OPTIMIZING MAINTENANCE STRATEGIES OF COIL SHOP: A DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION APPROACH
Abstract
This paper presents a control process of reliability models for key subsystems in a coil shop by advanced differential equations approach. The goal is to optimize the maintenance scheduling process for the critical subsystems, enabling the system to operate at maximum efficiency. Maintenance strategies significantly influence this outcome, and selecting the right strategy is not trivial. The designed control process model can be applied by administrative setup in manufacturing concerns. The 3-state models here are developed for the dynamic behavior of the system under the impact of preventive maintenance strategies. Both maintenance and repair of the units are perfect. The numerical analysis of the system is also discussed to compare the behavior of the present model and the proposed models. The comparison helps in findings the production-affecting factors and addresses maintenance planning gaps for critical subsystems. This approach aims to optimize the entire manufacturing system, potentially increasing profitability.
References
[1]M. Aggarwal and A. Kumar, Analysis of repairable system with delayed, Replacement Microelectronics Reliability 21 (1979), 165-171.
[2]V. Andalib and J. Sarker, A repairable system supported by two spare units and serviced by two types of repairers, Journal of Statistical Theory and Application 20(2) (2021), 180-192. https://doi.org/10.2991/jsta.d.210611.001
[3]A. Bahl, A. Sachdeva and R. Garg, Availability analysis of distillery plant using Petri nets, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 35(10) (2018), 2373-2387. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-06-2017-0108
[4]G. V. Dijkhuizen and M. V. Heijden, Preventive-maintenance and the interval availability distribution of an unreliable production system, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 66(11) (1995), 1401-1413.
[5]M. Ebrahimi, S. M. T. Fatimi Ghomi and B. Karimi, Application of the preventive maintenance scheduling to increase the equipment reliability; Case study-bag filters in cement factory, Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization 16(1) (2020), 189-205.
[6]Fachri Husaini, Judi Alhilman and Nurdinintya Atharii, Proposed policy preventive maintenance machine moriseiki NH 4000 DCG method of reliability center maintenance (RCM) and risk based maintenance (RBM) case study PT Pudak scientific, International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System 2(2) (2018), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.25124/ijies.v2i02.20
[7]S. Garg, J. Singh and D. V. Singh, Availability analysis of crank case manufacturing system in a two-wheeler automobile industry, Applied Mathematical Modelling 34 (2010), 1672-1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2009.09.016
[8]B. Gnedenko and A. U. Igor, Probabilistic Reliability Engineering, 1995.
[9]B. Gnedenko and V. P. Igor, A. U. Igor and S. Chakravarty, Statistical Reliability Engineering, Ist Edition, 1999.
[10]D. Kumar, P. C. Pandey and J. Singh, Behavior analysis of paper production system with different repair policies, Microelectronics Reliability 31 (1991), 47-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-2714(91)90345-8
[11]M. Mehta, J. Singh and S. Sharma, Availability Analysis of an Industrial System using supplementary variable technique, Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering 12(4) (2018), 245-251.https://jjmie.hu.edu.jo/vol12-4/jjmie_26_18-01.pdf
[12]C. Mohamed, F. N. Mustapha and B. G. Stanley, Performance evaluation of a two-machine line with a finite buffer and condition-based maintenance, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 166 (2017), 61-72.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.034
[13]B. Oskadi, An optimal preventive maintenance model to enhance availability and reliability of flexible manufacturing systems, Journal of Industrial and System Engineering 11(2) (2018), 47-61.https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17358272.2018.11.2.4.6
[14]M. T. Todinav, Risk based reliability allocation and topological optimization based on minimizing the total cost, International Journal of Reliability and Safety 1(4) (2007), 489-512. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRS.2007.016261
