On supersonic projectile and its special versatile cannon-canister system
Abstract
This manuscript presents the design, analysis, and validation roadmap for a compact 20 mm solid-propellant rocket projectile and an associated family of modular launchers optimized for mid-range interception and anti-armor engagement. The system addresses the capability gap between man-portable anti-armor weapons and high-volume point-defense nodes (CIWS). The propulsion architecture utilizes a high-efficiency AP/HTPB (ammonium perchlorate/hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene) composite grain housed in a selectively laser-melted Inconel 718 pressure casing. Thermal protection is achieved via an integrated polyether ether ketone (PEEK) liner and graphite-phenolic nose, enabling sustained structural integrity against convective and radiative heat fluxes during the 2.5 s burn. Analytic internal-ballistic and nozzle isentropic calculations predict an exit velocity of approximately 1400 m/s (Mach 4) and an under-expanded supersonic jet profile. Terminal-effect models indicate rolled homogeneous armour (RHA)-equivalent penetration near 116 mm and approximately 140 mm into representative composite laminates, exceeding legacy autocannon performance. A compact, mechanically-armed setback primer ensures reliable, self-contained ignition within 6 ms of barrel exit. Three launcher classes are described: soldier-portable shoulder tube, building-mounted multi-tube interceptor, and adaptive variable-barrel arrays, enabling flexible engagement against modern threats such as unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarms and light armor. Finally, the manuscript details a staged experimental validation plan and an environmental compatibility analysis to ensure operational feasibility, safety, and compliance with modern defense standards regarding emissions and handling.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jacob Nagler

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Jasper S. Resilience Against Hybrid Threats: Empowered by Emerging Technologies: A Study Based on Russian Invasion of Ukraine. In: Balomenos KP, Fytopoulos A, Pardalos PM (editors). Handbook for Management of Threats, Springer Optimization and Its Applications. Springer International Publishing; 2023. pp. 209–226. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-39542-0_10
[2]Sutton GP, Biblarz O. Rocket propulsion elements, 9th ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
[3]Khalil M, Ahmed MYM. Flight Performance and Dispersion Analysis for a Flexible Tactical Missile. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 2023; 60(4): 1297–1307. doi: 10.2514/1.A35607
[4]Defense Science Board Task Force on Directed Energy Weapons. Available online: https://dsb.cto.mil/wp-content/uploads/reports/2000s/ADA476320.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2025).
[5]Remissa I, Jabri H, Hairch Y, et al. Propulsion Systems, Propellants, Green Propulsion Subsystems and their Applications: A Review. Eurasian Chemico-Technological Journal. 2023; 25(1): 3–19. doi: 10.18321/ectj1491
[6]Thomas DJ. Advanced 3D additive manufacturing techniques for revolutionizing the next-generation rocket engine nozzle fabrication. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2023; 127(7–8): 3747–3760. doi: 10.1007/s00170-023-11669-7
[7]Denny M, McFadzean A. Rocket Science: From Fireworks to the Photon Drive. Springer International Publishing; 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-28080-2
[8]Wu H, Hou Y, Yang L. A Multi-Interaction Filtering Control Game Model for Close-in Shipborne Gun Weapon System. In: Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Machine Intelligence and Digital Applications; 30 May 2024; Ningbo, China. pp. 750–755. doi: 10.1145/3662739.3665688
[9]Li J, Mei Z, Shen Q, et al. Analysis on Core Capabilities and Key Technologies of Future Air Defense Anti-missile Operations. In: Long S, Dhillon BS (editors). Man-Machine-Environment System Engineering, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Springer; 2020. 645, pp. 1047–1054. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-6978-4_120
[10]Lyu C, Zhan R. Global Analysis of Active Defense Technologies for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine. 2022; 37(1): 6–31. doi: 10.1109/MAES.2021.3115205
[11]Pecht E, Tishler A, Weingold N. On the choice of multi-task r&d defense projects: A case study of the israeli missile defense system. Defence and Peace Economics. 2013; 24(5): 429–448. doi: 10.1080/10242694.2012.717205
[12]Hartlage B, Owen M, Frederick R, et al. Enhanced Counter Air Projectile. In: Proceedings of the 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit; 11 July 2004; Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA. doi: 10.2514/6.2004-4086
[13]Williams J, Brekke K, Patrick S, et al. Conceptual Design of a Guided Interceptor. In: Proceedings of the 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit; 10 July 2005; Tucson, AZ, USA. doi: 10.2514/6.2005-3847
[14]Fletcher JC. The technologies for ballistic missile defense. Issues in Science and Technology. 1984; 1(1): 15–29. Available online: www.jstor.org/stable/43308851
[15]Önder A. Projectile fragmentation and debris cloud formation behaviour of wavy plates in hypervelocity impact. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 2024; 183: 104788. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104788
[16]Abdulhamid H, Mespoulet J, Deconinck P. On The Effect of Projectile Material on Damage Induced to Single and Multi-Plate Target. In: Proceedings of the 2024 17th Hypervelocity Impact Symposium; 13 September 2024; Tsukuba, Japan. doi: 10.1115/HVIS2024-106
[17]Abdulhamid H, Mespoulet J, Deconinck P. On the effect of projectile material on damage induced to aluminum target under hypervelocity impact. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 2025; 202: 105326. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105326
[18]Xue Y, Zhang Q, Hao W, et al. Energy distribution characteristic of impact flash of metallic target impacted by hypersonic projectile. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 2024; 186: 104866. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104866
[19]Zong H-Z, Xu H-M, Zhang S-K, et al. A Review of the Application of Al/PTFE Reactive Materials in Damage and Defense Applications. Journal of Energetic Materials. 2025; 1–36. doi: 10.1080/07370652.2025.2495554
[20]Liu Z, Wu Q, Gao H, et al. Enhancing Whipple shield defense against hypervelocity impacts: Influence of impactor geometry and surface treatments. Advances in Space Research. 2025; 76(3): 1674–1691. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2025.05.041
[21]Williams P, Vinnikova S, Ahmed I, et al. Orbital Debris Cloud Propagation Simulation in Orbit. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation Forum and ASCEND 2025; 29 July 2025; Las Vegas, NA, USA. doi: 10.2514/6.2025-4007
[22]Peng XF, Xiang H, Liang JY, et al. Simulation and experimental analysis of explosive reactive armor collateral damage. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2024; 2891(4): 042007. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2891/4/042007
[23]Shu P, Zhao M, Li Z-Y, et al. Short-term evolution and risks of debris cloud stemming from collisions in geostationary orbit. Acta Astronautica. 2025; 228: 486–493. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.12.016
[24]Tian W, Du W, Zhang Z, et al. Experimental Investigation of Reaction-Induced Pressure Perturbations in PTFE/Al Composites During Shock Compression. Materials. 2025; 18(18): 4267. doi: 10.3390/ma18184267
[25]Veraar RG, Oosthuisen R, Andersson K. Ramjet Propulsion for Projectiles: An Overview of Worldwide Achievements and Future Opportunities. International Journal of Energetic Materials and Chemical Propulsion. 2022; 21(5): 1–61. doi: 10.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.2022038741
[26]Research Project Report Investigation of a Solid Fuel Ramjet Projectile. Available online: https://aerospace.technion.ac.il/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/project-Itamar-Levitan-final.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2025).
[27]Nagler J. On Thermoelastic Impact Modelling of Frozen Composite Target During Pre – Heated Projectile Penetration Starts of Motion. PROOF. 2024; 4: 26–68. doi: 10.37394/232020.2024.4.4
[28]Patel P, Hull TR, McCabe RW, et al. Mechanism of thermal decomposition of poly (ether ether ketone) (PEEK) from a review of decomposition studies. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2010; 95(5): 709–718. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.01.024
[29]Solution of the Boundary Layer Equations for a Rotating Cone in Supersonic Flow. Available online: https://aerospace.technion.ac.il/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Shahaf_Haiman-PROJECT.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2025).
[30]Shock-Fitting Computational Method for the Inviscid Blunt-Body Problem. Available online: https://aerospace.technion.ac.il/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Shock-Fitting-Computational-Method-for-the-Inviscid-Blunt-Body-Problem-%D7%90%D7%99%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%94-%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%9C%D7%9E%D7%9F.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2025).




