Facing emergency remote language teaching: The attitudes and competences of future EFL teachers
Abstract
The COVID-19 or Coronavirus health emergency brought about disruptions that highlighted the need to adapt education, especially language education, to secure students’ learning process. In this light, new terms, such as Emergency Remote Language Teaching, arose to differentiate ‘traditional’ online education from what was done in classrooms when schools were closed during the pandemic. Teachers directed their efforts to guarantee the continuity of students’ learning, which has been reflected in the increase in the number of studies examining how they have coped with this situation. In relation to the teaching and learning of English, however, there is limited research, up to the researchers’ knowledge, that explores whether teachers feel prepared to teach in Emergency Remote Language Teaching situations. Therefore, this paper studies the attitudes of Spanish future teachers of English concerning their readiness and abilities for Emergency Remote Language Teaching situations. Findings show that participants have positive attitudes towards adapting content to Emergency Remote Language Teaching, giving appropriate feedback, and selecting proper assessment methods. Moreover, they consider their training at university has been appropriate. Finally, recommendations to include strategies for Emergency Remote Language Teaching in teacher training syllabi are provided.
References
[1]Benson, R., & Brack, C. (2010). Online Learning and Assessment in Higher Education. Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781780631653
[2]Can, I., & Silman-Karanfil, L. (2022). Insights into emergency remote teaching in EFL. ELT Journal, 76(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccab073
[3]Çankaya, S., Durak, G. (2020). Integrated Systems in Emergency Distance Education: The Microsoft Teams. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 14(2), 889–920. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.827595
[4]Carius AC. (2020). Teaching practices in mathematics during COVID-19 Pandemic: challenges for technological inclusion in a rural Brazilian school. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 72(1), 35–43.
[5]Casillas Martín, S., Cabezas González, M., & García Peñalvo, F. J. (2019). Digital competence of early childhood education teachers: attitude, knowledge and use of ICT. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(2), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1681393
[6]Çebi, A., & Reisoğlu, İ. (2020). Digital Competence: A Study from the Perspective of Pre-service Teachers in Turkey. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(2), 294. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.583
[7]Cheung, A. (2021). Language Teaching during a Pandemic: A Case Study of Zoom Use by a Secondary ESL Teacher in Hong Kong. RELC Journal, 54(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220981784
[8]Crick, T. (2021). Covid-19 and Digital Education: A Catalyst for Change? ITNOW, 63(1), 16–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/itnow/bwab005
[9]Fenwick, M., McCahery, J. A., & Vermeulen, E. P. M. (2021). Will the World Ever Be the Same After COVID-19? Two Lessons from the First Global Crisis of a Digital Age. European Business Organization Law Review, 22(1), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-020-00194-9
[10]Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online Learning and Emergency Remote Teaching: Opportunities and Challenges in Emergency Situations. Societies, 10(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040086
[11]Foulger, T, Graziano, K, Schmidt-Crawford, D, Slykhuis, D. (2017). Teacher educator technology competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 413–448.
[12]García-Aretio, L. (2021). COVID-19 and digital distance education: Preconfinement, confinement and postconfinement. RIED (Spanish). Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(1), 09. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.28080
[13]García-Vélez, KA, Ortiz-Cárdenas, T, Chávez-Loor, MD. (2021). Relevance and mastery of digital competencies of teachers in higher education (Spanish). Revista Cubana de Educación Superior, 40(3), e20.
[14]García-Zabaleta, E., Sánchez-Cruzado, C., Santiago Campión, R., & Sánchez-Compaña, T. (2021). Digital competence and training needs of early childhood education teachers. A study before and after Covid-19 (Spanish). EDUTEC. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 76, 90–108. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2021.76.2027
[15]Girón Escudero, V., Cózar Gutiérrez, R., & González-Calero Somoza, J. A. (2019). Analysis of the self-perception of the level of digital competence of teachers in initial teacher training (Spanish). Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación Del Profesorado, 22(3), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.373421
[16]Graham, C. R., Borup, J., Pulham, E., & Larsen, R. (2019). K–12 Blended Teaching Readiness: Model and Instrument Development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1586601
[17]Haktanir, A., Watson, J. C., Ermis-Demirtas, H., Karaman, M. A., Freeman, P. D., Kumaran, A., & Streeter, A. (2018). Resilience, Academic Self-Concept, and College Adjustment Among First-Year Students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 23(1), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025118810666
[18]Hart, J. (2021). Top 150 tools for education 2021. Results of the 15th annual survey. Top 150 Tools for Education 2021. Available online: https://bit.ly/2ZB3FNF (accessed on 4 December 2023).
[19]Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., et al. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. Available online: https://bit.ly/2DwKOYM (accessed on 4 December 2023).
[20]Huertas-Abril, C. A. (2020). Telecollaboration in Emergency Remote Language Learning and Teaching. 2020 Sixth International Conference on E-Learning (Econf). https://doi.org/10.1109/econf51404.2020.9385425
[21]Huertas-Abril, C. A., Palacios-Hidalgo, F.J., Gómez-Parra, M.E. (2021). Designing materials for emergency remote language teaching contexts: A qualitative study of pre-service teachers’ experiences. TESL-EJ, 25(2), 1–18.
[22]Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Palacios-Hidalgo, F. J. (2022). Spanish Pre-Service EFL Teachers’ Perceptions of Emergency Remote Language Teaching. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(4), ep390. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12525
[23]Karaman, M.A., Vela, J.C., Aguilar, A.A., et al. (2019). Psychometric properties of U.S.-Spanish versions of the grit and resilience scales with a latinx population. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 41(1), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-018-9350-2
[24]Lama, A.V. (2020). The importance of digital skills in education in the COVID-19 era. In: Hajrizi E (editor), Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference International Conference Education and Development. UBT – Higher Education Institution. pp. 178–184.
[25]Lisa, A., Faridi, A., Bharati, D. A. L., & Saleh, M. (2021). A TPACK-in Practice Model for Enhancing EFL Students’ Readiness to Teach with Ed-Tech Apps. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 15(17), 156. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i17.23465
[26]Miao, F., Huang, R., Liu, D., Zhuang, R. (2020). Ensuring effective distance learning during COVID-19 disruption. Guidance for teachers. UNESCO. Available online: https://bit.ly/3hoSNZF (accessed on 4 December 2023).
[27]Naputi-Rivera, M. (2021). Perceptions of six ESL elementary teachers employing culturally responsive educational technology to increase reading and academic success of ELLs in Guam [PhD thesis]. Northcentral University.
[28]Nguyen, T.K. and Nguyen, T.H.T. (2021). The acceptance and use of video conferencing for teaching in Covid-19 pandemic: An empirical study in Vietnam. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 12(5), 1–16.
[29]Palacios-Hidalgo, F. J., & Huertas-Abril, C. A. (2021). The Potential of English for Social Purposes and Cooperation for Emergency Remote Language Teaching. Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, 68–90. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6922-1.ch004
[30]Paris, D. C. (2021). Normal? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 53(2), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2021.1883968
[31]Phellas, C.N., Bloch, A., & Seale, C. (2011). Structured methods: Interviews, questionnaires and observation. In: Seale C (editor). Researching society and culture. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage. pp. 181–205.
[32]Pozo-Sánchez, S., López-Belmonte, J., Fernández-Cruz, M., & López-Núñez, J.A. (2020). Correlational analysis of the factors affecting the level of digital competence of teachers (Spanish). Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.396741
[33]Pulham, E., & Graham, C. R. (2018). Comparing K-12 online and blended teaching competencies: a literature review. Distance Education, 39(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1476840
[34]Rahim, M. N., & Chandran, S. S. C. (2021). Investigating EFL Students’ Perceptions on E-learning Paradigm-Shift During Covid-19 Pandemic. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 3(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v3i1.5949
[35]Rando Burgos, E. (2021). The necessary training of university professors in the face of virtual teaching (Spanish). Revista Jurídica de Investigación e Innovación Educativa (REJIE Nueva Época), 24, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.24310/rejie.2021.vi24.12137
[36]Rathert, S., & Ağçam, R. (2022). Learning at Risk? Language Teaching Under Emergency Remote Conditions. Pedagogika, 146(2), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2022.146.2
[37]Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of asynchronous learning networks, 7(1), 68–88.
[38]Ritchie, H., Mathieu, E., Rodés-Guirao, L., et al. (2020). Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). Our World in Data. Available omline: https://bit.ly/3pCXbsh (accessed on 4 December 2023).
[39]Rodríguez-Alayo, A.O., & Cabell-Rosales, N.V. (2021). Importance of teachers’ digital competence in social confinement (Spanish). Polo del Conocimiento, 6(1), 1091–1109. https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v6i1.2210
[40]Sintema, E. J. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 on the Performance of Grade 12 Students: Implications for STEM Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7893
[41]Sokal, R.R., & Rohlf, F.J. (2015). Biometry: Principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 4th ed. New York, NY, US: W. H. Freeman.
[42]Torras Virgili, M. E. (2021). Emergency Remote Teaching: ICT applied to education during confinement by COVID-19 (Spanish). Innoeduca. International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, 7(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2021.v7i1.9079
[43]Trust, T., Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199.
[44]UNESCO & IESALC. (2020). COVID-19 and higher education: Today and tomorrow. Impact analysis, policy responses and recommendations. UNESCO & IESALC. Available online: https://bit.ly/48GmM7w (accessed on 4 December 2023).
[45]UNESCO. (2021). When schools shut. Gendered impacts of COVID-19 school closures. Paris, France: UNESCO. Available omline: https://bit.ly/32waYrs (accessed on 4 December 2023).
[46]Whittle, C., Tiwari, S., Yan, S., & Williams, J. (2020). Emergency remote teaching environment: a conceptual framework for responsive online teaching in crises. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-04-2020-0099
[47]Wintemute, D. (2021). Synchronous vs. asynchronous classes: What’s the difference? The Best Schools. Available online: https://bit.ly/3lDmsAj (accessed on 4 December 2023).
[48]Xiao, J. (2021). Decoding new normal in education for the post-COVID-19 world: Beyond the digital solution. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 16(1), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4818369
[49]Zweig, J.S., Stafford, E.T. (2016). Training for online teachers to support student success: Themes from a survey administered to teachers in four online learning programs. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(4), 399–418.
Copyright (c) 2024 Francisco Javier Palacios-Hidalgo, Cristina A. Huertas-Abril
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author(s) warrant that permission to publish the article has not been previously assigned elsewhere.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher right for the first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under:
OA - Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows for the copying, distribution and transmission of the work, provided the correct attribution of the original creator is stated. Adaptation and remixing are also permitted.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access to, as well as the unrestricted reuse of, original works of all types.
_%E5%89%AF%E6%9C%AC1.png){kind=logo}
