Using ethnography in politeness studies: A discursiveness-based approach
Abstract
The current study points out the methodological limitations of contemporary discursive politeness research and suggests that in-depth ethnographic data provides a potentially crucial solution. Discursive politeness studies advocate a data-driven, bottom-up analytical approach that stresses the importance of participants’ own contextual assessments. Analysis of such kind requires the corresponding methodological design which allows researchers to obtain the defining information that can be seemingly absent in the on-going interaction. However, in the current body of literature, politeness research focuses on theoretical discussion without specifically organised consideration regarding methodology. Therefore, aiming at providing a more valid methodological approach, the current study proposes to consider ethnography as the foundational data-collection method for discursive politeness research, stressing ‘long-term’ and ‘in-depth’ as the core features in conducting fieldwork.
In order to clarify this view, the current study demonstrates a case study via examining an interaction naturally occurring among several family members during dinner time in China. This interaction is examined on two levels respectively (i.e., based on demographic data and in-depth ethnographic data). This paralleled analysis reveals that in complicated real-life interactions, lacking of thorough contextual information of both cultural norms and individually shaped cognition can be misleading in analysis. Therefore, understanding (im)politeness as an interactionally situated contextual/cognitive judgement, long-term ethnography is needed and that the fieldwork should be conducted carefully and patiently in order to gain access to comparatively more solid data and achieve more valid conclusion.
References
Creese A (2008) Linguistic ethnography. In: King KA and Hornberger H (eds) Encyclopaedia of Language and Education (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Springer, pp.229–241.
Eelen G (2001) A critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
Eisenhart M (2001) Changing conceptions of culture and ethnographic methodology: Recent thematic shifts and their implications for research on teaching. In: Richardson V (ed) The Handbook of Research on Teaching (4th ed.). Washington: American Educational Research Association.
Gu Y (1990) Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatic (14): 237–257.
Hammersley M (2007) The issue of quality in qualitative research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 30(3): 287–305.
Lakoff R (1973) The logic of politeness; or, minding your p’s and q’s. In: Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. pp.292–305.
Leech G (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Leech G (2005) Politeness: Is there an East-West divide? Journal of Foreign Languages 160(6): 3–31.
Locher M and Watts R (2005) Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research (1): 9–33.
Rampton B, Tusting K, Maybin J, et al. (2004) UK linguistic ethnography: A discussion paper. UK Linguistic Ethnography Forum. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/display/20965856.
Spencer-Oatey H (2002) Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics (34): 529–545.
Spencer-Oatey H (2005) (Im)politeness, face, and perceptions of rapport: unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1(1): 95–119.
Spencer-Oatey H (ed) (2008) Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.
Tekourafi M (2002) Politeness and formulaicity: Evidence from Cypriot Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics (3): 179–201.
Tekourafi M (2003) Beyond the micro-level in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1(2): 237–262.
Wang H (2008) (Im)politeness in casual conversations among female Mandarin speakers: A practice-based perspective. PhD Thesis, The university of Texas at Arlington.
Watts RJ (2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Copyright (c) 2019 author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author(s) warrant that permission to publish the article has not been previously assigned elsewhere.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher right for the first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under:
OA - Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows for the copying, distribution and transmission of the work, provided the correct attribution of the original creator is stated. Adaptation and remixing are also permitted.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access to, as well as the unrestricted reuse of, original works of all types.
_%E5%89%AF%E6%9C%AC1.png){kind=logo}
