A social-cognitive research on metaphor and metonymy: Taking age appellations in Chinese as an example
Abstract
The process from individual language to communal language, from individual experience to communal embodiment, and from individual cognition to collective cognition is based on human embodiment and social interactions. Metaphor and metonymy are two basic cognitive approaches to the world. Thus, human cognition is metaphorical and metonymic in essence, and metaphonymy is embodied and social in nature. In the perspective of social embodied cognition, this paper, taking social metaphonymy as a theoretical foundation and the Chinese age appellations as the corpus, demonstrates that Chinese age appellation has eight metaphonymic categories, namely, physiology, gender, wisdom, accessories, raising, behavior, animal and plant, and number. The paper, by expounding the embodiment and metaphonymy, aims to reveal metaphonymic cognitive mechanism of Chinese age appellations.
References
[1] An Y (1987) An etymological studies on ancient age appellations. Journal of Pictorial 3: 74–76.
[2] Chen F (1984) A research on ancient age appellations. Literature and History 10: 73–74.
[3] Cheng X (2009) Construction of subjectivity and intersubjectivity from the perspective of the philosophy of language. Foreign Language Research 1: 9–15.
[4] Lindblom J (2015) Embodied Social Cognition. New York/London: Springer.
[5] Lakoff G and Johnson M (1980) Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
[6] Lakoff G and Johnson M (1999) Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
[7] Lantolf J and Qin L (2018) Social-cultural theory: Philosophical foundations, disciplinary property and research methodology. Foreign Language and Their Teaching 1: 1–18.
[8] Lu S (2018) The History of Chinese Culture. Beijing: Beijing Daily Press.
[9] Ma L (2007) An etymological studies on age appellations in Chinese. Journal of Zhejiang Education College 5: 53–58.
[10] Panther K and Radden G (2002) Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
[11] Shapiro L (2019) Embodied Cognition. London/New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
[12] Shen J (2009) Subjectivity of Chinese and the teaching of Chinese grammar. Chinese Language Learning 2: 3–12.
[13] Wang Y (2014) Embodied-cognitive linguistics in the viewpoint of postmodernism. Foreign Language and Literature 6: 61–67.
[14] Wang Y (2015) The theoretical exploration and practical value of embodied-cognitive monism: A new thought on philosophy of mind. Foreign Language of China 2: 24–31.
[15] Wen X (2019) Sociocognitive linguistics based on social cognition. Modern Foreign Languages 3: 293–304.
[16] Winter B (2019) Sensory Linguistics: Language, Perception and Metaphor. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
[17] Zhao Y (2015) A study on cognitive sociolinguistics under the post-modernistic view. Foreign Language Research 4: 65–70.
[18] Zlatev J (2007) Embodiment, language, and mimesis. In: Geeraerts D, Dirven R and Taylor JR. (eds.) Body, Language and Mind (Volume 1): Embodiment. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.297–337.
Copyright (c) 2022 author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author(s) warrant that permission to publish the article has not been previously assigned elsewhere.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher right for the first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under:
OA - Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows for the copying, distribution and transmission of the work, provided the correct attribution of the original creator is stated. Adaptation and remixing are also permitted.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access to, as well as the unrestricted reuse of, original works of all types.
_%E5%89%AF%E6%9C%AC1.png){kind=logo}
