The SG6043 airfoil optimization for low Reynolds number applications in wind turbines

  • Hossein Seifi Davari Ocean Engineering Department, Chabahar Maritime University, Chabahar 99717, Iran
  • Mohammad Yaghoub Abdollahzadeh Jamalabadi Ocean Engineering Department, Chabahar Maritime University, Chabahar 99717, Iran
  • Mohsen Seify Davari Germi Department, Islamic Azad University, Germi 56911, Iran
Article ID: 2486
Keywords: modified airfoil; Reynolds numbers; aerodynamic; lift-to-drag; optimization; XFOIL software

Abstract

This study focuses on optimizing the SG6043 airfoil for small wind turbines (SWTs) operating at low Reynolds numbers (Re = 100,000 to 600,000). Using XFOIL software, 71 airfoils were analyzed, and the SG6043 airfoil demonstrated the highest lift-to-drag ratio (CL/CD). Three modified airfoils were designed by varying the thickness-to-camber ratio (t/c) between 0.5 and 1.5. The SG6043 modified 1 airfoil achieved a maximum CL/CD of 184.85 at Re = 600,000, outperforming other airfoils. These findings provide valuable insights for designing more efficient SWTs for low wind speed applications. At first, 71 airfoils, including some symmetrical National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) 4-digit, NACA 5-digit, Eppler series, Selig series, and other airfoils with higher aerodynamic performance at Reynolds numbers (Re) of 100,000 to 600,000 (the operation range for small wind turbines, SWTs), were chosen and analyzed in XFOIL software to determine their lift-to-drag ratio (CL/CD). The results showed that the SG6043 airfoil had the highest maximum CL/CD when compared to the other airfoils. To investigate and enhance the shape modification of the airfoil utilizing variations in thickness-to-camber ratio (t/c) and to determine the ideal t/c at Re of 100,000 to 600,000, the SG6043 airfoil was used. Based on the findings, 0.5 to 1.5 was the optimum t/c at Re of 100,000 to 600,000 for the development of the SG6043 airfoil, which had the maximum CL/CD. Then, three airfoils with varying thicknesses and cambers were designed and analyzed at the mentioned Re, with the optimal t/c being between 0.5 and 1.5. The findings indicated that when the Re increased, the SG6043 modified airfoil’s aerodynamic efficiency enhanced. SG6043 modified 1 airfoil presented the greatest CL/CD of 184.85 at a Re of 600,000. For the SG6043 modified 2 airfoil, the maximum stall angle (AoAstall) of 13° was demonstrated for Re of 300,000 to 600,000. Maximum CL/CD values for SG6043 modified 1, SG6043 modified 3, and SG6043 modified 2 were 184.85, 182.36, and 177.25, respectively. SG6043 modified 2, SG6043 modified 1, and SG6043 modified 3 had peak lift coefficients (CL) of 1.798, 1.79, and 1.788, respectively. SG6043 modified airfoils performed well in the drag bucket when initial lift increases were accompanied by either steady or decreasing drag.

Published
2025-04-08
How to Cite
Davari, H. S., Jamalabadi, M. Y. A., & Davari, M. S. (2025). The SG6043 airfoil optimization for low Reynolds number applications in wind turbines. Mechanical Engineering Advances, 3(2), 2486. https://doi.org/10.59400/mea2486
Section
Article

References

[1]Seifi H, Kouravand S, Davary MS, Mohammadzadeh S. Numerical and Experimental study of the effect of increasing aspect ratio of self-starting force to vertical axis wind turbine. Journal of Renewable and New Energy. 2023; 10(1): 1–14. doi: 10.52547/jrenew.10.1.1

[2]Singh RK, Ahmed MR. Blade design and performance testing of a small wind turbine rotor for low wind speed applications, Renewable Energy. 2013; 50: 812–819. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.08.021

[3]Akour SN, Al-Heymari M, Ahmed T, Khalil KA. Experimental and theoretical investigation of micro wind turbine for low wind speed regions. Renewable Energy. 2018; 116: 215–223. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.076

[4]Seifi Davari H, Kouravand S, Seify Davari M, Kamalnejad Z. Numerical investigation and aerodynamic simulation of Darrieus H-rotor wind turbine at low Reynolds numbers. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 2023; 45(3): 6813–6833. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2023.2213670

[5]Giguere P, Selig MS. Low Reynolds number airfoils for small horizontal axis wind turbines. Wind Engineering. 1997; 367–380.

[6]Akram MT, Kim MH. Aerodynamic shape optimization of NREL S809 airfoil for wind turbine blades using Reynolds-averaged navier stokes model—Part II. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11: 2211. doi: 10.3390/app11052211

[7]Longtin Martel S, Bashir M, Botez RM, Wong T. A Pareto Multi-Objective Optimization of a Camber Morphing Airfoil using Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm. In: Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum; 23–27 January 2023; National Harbor, MD, USA. p. 1583.

[8]Wu X, Zhang W, Peng X, Wang Z. Benchmark aerodynamic shape optimization with the POD-based CST airfoil parametric method. Aerospace Science and Technology. 2019; 84: 632–640. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.08.005

[9]Tirandaz MR, Rezaeiha A. Effect of airfoil shape on power performance of vertical axis wind turbines in dynamic stall: Symmetric Airfoils. Renewable Energy. 2021; 173: 422–441. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.142

[10]Huang S, Hu Y, Wang Y. Research on aerodynamic performance of a novel dolphin head-shaped bionic airfoil. Energy. 2021; 214: 118179. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118179

[11]Osei EY, Opoku R, Sunnu AK, Adaramola MS. Development of high performance airfoils for application in small wind turbine power generation. Journal of Energy. 2020; 1–9. doi: 10.1155/2020/9710189

[12]Osei EY, Opoku R, Sunnu AK, et al. Aerodynamic performance characteristics of EYO-Series low Reynolds number airfoils for small wind turbine applications. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2022; 61: 12301–12310. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.05.049

[13]Hu H, Zhang G, Li D, et al. Shape optimization of airfoil in ground effect based on free-form deformation utilizing sensitivity analysis and surrogate model of artificial neural network. Ocean Engineering. 2022; 257: 111514. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111514

[14]Santos GB, Pantaleão AV, Salviano LO. Using deep generative adversarial network to explore novel airfoil designs for vertical-axis wind turbines. Energy Conversion and Management. 2023; 282: 116849. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116849

[15]Achour G, Sung WJ, Pinon-Fischer OJ, Mavris DN. Development of a conditional generative adversarial network for airfoil shape optimization. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum; 6–10 January 2020; Orlando, FL, USA. p. 2261.

[16]Lim H, Kim H. Multi-objective airfoil shape optimization using an adaptive hybrid evolutionary algorithm. Aerospace Science and Technology. 2019; 87: 141–153. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.02.016

[17]Guo G, Zhu W, Sun Z, et al. Drag reducer design of wind turbine blade under flap-wise fatigue testing. Composite Structures. 2023; 318: 117094. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117094

[18]Boudis A, Hamane D, Guerri O, Bayeul-Lainé AC. Airfoil Shape Optimization of a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blade using a Discrete Adjoint Solver. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics. 2023; 16(4): 724–738. doi: 10.47176/JAFM.16.04.1493

[19]Echavarria C, Hoyos JD, Jimenez JH, et al. Optimal airfoil design through particle swarm optimization fed by CFD and XFOIL. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering. 2022; 44(11): 561. doi: 10.1007/s40430-022-03866-4

[20]Rangriz S, Kheiri M. Design of optimal airfoils for airborne wind energy applications. In: Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum; 23–27 January 2023; National Harbor, MD, USA. p. 1155.

[21]Kumar S, Narayanan S. Airfoil thickness effects on flow and acoustic characteristics. Alexandria Eng. J. 2022; 61: 4679–4699. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.10.022

[22]Song Q, Lubitz WD. Design and testing of a new small wind turbine blade. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering. 2014; 136(3): 4. doi: 10.1115/1.4026464

[23]Akuffo FO, Brew-Hammond A, Antonio J, et al. Solar and Wind Energy Resource Assessment (SWERA). Energy Commission Ghana; 2003.

[24]Bai CJ, Wang WC, Chen PW, Chong WT. System integration of the horizontal-axis wind turbine: The design of turbine blades with an axial-flux permanent magnet generator. Energies. 2014; 7(11): 7773–7793. doi: 10.3390/en7117773

[25]Renganathan SA, Maulik R, Ahuja J. Enhanced data efficiency using deep neural networks and Gaussian processes for aerodynamic design optimization. Aerospace Science and Technology. 2021; 111: 106522. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106522

[26]Acarer S. Peak lift-to-drag ratio enhancement of the DU12W262 airfoil by passive flow control and its impact on horizontal and vertical axis wind turbines. Energy. 2020; 201: 117659. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117659

[27]Wei X, Wang X, Chen S. Research on parameterization and optimization procedure of Low-Reynolds-number airfoils based on genetic algorithm and Bezier curve. Advances in Engineering Software. 2020; 149: 102864. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.102864

[28]Singh RK, Ahmed MR, Zullah MA, Lee Y. Design of a low Reynolds number airfoil for small horizontal axis wind turbines. Renewable Energy. 2012; 42: 66–76. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.09.014

[29]Giguere P, Selig MS. New airfoils for small horizontal axis wind turbines. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 1998; 120: 108–114. doi: 10.1115/1.2888052

[30]Meana-Fernández A, Díaz-Artos L, Fernández Oro JM, Velarde-Suárez S. An optimized airfoil geometry for vertical-axis wind turbine applications. International Journal of Green Energy. 2020; 17: 181–195. doi: 10.1080/15435075.2020.1712211