Adaptive Enriched Rational Spectral Methods with sinh transformations and asymptotic correctors for variable-coefficient singular perturbation problems

  • Lufeng Yang orcid

    School of Mathematics and Information Science, North Minzu University, Yinchuan 750021, China; The Collaborative Innovation Center of Scientific Computing and Intelligent Information Processing of Ningxia Province, Yinchuan 750021, China

Article ID: 3821
Keywords: Rational spectral method; Boundary layer; Convection–diffusion equations; Reaction–diffusion equations; Sinh transformation

Abstract

This paper introduces and analyzes novel Enriched Rational Spectral Methods for efficiently solving singular perturbation problems exhibiting sharp boundary layers. While spectral methods are known for their ‘spectral accuracy’ in solving smooth problems, their performance deteriorates for stiff differential equations because they fail to resolve rapid transitions in the solution. To overcome this limitation, we propose a rational spectral collocation framework enriched with asymptotic corrector functions. These correctors are derived directly from a boundary layer analysis of the variable-coefficient operator itself, enabling them to accurately capture the solution's singular behavior. Two specific schemes are proposed: the Enriched Spectral Method (ESM) and the Enriched Rational Spectral Method combined with a sinh transformation (ERSM-sinh). In ERSM-sinh, the corrector functions are integrated with a sinh transformation whose parameters—layer location and width—are determined from asymptotic estimates. The correction parameters are obtained implicitly by solving the discrete algebraic system arising from the original problem. Extensive numerical experiments on convection-diffusion and reaction-diffusion problems with variable coefficients demonstrate the superior performance of our methods. Results show that ERSM-sinh maintains robust spectral accuracy, significantly outperforms existing approaches such as RSC-SSM and RSCAT for variable-coefficient problems, and achieves high precision with minimal computational cost—even for very small perturbation parameters (e.g., ε = 1010). This work provides a high-resolution, efficient, and generalizable framework for singularly perturbed boundary value problems.

Published
2026-02-09
How to Cite
Yang, L. (2026). Adaptive Enriched Rational Spectral Methods with sinh transformations and asymptotic correctors for variable-coefficient singular perturbation problems. Advances in Differential Equations and Control Processes, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.59400/adecp3821
Section
Article

References

[1]Chen Z. Application of singular perturbation in the analysis of laminar premixed flames. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. 2018; 50(6): 1418–1435. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-18-243 (in Chinese)

[2]Zhou LN, Cai TC, Zhao JG, et al. Reinforcement learning-based optimal operational control of complex industrial processes using singular perturbations. Control and Decision. 2025; 40(5): 1581–1589. doi: 10.13195/j.kzyjc.2024.0700 (in Chinese)

[3]He Z, Guo Q. Comparative analysis of multiple deep learning models for forecasting monthly ambient PM2.5 concentrations: A case study in Dezhou City, China. Atmosphere. 2024; 15(12): 1432. doi: 10.3390/atmos15121432

[4]Roos HG. Robust Numerical Methods for Singularly Perturbed Differential Equations: A Survey Covering 2008–2012. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2012; 2012(1): 379547.

[5]Temel Z, Cakir M. A robust numerical method for a singularly perturbed semilinear problem with integral boundary conditions. Contemporary Mathematics. 2024; 5(1): 446–464. doi: 10.37256/cm.5120243020

[6]Nefedov NN. Development of methods of asymptotic analysis of transition layers in reaction–diffusion–advection equations: Theory and applications. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics. 2021; 61: 2068–2087. doi: 10.1134/S0965542521120095

[7]Alam MJ, Prasad HS, Ranjan R. A new exponentially fitted numerical integration scheme for solving singularly perturbed two point boundary value problems. WSEAS Transactions on Mathematics. 2020; 19: 98–107. doi: 10.37394/23206.2020.19.67

[8]Duru H, Demirbaş M. A numerical method for solving singularly perturbed quasilinear boundary value problems on Shishkin mesh. Turkish Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science. 2022; 14(1): 145–154. doi: 10.47000/tjmcs.1010528

[9]Raina A, Natesan S. A weak Galerkin finite element method for fourth-order parabolic singularly perturbed problems on layer adapted Shishkin mesh. Applied Numerical Mathematics. 2025; 207: 520–533. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2024.09.019

[10]Kellogg RB, Xenophontos C. An enriched subspace finite element method for convection-diffusion problems. International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modeling. 2009; 7(3): 425–442.

[11]Han H, Huang Z, Kellogg RB. A tailored finite point method for a singular perturbation problem on an unbounded domain. Journal of Scientific Computing. 2008; 36(2): 243–261. doi: 10.1007/s10915-008-9187-7

[12]Wang Y, Cao J, Fu J. Tailored finite point method for time fractional convection dominated diffusion problems with boundary layers. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences. 2020; 47(13): 11044–11061. doi: 10.1002/mma.6772

[13]Kong W, Huang Z. A new L1-TFPM scheme for the singularly perturbed subdiffusion equations. CSIAM Transactions on Applied Mathematics. 2025; 6(1): 1–30. doi: 10.4208/csiam-am.SO-2023-0024

[14]Jayalakshmi GJ, Tamilselvan A. Second order difference scheme for singularly perturbed boundary turning point problems. Journal of Mathematical Modeling. 2021; 9(2): 201–215.

[15]Kellogg RB, Linss T, Stynes M. A finite difference method on layer-adapted meshes for an elliptic reaction-diffusion system in two dimensions. Mathematics of Computation. 2008; 77(264): 2085–2096. doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-08-02125-X

[16]Kabeto MJ, Duressa GF. Accelerated nonstandard finite difference method for singularly perturbed Burger–Huxley equations. BMC Research Notes. 2021; 14(1): 446. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05858-4

[17]Prince PA, Govindarao L, Elango S. Non-standard finite difference scheme for system of singularly perturbed Fredholm integro-differential equations. Journal of Mathematical Modeling. 2025; 13(4): 501–520.

[18]Zhao Q, Wang R, Wang Z, et al. Barycentric rational collocation method for Burgers' equation. Journal of Mathematics. 2022; 2022(1): 2177998. doi: 10.1155/2022/2177998

[19]Chen S, Wang Y. A rational spectral collocation method for third-order singularly perturbed problems. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 2016; 307: 93–105. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2016.03.009

[20]Li J, Su XN, Qu JZ. Linear barycentric rational collocation method for solving telegraph equation. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences. 2021; 44(14): 11720–11737. doi: 10.1002/mma.7548

[21]Yang L, Wu YJ. Rational spectral collocation combined with singularity separation method for second-order singular perturbation problems. Journal of Mathematical Sciences. 2023; 270(3): 294–306. doi: 10.1007/s10958-023-06347-8

[22]Hwang Y, Jung CY. Enriched spectral method for stiff convection-dominated equations. Journal of Scientific Computing. 2018; 74: 1325–1346. doi: 10.1007/s10915-017-0494-8

[23]Shao W, Zheng S. Sinc collocation method and sinh-transform for solving singular perturbed problems with a transition layer. Journal of Xinyang Normal University Natural Science Edition. 2024; 38(1): 92–100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-583X.2025.01.013 (in Chinese)

[24]Gie GM, Hong Y, Jung CY. Semi-analytic PINN methods for singularly perturbed boundary value problems. Applicable Analysis. 2024; 103(14): 2554–2571. doi: 10.1080/00036811.2024.2302405

[25]Wang L, Zhang L, He GW. Physics-informed neural networks for solving singularly perturbed boundary-layer problems. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics. 2024; 45(9): 1457–1472.

[26]Gol'dberg VN. Stability of a singularly perturbed problem. Differential Equations. 2012; 48(4): 524–537. doi: 10.1134/S0012266112040076

[27]de Jager EM, Furu J. The Theory of Singular Perturbations. Elsevier; 1996.

[28]Bansal K, Sharma KK, Kaushik A, et al. Numerical analysis of singularly perturbed parabolic reaction diffusion differential difference equations. International Journal of Computer Mathematics. 2024; 101(2): 217–235. doi: 10.1080/00207160.2024.2324455

[29]Tee TW, Trefethen LN. A rational spectral collocation method with adaptively transformed Chebyshev grid points. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. 2006; 28(5): 1798–1811. doi: 10.1137/050641296

[30]Weideman JAC, Trefethen LN. The eigenvalues of second-order spectral differentiation matrices. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. 1988; 25(6): 1279–1298. doi: 10.1137/0725072

[31]Armentano MG, Lombardi AL, Penessi C. A finite element analysis in balanced norms for a coupled system of singularly perturbed reaction-diffusion equations. Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics. 2025; 25(2): 235–250. doi: 10.1515/cmam-2023-0219

[32]Prathap T, Rao RN. Uniformly convergent finite difference methods for singularly perturbed parabolic partial differential equations with mixed shifts. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 2023; 69: 1679–1704. doi: 10.1007/s12190-022-01802-2