Conceptualizing parenthood: American newspaper discourse analysis
Abstract
This study aims to elucidate the metaphorical representations of the concept PARENT within American media discourse. By analyzing the conceptual metaphors employed in newspaper discourse, we seek to reconstruct the metaphorically derived understanding of parenthood within English-speaking community. These conceptual metaphors, crafted by media presenters, exert a profound influence on the societal comprehension of this concept, both directly and indirectly. The study draws upon the Conceptual Metaphor theory, Conceptual Integration theory, and Discourse analysis. Within the scope of our investigation, the target domain PARENT encompasses four primary source domains: DUTIES, DIFFICULTIES, OWNER, and BURDEN. Our emphasis lies in scrutinizing the cross-domain mappings, which delineate systematic correspondences between the target and source domains. We investigate novel conceptualizations that emerge from conventional metaphoric patterns, employing cognitive mechanisms such as extension, elaboration, questioning, and combination. We also explore the conceptual blends and emergent structures that introduce additional layers of interpretation of being a parent. They are elucidated using Conceptual Integration Networks, specifically double- and multiple-scope models. Our analysis has unveiled the existence of four metaphorical clusters, each providing unique perspectives on how parenthood is conceptualized within the newspaper discourse.
References
Anderson D, Hamilton M (2005). Gender Role Stereotyping of Parents in Children’s Picture Books: The Invisible Father. Sex Roles. 52(3): 145–151. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-1290-8
Amareih AH (2022). COVID-19 IS WAR, WATER &APERSON: Metaphorical Language of the Coronavirus Disease in “the Jordan Times” Newspaper. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 12(7): 1286-1293. doi: 10.17507/tpls.1207.06
Bilyk O, Bylytsia U, Doichyk O, et al. (2022). COVID-19 metaphoric blends in media discourse. Studies about Languages/Kalbų studijos. 40: 17–33. doi: 10.5755/j01.sal.1.40.30155
Bryant JA (2001). Television and the American Family. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781410600172
Bystrov Y (2014). Fractal metaphor LIFE IS A STORY in biographical narrative. Topics in Linguistics. 14(1): 1-8. doi: 10.2478/topling-2014-0007
Cameron L (2008). Metaphor and Talk. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. pp. 197–211. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.013
Chan K, Tufte B, Cappello G, et al. (2011). Tween girls’ perception of gender roles and gender identities: A qualitative study. Young Consumers. 12(1): 66–81. doi: 10.1108/17473611111114795
Charteris-Black J (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, London. doi: 10.1057/9780230000612_12
Chiang WY, Duann RF (2007). Conceptual metaphors for SARS: “war” between whom? Discourse & Society. 18(5): 579-602. doi: 10.1177/0957926507079631
Coulson S (2001). Semantic Leaps: Frame-shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511551352
Croft W, Cruse DA (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
Fauconnier G, Turner M (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science. 22(2): 133-187. doi: 10.1207/ s15516709cog2202_1
Fauconnier G, Turner M (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books.
Fauconnier J, Turner M (2008). Rethinking Metaphor. In: Gibbs R (editor). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press. pp. 53–66. doi: 10.1017/ CBO9780511816802.005
Fogel JM (2012). A modern family: The performance of “family” and familialism in contemporary television series. University of Michigan.
Gerber G, Gross L, Morgan M, et al. (1980). Media and the Family: Images and Impact. Available online: https://web.asc.upenn.edu/gerbner/Asset.aspx?assetID=437 (accessed on 9 September 2023).
Grady J (2007). Metaphor. In: Geeraerts D, Cuyckens H (editors). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford University Press. pp.188–213.
Hu C, Xu Y (2017). WAR Metaphor in the Chinese Economic Media Discourse. Higher Education Studies. 7(1): 94-106. doi: 10.5539/hes.v7n1p94
Kaufman G (1999). The Portrayal of Men’s Family Roles in Television Commercials. Sex Roles. 41(5): 439–458. doi:10.1023/A:1018878917810
Kövecses Z (2010a). Metaphor and culture. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: Philologica. 2: 197-220.
Kövecses Z (2010b). Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Kövecses Z (2015a). Metaphor and emergentism. In: MacWhinney B, O’Grady W (editors). The Handbook of Language Emergence. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 147-162. doi: 10.1002/9781118346136.ch6
Kövecses Z (2015b). Where Metaphors Come from: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:o¬so/9780190224868.001.0001
Krennmayr T (2011). Metaphor in newspapers [PhD thesis]. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. LOT. Available online: https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/metaphor-in-newspapers (accessed on 1 November 2023).
Kulchytska O, Malyshivska I (2022). A Contemporary Free Verse from American and Ukrainian Readers’ Perspectives. Respectus Philologicus. 42(47): 76–93. doi: 10.15388/RESPECTUS.2022.42.47.110
Lakoff G (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In: Ortony A (editor). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press. pp. 202-251. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980). Metaphors We Live by. University of Chicago Press.
Linh H (2011). A Study of Metaphor in Newspapers: English versus Vietnamese [PhD thesis]. University of Danang, Vietnam. Available online: https://kipdf.com/a-study-of-metaphor-in-newspapers-english-versus-vietnamese-danang-this-thesis-h_5b1549207f8b9ad3918b4569.html (accessed on 1 November 2023).
Miller D, Dinan W (2009). Journalism, public relations and spin. In: Wahl-Jorgense K, Hanitzsch T (editors). Handbook of Journalism Studies. Routledge. pp. 250-264.
Philo G (2008). Active audiences and the construction of public knowledge. Journalism Studies. 9(4): 535-544. doi: 10.1080/14616700802114217
Podnieks E (2012). Mediating Moms: Mothers in Popular Culture. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Riggs JM (1997). Mandates for mothers and fathers: Perceptions of breadwinners and caregivers. Sex Roles. 37(7/8): 565–580. doi: 10.1023/a:1025611119822
Semino E (2021). “Not soldiers but fire-fighters”–Metaphors and Covid-19. Health Communication. 36(1): 50-58. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989
Stewart SD (1999). Disneyland Dads, Disneyland Moms? Journal of Family Issues. 20(4): 539–556. doi: 10.1177/019251399020004006
van Dijk T (2002). Discourse, ideology and context. Journal of Asian Economics. 35: 11-40. doi: 10.1515/flin.2001.35.1-2.11
van Dijk TA (1998). Ideology: a Multidisciplinary Approach. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Vavrus MD (2002). Domesticating patriarchy: Hegemonic masculinity and television’s “Mr. Mom”. Critical Studies in Media Communication. 19(3): 352–375. doi: 10.1080/07393180216564
Velykoroda Y (2019). Conceptual metaphorization through precedent-related phenomena in media discourse. Studies about Languages/Kalbų studijos. 34: 132–145. doi: 10.5755/j01.sal.34.0.22088
Zeng WH, Ahrens K (2023). Corpus-Based Metaphorical Framing Analysis: WAR Metaphors in Hong Kong Public Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol. 38(3); 254-274. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2022.2158088
Copyright (c) 2024 author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author(s) warrant that permission to publish the article has not been previously assigned elsewhere.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher right for the first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under:
OA - Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows for the copying, distribution and transmission of the work, provided the correct attribution of the original creator is stated. Adaptation and remixing are also permitted.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access to, as well as the unrestricted reuse of, original works of all types.
_%E5%89%AF%E6%9C%AC1.png){kind=logo}
