Quantum purity exchange dynamics in a qubit–resonator system subject to squeezed-vacuum driving

  • Leila Abdelgader

    Advanced Department of Computer Sciences, Taif University–Khurma University College, Al-Khurma 2935, Saudi Arabia

  • Chafaa Hamrouni orcid

    Advanced Department of Computer Sciences, Taif University–Khurma University College, Al-Khurma 2935, Saudi Arabia

Article ID: 3929
Keywords: clarified technical descriptions; corrected phrasing; ensured parallel structure; improved sentence flow; polished punctuation and word choice

Abstract

This work presents a theoretical framework to study the non-Markovian dynamics of a two-level quantum emitter interacting with a broadband squeezed electromagnetic reservoir, and both one- and two-photon interaction processes are incorporated. Mathematical modeling uses a time-convolution less projection operator technique. This yields a time-local master equation. The coefficients of this equation are derived from integrals over the reservoir's squeezed correlation functions:  and . The model is validated through rigorous numerical simulation of the resulting dynamical equations. Testing involves computing key physical observables: the transient emission spectrum  and the field linear entropy . These predictions are systematically analyzed against variations in squeezing parameters , coupling strengths , and detector bandwidth . The results confirm that the model successfully captures phase-dependent decoherence, spectral modulation, and purity oscillations. Notably, two-photon processes suppress decoherence under strong squeezing. The consistency between analytical derivations and numerical outcomes validates the framework. It is established as a predictive tool for quantum optics in engineered nonclassical environments. This study directly connects engineered reservoir properties specifically its nonclassical photon statistics to observable, time-dependent quantum phenomena. The findings offer fundamental insights and a predictive tool for quantum control, sensing, and information processing in tailored electromagnetic environments.

Published
2026-04-01
How to Cite
Abdelgader, L., & Hamrouni, C. (2026). Quantum purity exchange dynamics in a qubit–resonator system subject to squeezed-vacuum driving. Advances in Differential Equations and Control Processes, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.59400/adecp3929

References

[1]Yang ZB, Yang RC, Liu S. Transmitting squeezed states in a cascaded cavity-magnonic system. Optics Express. 2025; 33(3): 4725. doi: 10.1364/OE.551766

[2]Schoelkopf RJ, Girvin SM. Wiring up quantum systems. Nature. 2008; 451(7179): 664–669. doi: 10.1038/451664a

[3]Bentley J, Nurdin H, Chen Y, et al. Designing Optimal Linear Detectors: A Bottom-Up Approach. Physical Review Applied. 2023; 19(3): 034009. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.034009

[4]Khalifa M, Feldmann P, Salfi J. Kinetic inductance parametric converter. Physical Review Applied. 2024; 22(2): 024025. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.024025

[5]Jacobs K, Krastanov S, Heuck M, et al. Quantum theory of single-photon nonlinearities generated by ensembles of emitters. arXiv preprint. 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2307.01375

[6]Wu Z, Yi Z, Gu W, et al. Enhancement of Optomechanical Squeezing of Light Using the Optical Coherent Feedback. Entropy. 2022; 24(12): 1741. doi: 10.3390/e24121741

[7]Yanagimoto R, Ng E, Jankowski M, et al. Mesoscopic ultrafast nonlinear optics—The emergence of multimode quantum non-Gaussian physics. Optica. 2024; 11(7): 896. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.514075

[8]Liu ZX, Zuo XJ, Peng JX, et al. Quantum sensing with cavity optomechanics. Applied Physics Reviews. 2026; 13(1): 011307. doi: 10.1063/5.0237048

[9]Molinares H, Eremeev V. Drive-Loss Engineering and Quantum Discord Probing of Synchronized Optomechanical Squeezing. Mathematics. 2025; 13(13): 2171. doi: 10.3390/math13132171

[10]Lemieux S, Jalil SA, Purschke DN, et al. Photon bunching in high-harmonic emission controlled by quantum light. Nature Photonics. 2025; 19(7): 767–771. doi: 10.1038/s41566-025-01673-6

[11]Yuan M, Seif A, Lingenfelter A, et al. Universal control in bosonic systems with weak Kerr nonlinearities. Physical Review A. 2025; 111(3): 032606. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.111.032606

[12]González-Madrid JC, Marín LG, Chamorro-Cáceres K, et al. Energy Management System for microgrid operation with green hydrogen storage in the Colombian electricity sector. Journal of Energy Storage. 2026; 152: 120224. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2025.120224

[13]Ding Y, Chen X, Magdalena-Benedito R, et al. Closed-loop control of a noisy qubit with reinforcement learning. Machine Learning: Science and Technology. 2023; 4(2): 025020. doi: 10.1088/2632-2153/acd048

[14]Barzanjeh S, Xuereb A, Gröblacher S, et al. Optomechanics for quantum technologies. Nature Physics. 2022; 18(1): 15–24. doi: 10.1038/s41567-021-01402-0

[15]Al-Sawai WM. Quantum dynamics of a cantilever under combined additive and parametric noise: Implications for squeezing and sensitivity control. Journal of Applied Physics. 2025; 138(16): 164401. doi: 10.1063/5.0291465

[16]Wu Y, Xu M, Tang HX. Junction-free microwave two-mode radiation from a kinetic inductance nanowire. Physical Review Applied. 2024; 21(1): 014029. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.014029

[17]Wang L, Sun P, Kong LJ, et al. Quantum next-generation reservoir computing and its quantum optical implementation. Physical Review A. 2025; 111(2): 022609. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.111.022609

[18]Drammeh M, Samikannu R, Yahya A, et al. Optimal energy management system for a community microgrid: A case study from the Gambia. Utilities Policy. 2026; 99: 102132. doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2025.102132

[19]Houtepen AJ, Sargent EH, Infante I, et al. Colloidal quantum dots for optoelectronics. Nature Reviews Methods Primers. 2025; 5(1): 42. doi: 10.1038/s43586-025-00413-y

[20]Delfanazari K. Chip-scale electrically driven superconducting coherent photon sources for quantum information processing. Nature Photonics. 2025; 19(11): 1163–1177. doi: 10.1038/s41566-025-01735-9

[21]Sakurai A, Hayashi A, Munro WJ, et al. Quantum optical reservoir computing powered by boson sampling. Optica Quantum. 2025; 3(3): 238. doi: 10.1364/OPTICAQ.541432

[22]Ma J, Yang J, Liu S, et al. Nanophotonic quantum skyrmions enabled by semiconductor cavity quantum electrodynamics. Nature Physics. 2025; 21(9): 1462–1468. doi: 10.1038/s41567-025-02973-y

[23]Blais A, Huang RS, Wallraff A, et al. Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation. Physical Review A. 2004; 69(6): 062320. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.062320

[24]Yu W, Wang W. Enhancing resilience and cost efficiency in multi-microgrids through peer-to-peer energy trading and decentralized energy management systems. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks. 2026; 45: 102116. doi: 10.1016/j.segan.2025.102116

[25]Atef M, Alahakoon S, Mumtahina U, et al. A review of microgrid energy management systems: Methods, challenges, and future directions. International Journal of Ambient Energy. 2026; 47(1): 2595117. doi: 10.1080/01430750.2025.2595117