Using learning and cognitive models for assessing quality of content hosted into websites

  • Shahida Tasneem Shaik Department of IoT, KLEF Deemed to be University, Vaddeswaram, Guntur District 522302, India
  • Hima Bindu Duddempudi Department of IoT, KLEF Deemed to be University, Vaddeswaram, Guntur District 522302, India
  • Kunal Sana Department of IoT, KLEF Deemed to be University, Vaddeswaram, Guntur District 522302, India
  • Kodanda Rama Sastry Jammalamadaka Department of IoT, KLEF Deemed to be University, Vaddeswaram, Guntur District 522302, India
  • Sasi Bhanu Jammalamadaka Department of Computer Science and Engineering, CMR College of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad 501401, India
  • Balakrishna Kamesh Duvvuri Department of Computer Science and Engineering, MLR Institute of Technology, Hyderabad 500043, India
Article ID: 2343
Keywords: quality; assessment; computational methods; framework; WEB content; WEB sites

Abstract

The quality of a WEB site is based on 42 different factors. Out of those factors, the quality of content is the key factor. Different types of content are hosted on websites, including text, data, text data, images, videos, graphics, and animations. There are also interrelations among the content sources. The element-level connectivity and hierarchical element connectivity of content sources dictate the quality of content hosted on the website. The number of content elements, connectivity among the elements and the number of hierarchies existing on a website are many and, therefore, require a framework using which the quality of content is computed. This paper presents a framework based on an expert and ANN model. Using the framework, the quality of content hosted on a website is computed considering all sub-factors determining the quality of the factor “Content”. Using the framework proposed in this paper, the quality of the content was estimated accurately to 91.80.

Published
2025-04-17
How to Cite
Shaik, S. T., Duddempudi, H. B., Sana, K., Jammalamadaka, K. R. S., Jammalamadaka, S. B., & Duvvuri, B. K. (2025). Using learning and cognitive models for assessing quality of content hosted into websites. Advances in Differential Equations and Control Processes, 32(2), 2343. https://doi.org/10.59400/adecp2343
Section
Article

References

[1]Priya BV, Sastry JKR. Assessment of Website Quality based on Appearance. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research. 2019; 7(10): 360–375. doi: 10.30534/ijeter/2019/017102019

[2]Priya BV, Sastry JKR. Computing Quality of Structure of a Web-Site. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering. 2019; 8(5): 2142–2148. doi: 10.30534/ijatcse/2019/44852019

[3]Priya BV, Sastry JKR. Computing Quality of Navigation Designed into a WEB-Site. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research. 2019; 7(11): 466–472. doi: 10.30534/ijeter/2019/117112019

[4]Sastry JKR, Sreenidhi N, Sasidhar K. Quantifying quality of WEB site based on usability. International Journal of Engineering & Technology. 2018; 7(2.7): 320. doi: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.7.10606

[5]Priya BV, Sastry JKR. Framework for Assessing the Quality of Multimedia objects Hosted on a WEB-Site. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research. 2019; 7(11): 498–505. doi: 10.30534/ijeter/2019/167112019

[6]Priya BV, Sastry JKR. Building an Expert System through Machine Learning for Predicting the Quality of a Website Based on Its Completion. Computers. 2023; 12(9): 181. doi: 10.3390/computers12090181

[7]Ghalut T, Larijani H, Shahrabi A. Content-Based Video Quality Prediction Using Random Neural Networks for Video Streaming over LTE Networks. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; 2015.

[8]Piskozub L. The culture of textual content of a website from the point of view of a specialist editor (Ukrainian). Bulletin of the Book Chamber; 2023.

[9]Abiantoro D, Kusumo DS. Analysis of Web Content Quality Information on the Koseeker Website Using the Web Content Audit Method and ParseHub Tools. In: Proceedings of the 2020 8th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT); 2020.

[10]Ricca F, Tonella P. Analysis and Testing of Web Applications. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering; 2001.

[11]Alwahaishi S, Snášel V. Assessing the LCC Websites Quality. In: Proceedings of the 9th RoEduNet IEEE International Conference; 2010.

[12]Hasan L, Abuelrub E. Assessing the quality of web sites. Applied Computing and Informatics. 2011; 9(1): 11–29. doi: 10.1016/j.aci.2009.03.001

[13]Singh KK, Kumar P, Mathur J. Implementation of a Model for Websites Quality Evaluation - DU Website. International Journal of Innovations & Advancement in Computer Science. 2014; 3(1).

[14]Abduganiev SG. Website Quality Evaluation Methodology Universal Star: 1st point – “Content.” Informatics. 2020; 17(3): 95–112. doi: 10.37661/1816-0301-2020-17-3-95-112

[15]Morales-Vargas A, Pedraza-Jimenez R, Codina L. Website quality evaluation: a model for developing comprehensive assessment instruments based on key quality factors. Journal of Documentation. 2023; 79(7): 95–114. doi: 10.1108/jd-11-2022-0246

[16]Kardanmoghaddam H, Masoumi M. Website quality assessment. A case study of GSM hosting forum. Facta universitatis-series: Electronics and Energetics. 2022; 35(2): 199–216. doi: 10.2298/fuee2202199k

[17]Magalhães LFG, Gonçalves MA, Canuto SD, et al. Quality assessment of collaboratively-created web content with no manual intervention based on soft multi-view generation. Expert Systems with Applications. 2019; 132: 226–238. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.04.053

[18]Raghavarao YV, Sasidhar K, Sastry J, et al. Quantifying quality of WEB sites based on content. International Journal of Engineering & Technology. 2018; 7(2.7): 138. doi: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.7.10280

[19]Muirhead J. Assessing Online Content Quality through User Surveys and Web Analytics. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval; 2019.

[20]Morales-Vargas A, Pedraza-Jiménez R, Codina L. Website quality: An analysis of scientific production. Informational pluralism. 2020; 29(5). doi: 10.3145/epi.2020.sep.08

[21]Rekik R, Kallel I, Casillas J, et al. Assessing web sites quality: A systematic literature review by text and association rules mining. International Journal of Information Management. 2018; 38(1): 201–216. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.06.007

[22]Morales-Vargas, Alejandro; Pedraza-Jiménez, Rafael; Codina, Lluís (2020). “Website quality: An analysis of scientific production”. Professional de la information, v. 29, n. 5, e290508. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.08

[23]Zhang J, Song Z, Li Y. UGC content quality assessment method and device and electronic device. CN201910535860.8, 20 June 2019.

[24]He L, Tang L, Wang N. Quality Assessment Method of Web Documents Based on Random Forest. In: Proceedings of the 2017 5th International Conference on Mechatronics, Materials, Chemistry and Computer Engineering (ICMMCCE 2017); 2017.

[25]Mavetera P, Lubbe S, Meyer J. A student perspective on information quality of websites. The African Journal of Information SystemsThe African Journal of Information Systems. 2017; 9(3).

[26]Dalip DH, Lima H, Gonçalves MA, et al. Quality assessment of collaborative content with minimal information. IEEE; 2014.

[27]Klink J, Bardowski P, Uhl T. Content-Agnostic Web Browsing Quality Assessment. In: Proceedings of the 2018 26th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM); 2018.

[28]Jayanthi B, Krishnakumari P. An intelligent method to assess webpage quality sing extreme learning machine. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security. 2016; 16(9): 81–85.

[29]Huang GB, Ding X, Zhou H. Optimization method based extreme learning machine for classification. Neurocomputing. 2010; 74(1–3): 155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2010.02.019

[30]Huang G, Zhou H, Ding X, et al. Extreme Learning Machine for Regression and Multiclass Classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics). 2012; 42(2): 513–529. doi: 10.1109/tsmcb.2011.2168604