Harmonization of cross-border contract law: Legal solutions in a globalized world
Abstract
The harmonization of law is an essential tool to address the regulatory challenges arising from globalization and the increase in international commercial transactions. This phenomenon focuses on creating consistent legal frameworks that reduce conflicts of laws and transaction costs while improving legal certainty. From its emergence in the 19th century with the intent to revive the Lex Mercatoria to the advancements made in the 20th century through institutions like UNIDROIT and UNCITRAL, harmonization has evolved as a flexible mechanism promoting normative integration without imposing absolute unification of legal systems. This process is particularly relevant in dynamic areas such as cross-border contract law, where legislative diversity hinders the effectiveness of contractual and economic relationships. However, harmonization faces significant challenges in sensitive areas such as family law and labor law, where cultural and political factors play a central role. Despite these difficulties, its adaptable nature allows states and individuals to adjust legal instruments according to specific needs. This paper analyzes the historical evolution, fundamental characteristics, and contemporary challenges of legal harmonization, highlighting its role as an effective response to regulatory conflicts in a globalized environment. It concludes that harmonization not only fosters international cooperation but also strengthens global economic development by providing practical and balanced legal solutions tailored to the demands of an increasingly interconnected trade landscape.
References
[1]Carrascosa González JC. Globalization and Private International Law in the 21st Century (Spanish). 2004; (22):17–58.
[2]Esplugues Mota C, Iglesias Buhigues JL, Palao Moreno G. Private International Law, 12th ed (Spanish). Tirant lo Blanch; 2018, pp. 99–100.
[3]De Miguel Asensio PA. Private international law in the face of globalization (Spanish). Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional Privado. 2001; (I): 37–87.
[4]Wang S, Jiang X, Khaskheli MB. The Role of Technology in the Digital Economy’s Sustainable Development of Hainan Free Trade Port and Genetic Testing: Cloud Computing and Digital Law. Sustainability. 2024; 16(14): 6025. doi: 10.3390/su16146025
[5]Rodríguez Fernández M. Introduction to International Trade Law, 2nd ed (Spanish). Universidad Externado de Colombia; 2016. pp. 96–98.
[6]Jimenez WG. Globalization of Law. Legal Aspects and Human Rights (Spanish). Nova et Vetera. 2011; 20(64): 17–28. doi: 10.22431/25005103.166
[7]Fernández Ruiz J. The Entrepreneurial State (Spanish). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 1982. p. 28.
[8]De León Armenta L.P. The methodology of scientific research in law (Spanish). Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de México. 1996; (205–206): 69.
[9]Fernández Rozas JC. The Processes of International Unification of Private Law: Legal Techniques and Assessment of Results (Spanish). In: García Collantes JM (editor). La unificación jurídica en Europa. Seminario organizado por el Consejo General del Notariado en la UIMP. Civitas; 1999. pp. 17–58.
[10]Goldring J. “Unification and Harmonisatton” of the Rules of Law. Federal Law Review. 1978; 9(3): 284–325. doi: 10.1177/0067205x7800900302
[11]Bonilla Aldana JM. Harmonization of law, concept and criticisms of its implementation (Spanish). Revist@ e–Mercatoria. 2013; 12(2): 139–170.
[12]Bermúdez Abreu Y. Some considerations on the harmonization of International Private Law (Spanish). Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas. 2008; (116): 139–170.
[13]Eiselen S. Globalization and harmonization of international trade law. In: Faure M, Van der Walt A (editors). Globalization and Private Law: The Way Forward. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2010. pp. 97–104.
[14]Oliva Blázquez F. Comparative law as a tool for the unification and international harmonization of contract law (Spanish). Anuario de Derecho Civil. 2021; LXXIV(IV): 1100–1115. doi: 10.26349/adc.v74i4.8405
[15]Edlund H. The Concept of Unification and Harmonization. In: Fogt MM (editor). Unification and Harmonization of International Commercial Law: Interaction or Deharmonization?. Wolters Kluwer; 2012. pp. 8–32.
[16]Calderón Marenco EA, Castro Marcenaro D. Uniformity or harmonization of international trade law (Spanish)? Revista de Derecho. 2018; (25): 22–43. doi: 10.5377/derecho.v0i25.7420
[17]Cordini NS. The harmonization of criminal law: treaty crimes and Argentine criminal law (Spanish). Revista Direito GV. 2023; 19. doi: 10.1590/2317-6172202340
[18]Blanco Alvarado C. Legislative harmonization as a conflict resolution instrument in the Andean Community (Spanish). Prolegómenos. 2021; 24(47): 133–145. doi: 10.18359/prole.5616
[19]Robles Farías D. Towards uniformity in international contract law (Spanish). Revista Perspectiva Jurídica UP. 2018; (10): 143–147.
[20]Oviedo Albán J. The principles of European contract law: general aspects and formation of the contract (Spanish). Revista Foro de Derecho Mercantil. 2004; (4): 86–88.
[21]CNUDMI. UNCITRAL Guide: Basic Facts and Functions of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (Spanish). Naciones Unidas; 2013, pp.15–20.
[22]Lerner P. On harmonization, comparative law and the relationship between the two (Spanish). Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado. 2004; (111): 950–953.
Copyright (c) 2024 Emmanuel Guillermo Carreño Bernal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that the authors are given credit. With this license, authors hold the copyright.
