Reinforcement learning from demonstration for robust control of superconducting qubits: Decoherence suppression via environmental engineering

  • Chafaa Hamrouni orcid

    Advanced Department of Computer Sciences, Taif University–Khurma University College, Al-Khurma 2935, Saudi Arabia

  • Leila Abdelgader

    Advanced Department of Computer Sciences, Taif University–Khurma University College, Al-Khurma 2935, Saudi Arabia

Article ID: 3910
Keywords: quantum control; transient emission spectra; squeezed reservoirs; feedback control; field purity engineering; open quantum systems; pulse shaping; qubit dynamics

Abstract

This work develops a control-oriented theoretical framework for the manipulation of transient emission spectra and field-state purity in a qubit interacting with a broadband squeezed reservoir. We model the joint qubit-field dynamics using a time-resolved open quantum system formalism. This establishes a direct, quantitative connection between transient spectral characteristics, quantum purity evolution, and controllable system parameters. The analysis reveals that nonclassical reservoir properties, particularly squeezing-induced correlations, strongly influence both spectral deformation and coherence redistribution during the early-time dynamics. Building on this foundation, the work explores practical control strategies aimed at engineering the system’s dynamical response. Pulse shaping and time-dependent modulation of qubit-reservoir coupling offer effective control tools. These regulate spectral broadening, suppress unwanted decoherence, and accelerate convergence toward stabilized operating regimes. In addition, feedback-assisted qubit probing protocols are investigated as a means of monitoring and controlling field purity while minimizing measurement back-action on the squeezed mode. Our results show that well-designed control loops can balance information extraction and disturbance. This enables efficient regulation of nonclassical field properties. The proposed approach highlights transient spectral measurements as a powerful diagnostic and control resource, linking observable emission features to underlying quantum correlations and purity dynamics. From an engineering perspective, the framework offers practical guidelines. These guide the design of feedback-stabilized quantum emitters and reservoir-engineered coherence control. These findings are directly relevant to emerging quantum technologies, including cavity and circuit quantum electrodynamics, quantum sensing, and quantum communication systems operating in nonclassical environments.

Published
2026-03-17
How to Cite
Hamrouni, C., & Abdelgader, L. (2026). Reinforcement learning from demonstration for robust control of superconducting qubits: Decoherence suppression via environmental engineering. Advances in Differential Equations and Control Processes, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.59400/adecp3910
Section
Article

References

[1]Levenson-Falk EM, Shanto SA. A review of design concerns in superconducting quantum circuits. Materials for Quantum Technology. 2025; 5(2): 022003. doi: 10.1088/2633-4356/ade10d

[2]Rubin AH, Marinelli B, Norman VA, et al. Digital quantum simulation of cavity quantum electrodynamics: insights from superconducting and trapped ion quantum testbeds. Quantum Science and Technology. 2025; 10(4): 045057. doi: 10.1088/2058-9565/ae0af0

[3]Al-Sawai WM. Quantum dynamics of a cantilever under combined additive and parametric noise: Implications for squeezing and sensitivity control. Journal of Applied Physics. 2025; 138(16): 164401. doi: 10.1063/5.0291465

[4]Delfanazari K. Chip-scale electrically driven superconducting coherent photon sources for quantum information processing. Nature Photonics. 2025; 19(11): 1163–1177. doi: 10.1038/s41566-025-01735-9

[5]Wu Y, Xu M, Tang HX. Junction-free microwave two-mode radiation from a kinetic inductance nanowire. Physical Review Applied. 2024; 21(1): 014029. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.014029

[6]Khalifa M, Feldmann P, Salfi J. Kinetic inductance parametric converter. Physical Review Applied. 2024; 22(2): 024025. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.024025

[7]Jacobs K, Krastanov S, Heuck M, et al. Quantum theory of single-photon nonlinearities generated by ensembles of emitters. arXiv preprint. 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2307.01375

[8]Harraf H, Amazioug M, Laamara RA. Coherent feedback-enhanced asymmetry of thermal process in open quantum systems: Cavity optomechanics. arXiv preprint. 2025. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2512.13288

[9]Dagnaw Mekonnen H, Yeshiwas Y. Enhanced entanglement and synchronization in a coupled optomechanical system using a coherent feedback loop. Optics Continuum. 2026; 5(1): 196. doi: 10.1364/OPTCON.574353

[10]Mekonnen HD, Tesfahannes TG, Darge TY, et al. Boosting macroscopic entanglement in charged cavity optomechanical system through coherent feedback loop. Journal of Optics. 2025; 54(4): 2096–2104. doi: 10.1007/s12596-024-01926-7

[11]Yuan M, Seif A, Lingenfelter A, et al. Universal control in bosonic systems with weak Kerr nonlinearities. Physical Review A. 2025; 111(3): 032606. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.111.032606

[12]Liu ZX, Zuo XJ, Peng JX, et al. Quantum sensing with cavity optomechanics. Applied Physics Reviews. 2026; 13(1): 011307. doi: 10.1063/5.0237048

[13]Liu R, An JH. Quantum squeezed-reservoir engineering in Laguerre-Gaussian cavity optomechanics. Physical Review A. 2025; 111(4): 043718. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.111.043718

[14]Molinares H, Eremeev V. Drive-Loss Engineering and Quantum Discord Probing of Synchronized Optomechanical Squeezing. Mathematics. 2025; 13(13): 2171. doi: 10.3390/math13132171

[15]Tang Z, Li W, Sun H, et al. Cavity-optomechanical probe of gravity between massive mechanical oscillators. Physical Review A. 2025; 112(5): 053520. doi: 10.1103/m2zy-3ywx

[16]Luo Y, Diamandi HH, Li H, et al. Lifetime-limited Gigahertz-frequency Mechanical Oscillators with Millisecond Coherence Times. arXiv preprint. 2025. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2504.07523

[17]Ding Y, Chen X, Magdalena-Benedito R, et al. Closed-loop control of a noisy qubit with reinforcement learning. Machine Learning: Science and Technology. 2023; 4(2): 025020. doi: 10.1088/2632-2153/acd048

[18]Qiu W, Chen P, Liu S, et al. Interfacial phonon engineering in 2D heterostructures for cavity-less optomechanical systems. Journal of Applied Physics. 2025; 138(7): 073106. doi: 10.1063/5.0285259

[19]Satish MSS, Raj A, Dharmadhikari AK, et al. Thermally-tailored optical fiber lens: fundamentals, fabrication and advances. Journal of Optics. 2026; 28(1): 013001. doi: 10.1088/2040-8986/ae30f0

[20]Li S, Fan Y, Li X, et al. Robust quantum control using reinforcement learning from demonstration. npj Quantum Information. 2025; 11(1): 124. doi: 10.1038/s41534-025-01065-2

[21]Chatterjee A, Schwinger J, Gao YY. Enhanced Qubit Readout via Reinforcement Learning. Physical Review Applied. 2025; 23(5): 054057. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.054057

[22]Reuer K, Landgraf J, Fösel T, et al. Realizing a deep reinforcement learning agent for real-time quantum feedback. Nature Communications. 2023; 14(1): 7138. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42901-3

[23]Niu MY, Boixo S, Smelyanskiy VN, et al. Universal quantum control through deep reinforcement learning. npj Quantum Information. 2019; 5(1): 33. doi: 10.1038/s41534-019-0141-3

[24]Khalid I, Weidner CA, Jonckheere EA, et al. Sample-efficient model-based reinforcement learning for quantum control. Physical Review Research. 2023; 5(4): 043002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.043002

[25]Fösel T, Tighineanu P, Weiss T, et al. Reinforcement Learning with Neural Networks for Quantum Feedback. Physical Review X. 2018; 8(3): 031084. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031084