Physics-informed neural networks for solving steady-state heat conduction inverse problems

  • Tangwei Liu orcid

    School of Science, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China

  • Qiong Zou orcid

    School of Science, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China

  • Xiaoqing Ruan orcid

    School of Science, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China; Mathematics Teaching and Research Group, Sheshan School, Shanghai 201602, China

  • Dingding Yan orcid

    School of Science, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China

  • Jeevan Kafle orcid

    Central Department of Mathematics, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal

  • Zhongzhou Lan orcid

    School of Computer Information Management, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, Hohhot 010070, China

Article ID: 3584
Keywords: physics-informed neural networks; three-dimensional heat conduction; inverse problem; loss function; numerical simulation

Abstract

This paper investigates numerical methods for a class of three-dimensional steady-state heat conduction inverse problems. By employing Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), the three-dimensional heat conduction inverse problems are reformulated as optimization problems with respect to a properly defined loss function. Two cases with different additional conditions are considered: one incorporates an additional boundary temperature gradient condition, while the other involves an additional partial internal temperature measurement. Corresponding efficient algorithms are developed to solve the resulting optimization problems. To optimize the performance of the proposed numerical framework, systematic sensitivity analyses are performed to rigorously justify the selection of key hyperparameters (e.g., activation functions and network architecture). Additionally, to validate the mathematical effectiveness and noise robustness of the algorithm, this study primarily employs synthetic data with controlled noise levels for quantitative evaluation. Numerical results demonstrate that the proposed method can efficiently and accurately approximate the solutions to the three-dimensional (3D) heat conduction inverse problems for both polynomial and non-polynomial cases. In addition, a theoretical analysis is provided to interpret the method's stability against noise amplification. Future work will focus on applying the proposed framework to real-world field data to further validate its practical engineering value.

Published
2026-03-05
How to Cite
Liu, T., Zou, Q., Ruan, X., Yan, D., Kafle, J., & Lan, Z. (2026). Physics-informed neural networks for solving steady-state heat conduction inverse problems. Advances in Differential Equations and Control Processes, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.59400/adecp3584
Section
Article

References

[1]Yang Z, Wu X, He X, et al. A multiscale analysis-assisted two-stage reduced-order deep learning approach for effective thermal conductivity of arbitrary contrast heterogeneous materials. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2024; 136(Part A): 108916.

[2]Ye CQ, Chung ET. Constraint energy minimizing generalized multiscale finite element method for inhomogeneous boundary value problems with high contrast coefficients. arXiv preprint. 2023; arXiv:2201.04834.

[3]Yang Z, Xie J. Hölder regularity of solutions for certain degenerate parabolic integro-differential equation. Advances in Differential Equations and Control Processes. 2024; 31(3): 379–395.

[4]Alsulami AS, Al-Mazmumy M, Alyami MA, et al. Application of Adomian decomposition method to a generalized fractional Riccati differential equation (Ψ-FRDE). Advances in Differential Equations and Control Processes. 2024; 31(4): 531–561.

[5]Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis GE. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics. 2019; 378: 686–707.

[6]Kabanikhin SI. Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems: Theory and Applications. De Gruyter; 2011.

[7]Omurov TD, Dzhumagulov KR. Regularization of the inverse problem with the d'Alembert operator in an unbounded domain degenerating into a system of integral equations of Volterra type. Advances in Differential Equations and Control Processes. 2024; 31(4): 473–486.

[8]Luo J, Yang QQ, Lu S, et al. A novel formulation and sequential solution strategy with time-space adaptive mesh refinement for efficient reconstruction of local boundary heat flux. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2019; 141: 1288–1300.

[9]Wang C, Heng Y, Luo J, et al. A fast Bayesian parallel solution framework for large-scale parameter estimation of 3D inverse heat transfer problems. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2024; 155: 107409.

[10]Higuera M, Perales JM, Rapún ML, et al. Solving inverse geometry heat conduction problems by postprocessing steady thermograms. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2019; 143: 118490.

[11]Grossmann TG, Komorowska UJ, Latz J, et al. Can physics-informed neural networks beat the finite element method? IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics. 2024; 89(1): 143–174.

[12]Antonion K, Wang X, Raissi M, et al. Machine learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Progress and challenges. Academic Journal of Science and Technology. 2024; 9(1): 46–49.

[13]Feng X, Jiang Y, Qin JX, et al. Unsupervised learning method for the wave equation based on finite difference residual constraints loss. arXiv preprint. 2024; arXiv:2401.12489.

[14]Hu H, Qi L, Chao X. Physics-informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for computational solid mechanics: Numerical frameworks and applications. Thin-Walled Structures. 2024; 205(Part B): 112495.

[15]Lee H, Kang IS. Neural algorithm for solving differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics. 1990; 91(1): 110–131.

[16]Wang L, Mendel JM. Structured trainable networks for matrix algebra. In: Proceedings of the 1990 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks; 17–21 June 1990; San Diego, CA, USA.

[17]Yentis R, Zaghloul ME. VLSI implementation of locally connected neural network for solving partial differential equations. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications. 1996; 43(8): 687–690.

[18]Lagaris IE, Likas A, Fotiadis DI. Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. 1998; 9(5): 987–1000.

[19]Pang G, Lu L, Karniadakis GE. fPINNs: Fractional physics-informed neural networks. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. 2019; 41(4): A2603–A2626.

[20]Jagtap AD, Kharazmi E, Karniadakis GE. Conservative Physics-Informed Neural Networks on discrete domains for conservation laws: Applications to forward and inverse problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2020; 365: 113028.

[21]Yu J, Lu L, Meng X, et al. Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2022; 393: 114823.

[22]Shin Y, Darbon J, Karniadakis GE. On the convergence of physics informed neural networks for linear second-order elliptic and parabolic type PDEs. Communications in Computational Physics. 2020; 28(5): 2042–2074.

[23]Manthena VR, Srinivas VB, Lamba NK, et al. Fractional thermal response in a thermosensitive rectangular plate due to the action of a moving source of heat. Advances in Differential Equations and Control Processes. 2024; 31(3): 397–415.

[24]Zhang B, Wu G, Gu Y, et al. Multi-domain physics-informed neural network for solving forward and inverse problems of steady-state heat conduction in multilayer media. Physics of Fluids. 2022; 34(11): 113601.

[25]Ramazanova AT. Necessary conditions for optimality in one nonsmooth optimal control problem for Goursat-Darboux systems. Advances in Differential Equations and Control Processes. 2024; 31(4): 673–681.

[26]Li Y, Hu X. Artificial neural network approximations of Cauchy inverse problem for linear PDEs. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 2022; 414: 126678.

[27]Bian BX, Zhou HL, Cheng CZ, et al. TSVD regularization method for inverse identification of two-dimensional potential boundary conditions. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Natural Science Edition). 2014; 37(9): 1097–1101.

[28]Mishra S, Molinaro R. Estimates on the generalization error of physics-informed neural networks for approximating a class of inverse problems for PDEs. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis. 2022; 42(2): 981–1022.