From linear w-γ correlation to redshift-dependent dynamics: A complete phenomenological framework and testing roadmap for dark energy

  • Tongfeng Zhao orcid

    Independent Researcher, Guangzhou 510000, China

Article ID: 4007
Keywords: dark energy; phenomenological model; structure growth index; Hubble tension; hierarchical Bayesian model comparison; effective gravitational constant; redshift; interacting dark sectors

Abstract

Based on an adaptive universe model, this perspective article presents a phenomenological framework that correlates the dark energy equation of state w with the cosmic growth index γ via the linear relation w(a) = −1 + η(γ(a) − 0.55). Recognizing that the coupling between dark energy and structure formation may evolve with cosmic time, the framework is extended to a redshift-dependent formulation: w(z) = −1 + η(z)[γ(z) − 0.55] + Δwbg(z), where η(z) captures the structure-dependent coupling and Δwbg(z) accounts for intrinsic background evolution. Several physically motivated parameterizations of η(z) are proposed, including continuous forms (smooth transition and oscillatory) and a phenomenological piecewise model aligned with distinct phases of structure formation history. Built upon an interacting dark sector model that strictly conserves energy and momentum, the framework maintains the spacetime geometry of General Relativity while naturally addressing both the Hubble tension (via enhanced late-time expansion) and the S8 tension (via suppressed structure growth). A hierarchical Bayesian testing roadmap with Fisher forecasts demonstrates that upcoming surveys (DESI, Euclid, Roman) can decisively detect couplings of magnitude |η| ≳ 0.05 at high significance. The framework yields distinctive, testable predictions—including correlated w(z) and 8(z) evolution, a gravitational slip parameter ηslip = 1 that distinguishes it from modified gravity theories, and scale-dependent signatures in the nonlinear regime—providing a comprehensive path to either validate or falsify the hypothesized dark energy–structure growth connection.

Published
2026-04-16
How to Cite
Zhao, T. (2026). From linear w-γ correlation to redshift-dependent dynamics: A complete phenomenological framework and testing roadmap for dark energy . Advances in Differential Equations and Control Processes, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.59400/adecp4007
Section
Perspective

References

[1]Cai Y, Ren X, Qiu T, et al. The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2. National Science Review. arXiv preprint. 2026. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwag115

[2]Gu G, Wang X, Wang Y, et al. Dynamical dark energy in light of the DESI DR2 baryonic acoustic oscillations measurements. Nature Astronomy. 2025; 9(12): 1879–1889. doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02669-6

[3]Anbajagane D, Chang C, Drlica-Wagner A, et al. The Dark Energy Camera All Data Everywhere cosmic shear project V: Constraints on cosmology and astrophysics from 270 million galaxies across 13,000 deg2 of the sky. arXiv preprint. 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.03582

[4]Abdul-Karim M, Aguilar J, Ahlen, S, et al. DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints. Physical Review D. 2025; 112(8): 083515. doi: 10.1103/tr6y-kpc6

[5]Aghanim N, Akrami Y, Ashdown, M, et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2020; 641: A6. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

[6]Riess AG, Yuan W, Macri LM, et al. A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 2022; 934(1): L7. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b

[7]Heymans C, Tröster T, Asgari M, et al. KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2021; 646: A140. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039063

[8]Abbott TMC, Aguena M, Alarcon A, et al. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing. Physical Review D. 2022; 105(2): 023520. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.023520

[9]Zhao T. An Adaptive Universe Framework Perspective: Towards Testing the Intrinsic Link Between Dark Energy and Structure Growth. arXiv preprint. 2026. doi: 10.20944/preprints202601.0614.v1

[10]Zhao T. The Cosmic Operating System: Decoding the Unified Logic of Everything’s Operation. arXiv preprint. 2026. doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.18158486

[11]Linder EV. Cosmic Growth History and Expansion History. Physical Review D. 2005; 72(4): 043529. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.043529

[12]Aghamousa A, Aguilar J, Ahlen S, et al. The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design. arXiv preprint. 2016. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1611.00036

[13]Scolnic D, Brout D, Carr A, et al. The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release. The Astrophysical Journal. 2022; 938(2): 113. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a

[14]Blanchard A, Camera S, Carbone C, et al. Euclid preparation: VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological probes. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2020; 642: A191. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038071

[15]Abazajian K, Addison G, Adshead P, et al. CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan. arXiv preprint. 2019. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1907.04473

[16]Handley WJ, Hobson MP, Lasenby AN. PolyChord: Nested sampling for cosmology. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters. 2015; 450(1): L61–L65. doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slv047

[17]Buchner J. UltraNest—A robust, general purpose Bayesian inference engine. arXiv preprint. 2021. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2101.09604

[18]Abbott TMC, Aguena M, Alarcon A, et al. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster Abundances, Weak Lensing, and Galaxy Clustering. arXiv preprint. 2025; doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.13632

[19]Kass RE, Raftery AE. Bayes Factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1995; 90(430): 773–795. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572

[20]Poulin V, Smith TL, Karwal T, et al. Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension. Physical Review Letters. 2019; 122(22): 221301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.221301

[21]Ferreira PG. Cosmological Tests of Gravity. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 2019; 57(1): 335–374. doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104423

[22]Fiorini B. Testing Gravity on Cosmological Scales: Theoretical Predictions with the COLA Method. arXiv preprint. 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.07121

[23]Gómez-Valent A, Pettorino V, Amendola L. Update on Coupled Dark Energy and the H_0 tension. Physical Review D. 2020; 101(12): 123513. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.123513

[24]Creminelli P, Tambalo G, Vernizzi F, et al. Resonant Decay of Gravitational Waves into Dark Energy. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2019; 2019(10): 072–072. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/10/072

[25]Abbott TMC, Adamow M, Aguena M, et al. Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing. arXiv preprint. 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.14559