017/s0020818300032975

[3]USEPA. Framework for ecological risk assessment. USEPA; 1992.

[4]USEPA. Guidelines for Human Exposure Assessment. USEPA; 2019.

[5]ASTM. Standard Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action. ASTM; 2015.

[6]European Commission. Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment In support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for new notified substances. European Commission; 2003.

[7]Puri M, Gandhi K, Kumar MS. Emerging environmental contaminants: A global perspective on policies and regulations. Journal of Environmental Management. 2023; 332: 117344. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117344

[8]FAO. FAOSTAT - Pesticide Indicators. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/EP/visualize (accessed on 29 June 2022).

[9]Wang F, Xiang L, Sze-Yin Leung K, et al. Emerging contaminants: A One Health perspective. The Innovation. 2024; 5(4): 100612. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100612

[10]Vane CH, Kim AW, Lopes dos Santos RA, et al. Contrasting sewage, emerging and persistent organic pollutants in sediment cores from the River Thames estuary, London, England, UK. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2022; 175: 113340. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113340

[11]Carr B, Masqué P, Alonso-Hernández CM, et al. Trends of legacy and emerging organic contaminants in a sediment core from Cienfuegos Bay, Cuba, from 1990 to 2015. Chemosphere. 2023; 328: 138571. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138571

[12]CETESB. Qualidade das águas interiores no estado de São Paulo 2022. CETESB; 2023.

[13]Montagner C, Sodré F, Acayaba R, et al. Ten Years-Snapshot of the Occurrence of Emerging Contaminants in Drinking, Surface and Ground Waters and Wastewaters from São Paulo State, Brazil. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society; 2018.

[14]Zini LB, Gutterres M. Chemical contaminants in Brazilian drinking water: a systematic review. Journal of Water and Health. 2021; 19(3): 351-369. doi: 10.2166/wh.2021.264

[15]Marson EO, Paniagua CES, Gomes Júnior O, et al. A review toward contaminants of emerging concern in Brazil: Occurrence, impact and their degradation by advanced oxidation process in aquatic matrices. Science of The Total Environment. 2022; 836: 155605. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155605

[16]Jardim WF, Montagner CC, Pescara IC, et al. An integrated approach to evaluate emerging contaminants in drinking water. Separation and Purification Technology. 2012; 84: 3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.06.020

[17]Naidu R, Arias Espana VA, Liu Y, et al. Emerging contaminants in the environment: Risk-based analysis for better management. Chemosphere. 2016; 154: 350-357. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.068

[18]Chidanand B, Yerukola P. Triclosan Market Size, Share, Competitive Landscape and Trend Analysis Report by Type, by End-use Industry: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2021-2031. Available online: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/triclosan-market-A06405 (accessed on 9 January 2024).

Published

2024-12-27

How to Cite

Abessa, D. M. de S. (2024). Risk assessments of contaminants of environmental concern need to address future scenarios to effectively protect human health and ecosystems. Journal of Toxicological Studies, 3(1), 1970. https://doi.org/10.59400/jts1970

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): (In publishing)

Section

Perspective

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Insecticides represent the most used control method against the insect pests of stored food products. But there are strains of insects which are resistant to these insecticides: it is the case of the beetle of the chickpea Callosobruchus maculatus . The present study has for objective the evaluation of the biological activity of chitinolytic enzymes extracted from the fish offals Scorpaena scrofa (scorpion fish) on this beetle at different doses (3%, 6%, 9%, 12%, 15% and 21%) prepared with the buffer solution. The results obtained from three treatments (T 1 , T 2 and T 3 ) realized according to the dose of the crude enzyme and the time of exposure were compared with those of the controls and have showed a very significant efficiency of our crude enzyme on the reduction of the fertility rate of 100% by treating the couple (T 1 ) at the same time as to treat the male (T 3 ) and the female (T 2 ) separately with the strongest dose (21%) for 48 h of exposure. It would be thus desirable to demonstrate the activity of these enzymes in the real conditions of storage.

Na + -K + -ATPase is a membrane bound enzyme responsible for the transport of ions through the membrane and immediate release of energy. This enzyme is known to be an early target for oxygen radical induced damage to intact cell. Exposure of C. punctatus to subacute concentrations of lindane for 96 h caused significant reduction in the activities of Na + -K + -ATPase in all the tissues of the fish tested; brain being maximally affected and the heart being least affected organ at the highest concentration of lindane (0.1 mg/L). The effect of pesticide was concentration dependent. The percent decrease in the activity of Na + -K + -ATPase in brain, gills, heart, kidney, liver and muscle was found to be 36.7, 23.4, 19.2, 29, 22.9 and 29.7, respectively. The order of level of enzyme activity recorded was as following: liver > gills > kidney > brain > muscle > heart in the control.

Due to the ubiquitous occurrence in the aquatic environment and terrestrial ecosystem and underlying eco-environmental risks, nano/microplastics (NPs/MPs) have sparked great public concerns. The purpose of this work is aimed to summarize the harmful influence of NPs/MPs on reproduction and offspring health and further explore the potential mechanisms of action, thereby facilitating the more comprehensive understanding of NPs/MPs features. Literature search databases included EMBASE, Web of Science, and PubMed. The study selection and data extraction were implemented according to the inclusion criteria. NPs/MPs could accumulate and trigger reproductive toxic responses and thereafter generate deleterious effects on the offspring health. Accordingly, the reproductive toxicity of NPs/MPs was characterized as the sperm deformity, decline in sperm count and motility, follicular growth tardiness, ovarian fibrosis, granulosa cell death, disorder of reproductive hormone secretion, as well as the fetal growth restriction, glycolipid metabolism disorder, and inflammatory responses of the next generation. Additionally, mechanism research revealed that NPs/MPs exposure brought about inflammatory responses and oxidative stress and thereafter, destroyed the blood-testis barrier (BTB) integrity, motivated spermatogenic cell apoptosis by activating the JNK and p38/MAPK-Nrf2/NF-κB pathways, and induced ovarian granulosa cell pyroptosis and apoptosis and subsequent ovarian fibrosis via the Wnt/β-Catenin and NLRP3/Caspase-1 pathways. Nevertheless, this work also highlighted the imperative requirements for scientific and systematic risk assessments of NPs/MPs, so as to identify the feasible risk mitigation strategies.