The cognitive-functional properties of English WH-dialogic constructions in discourse

  • Guocai Zeng College of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Sichuan University
Ariticle ID: 576
29 Views, 23 PDF Downloads
Keywords: WH-dialogic constructions; event; schema-instance principle; cognitive model

Abstract

Within the theoretical frameworks of cognitive linguistics and cognitive construction grammar, this paper takes the pair of a WH-question and one of its answers in contemporary spoken English as the research object and regards such pairs as WH-dialogic constructions. In this study we construct an Event-based Schema-Instance Cognitive Model (ESI model) to analyze the cognitive-functional properties of this category of dialogic constructions. The discoursal expansion and textual cohesion in discourse achieved through the application of such dialogic constructions indicate that the usage of WH-dialogic constructions is one of the basic cognitive strategies for human beings to construe the objective world.  

References

[1] Baugh AC and Cable T (1978) A history of the English Language (3rd ed.). London, Boston and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

[2] Brône G and Zima E (2014) Towards a dialogic construction grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3): 457–495.

[3] Chomsky N (1957) Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.

[4] Chomsky N (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[5] Chomsky N (2013) Problems of projection. Lingua (130): 33–49.

[6] Croft W and Cruse DA (2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: CUP, pp.257–258.

[7] Davies M (2008-) The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. Available at: http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.

[8] Du Bois JW (2014) Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3): 359–410.

[9] Ginzburg J and Sag I (2000) Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning and Use of English Interrogatives. CSLI Publications, pp.185.

[10] Goldberg AE (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, pp.4.

[11] Goldberg AE (2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP, pp.3,177.

[12] Hamblin CL (1973) Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10(1): 41–43.

[13] Halliday MAK (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold, pp.45–46.

[14] Langacker RW (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, pp.371.

[15] Langacker RW (1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, pp.505–506.

[16] Langacker RW (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP, pp.457,466.

[17] Langacker RW (2009) Investigations in Cognitive Gramma. Mouton de Gruyter, pp.235.

[18] Lehnert W (1997) Human and computational question answering. Cognitive Science (1): 37–73.

[19] Taylor J (1989) Linguistic Categorization—Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: OUP, pp.59.

[20] Taylor J (2002) Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: OUP, pp.125.

[21] Thomson AJ and Martinet AV (1986) A Practical English Grammar. Oxford: OUP, pp.71–74.

[22] Zeng G (2015) A cognitive approach to the event structures of grammatical constructions. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University (1): 38–42.

[23] Zeng G (2016) A cognitive approach to the event structures of WH-dialogic constructions. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies (4): 311–324.

[24] Zeng G (2018a) Book review: The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. Discourse Studies (6): 813–815.

[25] Zeng G (2018b) The dialogic turn in cognitive linguistics studies: From minimalism, maximalism to dialogicalism. Cogent Education (Taylor & Francis) (5): 1537907. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1537907.

Published
2019-09-01
How to Cite
Zeng, G. (2019). The cognitive-functional properties of English WH-dialogic constructions in discourse. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.18063/FLS.v1i1.1080
Section
Article