Effects of exposure to L2 input and language proficiency on pragmatic competence during study abroad
Abstract
Developing second language pragmatic competence is crucial because it enables learners to effectively communicate and interact with native speakers of that language. It goes beyond mere grammatical and lexical knowledge, and encompasses the ability to comprehend and produce language in a way that is contextually appropriate and respectful. The quantitative study and group interviews were conducted to investigate the effects of exposure to L2 input and language proficiency on the comprehension and expression of indirect speech acts of 180 Chinese learners of English in Malaysia. The results showed that exposure to L2 input significantly contributed to learners’ pragmatic competence at all levels; interactive and instructive exposure to L2 input was more beneficial to the pragmatic improvement; pragmatic competence did not develop in parallel with language proficiency, and increased significantly only after language proficiency reached the intermediate level; pragmatic expression was more influenced by exposure to L2 input, while pragmatic comprehension was more significantly influenced by language proficiency.
References
[1]Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
[2]Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 223-259. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588114
[3]Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Stringer, D. (2017). Unconventional Expressions: Productive Syntax in the L2 Acquisition of Formulaic Language. Second Language Research, 33(1), 61-90. doi: 10.1177/0267658316640788
[4]Freed, B. (1990). Language Learning in a Study Abroad Context: The Effects of Interactive and Non-interactive Out-of-class Contact on Grammatical Achievement and Oral Proficiency. Georgetown University Press.
[5]Foote, J. A., Trofimovich, P., Collins, L., & Urzúa, F. V. (2021). Effects of study abroad and exposure to L2 input on L2 Spanish phonetic development: A longitudinal investigation of learners in a homestay context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(1), 1-28.
[6]Han, Z. H., & Huang, L. Y. (2020). Differential effects of length of residence on the acquisition of English grammar and vocabulary. Applied Linguistics, 41(3), 362-386.
[7]Hartshorne, J. K., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Pinker, S. (2018). A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition, 177, 263-277.
[8]Hernandez, E., Bodet, J. P., Gehm, K., & Shen, S. (2018). What does a critical period for second language acquisition mean? Cognition.
[9]He, Z., & Ran, Y. (2009). Introduction to Language Use Studies (Chinese). Peking University Press.
[10]Jiang, X., & Kim, Y. (2019). The role of input frequency and type in L2 pragmatic development: Evidence from Chinese learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(1), 99-126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311800006X
[11]Kim, S., & Lantolf, J. P. (2018). The effect of L2 input on L2 pragmatic development: A longitudinal study of Korean learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 39(2), 168-192. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx026
[12]Kim, Y. J. (2015). The impact of language proficiency on the development of pragmatic competence in L2 English. Journal of Pragmatics, 79, 60-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.001
[13]Kim, Y. (2021). Developing pragmatic competence in English as a foreign language context: A longitudinal investigation of Korean learners’ production and perception of compliments. Language Teaching Research, 25(1), 24-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820952342
[14]Lang, J. (2019). What impacts L2 Chinese pragmatic competence in the study abroad context? Current Research and Future Directions. Chinese as a Second Language, 3, 191-220. https:// doi.org/10.1163/2405478X-00302002
[15]Li, C., Li, W. D., & Ren, W. (2020). Tracking the trajectories of international students’ pragmatic choices in studying abroad in China: A social network perspective. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34, 398-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1831951
[16]Liu, M., & Jackson, J. (2021). The role of input, interaction, and feedback in developing pragmatic competence: Evidence from L2 Chinese learners’ requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 177, 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.008
[17]Mitchell, R. (2023). Documenting L2 input and interaction during study abroad: Approaches, instruments and challenges. Second Language Research, 39(1), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583211030626
[18]Ran, Y. (2006). Pragmatics: Phenomena and Analysis (Chinese). Peking University Press.
[19]Ren, W. (2019). Pragmatic development of Chinese during study abroad: A cross-sectional study of learner requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 146, 137-149.
[20]Ren, W., Li, S., & Lü, X. (2022). A Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Second Language Pragmatics Instruction. Applied Linguistics, 44(6), 1010–1029. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac055
[21]Roever, C. (2012). What learners get for free (and when): Learning of routine formulae in ESL and EFL environments. ELT Journal, 66(2), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr045
[22]Roever, C., & Gass, S. M. (2013). Emotion and pragmatic competence. Language Learning, 63(4), 740–765. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12023
[23]Searle, J. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In: Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (editors). Syntax and Semantics (Volume 8): Speech Acts. Academic Press.
[24]Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
[25]Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In: Kasper, G. & Blum-Kulka, S. (editors). Interlanguage Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
[26]Schieffelin, B., & Ochs, E. (1986). Language socialization. Annual Review of Anthropology, 15(1), 163–191. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.15.100186.001115
[27]Taguchi, N., Xiao, F., & Li, S. (2013). Production of formulaic expressions in L2 Chinese: A developmental investigation in a study abroad context. Chinese as a Second Language Research Journal, 2(1), 23-58.
[28]Taguchi, N., Xiao, F., & Li, S. (2016). Effect of Intercultural Competence and Social Contact on Speech Act Production in a Chinese Study Abroad Context. The Modern Language Journal, 2016(4): 775-796. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12360
[29]Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
[30]Taguchi, N. (2018). Description and explanation of pragmatic development: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research. System, 75, 23-32.
[31]Taguchi, N., & Li, S. (2019). Replication research in contextual and individual influences in pragmatic competence. Language Teaching, 52, 128-140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000329
[32]Taguchi, N., Li, S., & Kim, Y. (2020). The role of study abroad experience and language use in L2 pragmatics development. Applied Linguistics, 41(5), 641-666. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz050
[33]Troudi, S., & Ali, A. B. (2019). Positive Transfer of Pragmatic Competence in English Request Forms among EFL Arab Learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(4), 396-406. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0904
[34]Wu, Y. C., & Chang, C. Y. (2021). The impact of input and output on EFL learners’ pragmatic development. System, 98, 102472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102472
[35]Watanabe, Y., & LoCastro, V. (2022). Longitudinal development of pragmatic competence among EFL learners: The role of input and explicit instruction. Language Teaching Research, 26(1), 34-54.
[36]Yang, J. (2016). CFL learners’ recognition and production of pragmatic routine formulae. Chinese as a Second Language, 51, 29-61.
[37]Yuan, F., & Gu, Y. (2018). Proficiency and pragmatic competence: An exploratory study of Chinese EFL learners. System, 74, 19-30.
[38]Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
[39]Zou, L., & Li, S. (2019). Longitudinal development of L2 learners’ pragmatic competence in a study abroad context: A sociocultural perspective. Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 647-671.
Copyright (c) 2024 Xi Yang, Nooreiny Maarof
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author(s) warrant that permission to publish the article has not been previously assigned elsewhere.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher right for the first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under:
OA - Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows for the copying, distribution and transmission of the work, provided the correct attribution of the original creator is stated. Adaptation and remixing are also permitted.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access to, as well as the unrestricted reuse of, original works of all types.
_%E5%89%AF%E6%9C%AC1.png){kind=logo}
