A Sound Quality Evaluation Method for Vehicle Interior Noise Based on Auditory Loudness Model

  • Zhiheng He School of Mechatronic Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China
  • Hui Guo School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, 201620, China
  • Houguang Liu School of Mechatronic Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China
  • Yu Zhao School of Mechatronic Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China; Auto Engineering Research Institute, BYD Auto Industry Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, 518118, China
  • Zipeng Zhang School of Mechatronic Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China
  • Shanguo Yang School of Mechatronic Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China
Article ID: 2648
Keywords: Sound quality evaluation; vehicle interior noise; auditory physiological model; psychoacoustic parameters

Abstract

When designing and optimizing the hull of vehicles, their sound quality needs to be considered, which greatly depends on the psychoacoustic parameters. However, the traditional psychoacoustic calculation method does not consider the influence of the real human ear anatomic structure, even the loudness which is most related to the auditory periphery. In order to introduce the real physiological structure of the human ear into the evaluation of vehicle sound quality, this paper first carried out the vehicle internal noise test to obtain the experimental samples. Then, the physiological loudness was predicted based on an established human ear physiological model, and the noise evaluation vector was constructed by combining the remaining four psychoacoustic parameters. Finally, the evaluation vector was fitted into the subjective evaluation results of vehicle interior noise by a deep neural network. The results show that our proposed method can estimate the human subjective perception of vehicle interior noise well.

References

[1]Singh, S., Mohanty, A. (2018). HVAC noise control using natural materials to improve vehicle interior sound quality. Applied Acoustics, 140, 100–109.

[2]Ye, S. G., Zhang, J. H., Xu, B. (2018). Noise reduction of an axial piston pump by valve plate optimization. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 31(1), 1–16.

[3]Pamucar, D., Ecer, F., Deveci, M. (2021). Assessment of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainable road transportation of United States using integrated fuzzy FUCOM and neutrosophic fuzzy MARCOS methodology. Science of the Total Environment, 788, 147763.

[4]Qiu, Y., Zhou, E., Xue, H., Tang, Q., Wang, G. et al. (2021). Analysis on vehicle sound quality via deep belief network and optimization of exhaust system based on structure-SQE model. Applied Acoustics, 171, 1–13.

[5]Liang, K., Zhao, H. (2019). Automatic evaluation of internal combustion engine noise based on an auditory model. Shock and Vibration, 2019, 298219.

[6]Moon, S., Park, S., Park, D., Yun, M., Chang, K. et al. (2020). Active sound design development based on the harmonics of main order from engine sound. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 68(7/8), 532–544.

[7]Xie, X., Ma, Z., Ye, J., Zeng, F., Fan, W. et al. (2019). Research and development of sound quality in portable testing and evaluation system based on self-adaptive neural network. Applied Acoustics, 154, 138–147.

[8]Feng, T., Sun, Y., Wang, Y., Zhou, P., Guo, H. et al. (2019). Sound feature space effects on the performance of annoyance evaluation model based on support vector machine. Applied Acoustics, 154, 99–113.

[9]Zwicker, E., Fastl, H. (2013). Psychoacoustics: Facts and models. Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.

[10]Di, G. Q., Chen, X. W., Song, K., Zhou, B., Pei, C. M. (2016). Improvement of Zwicker’s psychoacoustic annoyance model aiming at tonal noises. Applied Acoustics, 105, 164–170.

[11]Wang, Y., Shen, G., Xing, Y. (2014). A sound quality model for objective synthesis evaluation of vehicle interior noise based on artificial neural network. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 45(1), 255–266.

[12]Wang, Z., Li, P., Liu, H., Yang, J., Liu, S. et al. (2021). Objective sound quality evaluation for the vehicle interior noise based on responses of the basilar membrane in the human ear. Applied Acoustics, 172, 107619.

[13]Feng, B., Gan, R. Z. (2004). Lumped parametric model of the human ear for sound transmission. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 3, 33–47.

[14]Pieper, I., Mauermann, M., Oetting, D., Kollmeier, B., Ewert, S. D. (2018). Physiologically motivated individual loudness model for normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(2), 917–930.

[15]Pieper, I., Mauermann, M., Kollmeier, B., Ewert, S. D. (2016). Physiological motivated transmission-lines as front end for loudness models. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 139(5), 2896–2910.

[16]ISO (1980). ISO 5128:1980. In: Acoustics-measurement of noise inside motor vehicles. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

[17]Jiang, J., Li, Y. (2018). Review of active noise control techniques with emphasis on sound quality enhancement. Applied Acoustics, 136, 139–148.

[18]ANSI (2007). ANSI S3.4-2007. In: Procedure for the computation of loudness of steady sounds. New York: American National Standard Insitute.

[19]Xue, L., Liu, H., Wang, W., Yang, J., Zhao, Y. et al. (2020). The role of third windows on human sound transmission of forward and reverse stimulations: A lumped-parameter approach. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(3), 1478–1490.

[20]Verhulst, S., Altoe, A., Vasilkov, V. (2018). Computational modeling of the human auditory periphery: Auditory-nerve responses, evoked potentials and hearing loss. Hearing Research, 360, 55–75.

[21]Hossen, M. S., Rabbi, F., Rahman, M. M. (2009). Adaptive particle swarm optimization (APSO) for multimodal function optimization. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 1(3), 98–103.

[22]ISO 226 (2003). Acoustics-normal equal-loudness contours. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

[23]Pastor-Aparicio, A., Segura-Garcia, J., Lopez-Ballester, J., Felici-Castell, S., Garcia-Pineda, M. et al. (2019). Psychoacoustic annoyance implementation with wireless acoustic sensor networks for monitoring in smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(1), 128–136.

[24]DIN (2009). DIN 45692:2009-08. In: Measurement technique for the simulation of the auditory sensation of sharpness. German: German Institute for Standardisation (Deutsches Institut für Normung).

[25]Daniel, P., Weber, R. (1997). Psychoacoustical roughness: Implementation of an optimized model. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 83(1), 113–123.

[26]Aures, W. (1985). Berechnungsverfahren für den sensorischen Wohlklang beliebiger Schallsignale. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 59(2), 130–141.

[27]Terhardt, E., Stoll, G., Seewann, M. (1982). Algorithm for extraction of pitch and pitch salience from complex tonal signals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71(3), 679–688.

[28]Osses Vecchi, A., García León, R., Kohlrausch, A. (2016). Modelling the sensation of fluctuation strength. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, pp. 1–8. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

[29]Aibara, R., Welsh, J. T., Puria, S., Goode, R. L. (2001). Human middle-ear sound transfer function and cochlear input impedance. Hearing Research, 152(1–2), 100–109.

[30]Nakajima, H. H., Dong, W., Olson, E. S., Merchant, S. N., Ravicz, M. E. et al. (2009). Differential intracochlear sound pressure measurements in normal human temporal bones. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 10(1), 23–36.

Published
2024-02-27
How to Cite
He, Z., Guo, H., Liu, H., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Z., & Yang, S. (2024). A Sound Quality Evaluation Method for Vehicle Interior Noise Based on Auditory Loudness Model. Sound & Vibration, 58(1), 045470. Retrieved from https://ojs.acad-pub.com/index.php/SV/article/view/2648
Section
Article