Online non-intrusive grid impedance estimation method for energy storage converters
Abstract
Grid impedance has an important influence on the synchronization stability of grid-connected energy storage converters and their adaptability to weak grids. Conventional intrusive estimation methods require additional perturbations to be injected, which reduces power quality and complicates practical applications. This paper proposes a non-intrusive online grid impedance estimation method. The excitation source is the power regulation dynamics of the energy storage converter itself. The sliding-window discrete Fourier transform is used to extract the fundamental components of the point of common coupling (PCC) voltage and the converter output current from two adjacent single-cycle windows. By combining the voltage equations of the two windows, the unknown equivalent grid voltage components are eliminated, and the grid resistance and reactance can be calculated without injecting additional perturbations or using external phasor measurement equipment. Under constant-current conditions, a simulation with a sudden change in grid impedance is used to verify the effectiveness of the method. Experiments are carried out on a three-phase three-wire energy storage converter under current-step and impedance-switching conditions. The results show that the estimated grid resistance and reactance have small differences from the preset values. The estimation errors of the resistance and reactance on the α-axis are 5.78% and 5.27%, respectively, while those on the β-axis are 0.27% and 1.60%, respectively. This shows that the proposed method can achieve accurate online grid impedance estimation without interfering with the normal operation of the converter, and can improve the stability and adaptive control capability of the energy storage converter.
Copyright (c) 2026 Yunkun Xiang, Kai Liu, Cheng Wan, Hao Zhou, Zipeng Hu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Wang G, Konstantinou G, Townsend CD, et al. A review of power electronics for grid connection of utility-scale battery energy storage systems. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. 2016; 7(4): 1778–1790. doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2016.2586941
[2]Wen B, Dong D, Boroyevich D, et al. Impedance-based analysis of grid-synchronization stability for three-phase paralleled converters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 2016; 31(1): 26–38. doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2015.2419712
[3]Cespedes M, Sun J. Adaptive control of grid-connected inverters based on online grid impedance measurements. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. 2014; 5(2): 516–523. doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2013.2295201
[4]Chang F, Li Y, Peng Y, et al. A dual-layer cooperative control strategy of battery energy storage units for smoothing wind power fluctuations. Journal of Energy Storage. 2023; 70: 107789. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.107789
[5]Rahman MM, Mohamed YARI. Dynamic interactions and stabilization of weak grid-tied parallel VSCs and parallel CSCs systems considering PVG dynamic resistance. IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics. 2024; 5: 21–36. doi: 10.1109/OJPEL.2023.3340268
[6]Kim KH, Cui S, Jung JJ. Current-oriented phase-locked loop method for robust control of grid-connected converter in extremely weak grid. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 2024; 39(10): 11963–11968. doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2024.3419445
[7]Liu J, Sun X, Chen Z, et al. A hybrid multiresonances suppression method for nonsynchronous LCL-type grid-connected inverter clusters under weak grid. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 2024; 39(5): 5386–5399. doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2024.3366191
[8]Zhang GR, Gao K, Xie RS, et al. Modeling and analysis of grid-connected inverter considering AC/DC harmonic coupling. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation. 2024; 61(6): 72–79. (in Chinese)
[9]Belkhayat M. Stability Criteria for AC Power Systems with Regulated Loads [PhD Thesis]. Purdue University; 1997.
[10]Huang L, Xin H, Li Z, et al. Grid-synchronization stability analysis and loop shaping for PLL-based power converters with different reactive power control. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. 2020; 11(1): 501–516. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2019.2924295
[11]Abdoli O, Gholipour M, Hooshmand RA. Improving synchronization stability of grid connected converters by virtual impedance. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution. 2021; 15(7): 1136–1143. doi: 10.1049/gtd2.12091
[12]Rygg A, Molinas M, Zhang C, et al. A modified sequence-domain impedance definition and its equivalence to the dq-domain impedance definition for the stability analysis of AC power electronic systems. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics. 2016; 4(4): 1383–1396. doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2016.2588733
[13]Wang X, Blaabjerg F. Harmonic stability in power electronic based power systems: concept, modeling, and analysis. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. 2019; 10(3): 2858–2870. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2018.2812712
[14]Kervyn de Meerendre M, Prieto-Araujo E, Ahmed KH, et al. Review of local network impedance estimation techniques. IEEE Access. 2020; 8: 213647–213661. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3040099
[15]Su HY, Liu TY. Robust Thevenin equivalent parameter estimation for voltage stability assessment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2018; 33(4): 4637–4639. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2821926
[16]Abdelkader SM, Eladl AA, Saeed MA, et al. Online Thévenin equivalent determination using graphical phasor manipulation. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2018; 97: 233–239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.11.013
[17]Xie SW, Hu ZJ, Wu FJ, et al. Static equivalent parameter identification method of multi-port external network based on recursive least squares algorithm. Power System Protection and Control. 2018; 46(3): 26–34. (in Chinese)
[18]Vu K, Begovic MM, Novosel D, et al. Use of local measurements to estimate voltage-stability margin. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 1999; 14(3): 1029–1035. doi: 10.1109/59.780916
[19]Ohtsuka K, Yokokawa S, Tanaka H, et al. An equivalent of multi-machine power systems and its identification for on-line application to decentralized stabilizers. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 1989; 4(2): 687–693. doi: 10.1109/59.193844
[20]Li CY, Li SL, Wang WS, et al. Impact analysis of wind power grid and source fluctuations on equivalent impedance estimation and grid impedance online identification. Power System Technology. 2024; 48(6): 2376–2384. (in Chinese)
[21]Abdi P, Hamedani-Golshan ME, Alhelou HH, et al. A PMU-based method for on-line Thévenin equivalent estimation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2022; 37(4): 2796–2807. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3125007
[22]Xie DX, Xiao SW. Short-circuit calculation equivalent of external power grid including inverter interfaced distributed generator and analysis of influencing factors. Power System Technology. 2024; 48(7): 2967–2976. (in Chinese)
[23]Pandurangan R, Kaliannan P, Shanmugam P. Dynamic online grid impedance estimation and its effects on DC capacitor lifetime in variable frequency drive. IEEE Access. 2022; 10: 85243–85254. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3197894
[24]Kim WH, Kim YC, Song SH. Estimation and application for line impedance between IBR and POM. Energies. 2025; 18(12): 3135. doi: 10.3390/en18123135
[25]Mohammed N, Zhou W, Ramasubramanian D, et al. Data-driven estimation of impedance of inverter-based resources for efficient stability evaluation. Electric Power Systems Research. 2025; 244: 111559. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2025.111559
[26]Hou ZX, Li Y, Wang J, et al. Equivalent modeling method for grid-forming devices for strength assessment of grid-following/grid-forming hybrid systems. Automation of Electric Power Systems. 2025; 49(22): 90–100. (in Chinese)
[27]Hoffmann N, Fuchs FW. Minimal invasive equivalent grid impedance estimation in inductive-resistive power networks using extended Kalman filter. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 2014; 29(2): 631–641. doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2259507
[28]Yu JR, Liu WJ, Sun JW, et al. An improved grid impedance estimator for grid-forming converters in consideration of controller dynamics. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2023; 154: 109424. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109424




