Innovative intelligent and expert system of bridges damage identification via wavelet packet energy curvature difference method integrated with artificial intelligence algorithms

  • Wael A. Altabey Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21544, Egypt
Article ID: 2372
Keywords: structural health monitoring (SHM); artificial intelligence (AI); wavelet packet energy curvature difference (WPECD); recurrent neural network with long short-term memory blocks (RNN-LSTM)

Abstract

Bridges are important infrastructure for highways. Monitoring their status is of great significance to ensure safe operations. In this work, a novel integrated technique from wavelet packet energy curvature difference (WPECD) and artificial intelligence (AI) for bridge damage identification is established. Initially, the damages are simulated in the bridge decks by changing the material stiffness reduction levels of bridge elements by three levels (5%, 10%, 15%) to study the effect of damage on the bridge response. Then the WPECD maps are plotted from vibration response before and after damage to the bridge for each stiffness reduction level. Unfortunately, given the nonlinearity of damage geometry, it is not easily feasible to use WPECD maps for damage identification accurately. Therefore, the (WPECD) maps are used for training a new architecture of recurrent neural networks with long short-term memory blocks (RNN-LSTM) for bridge damage identification by predicting the wavelet functions and wavelet decomposition layer effect of each node in the bridge. The effectiveness and reliability of the proposed approach were confirmed by numerical and experimental results. The performance of the proposed technique achieved high scores of accuracy, regression, and F-score equal to 93.58%, 90.43% and 88.17% respectively indicating the applicability of the proposed method for use on other important highway infrastructure.

References

[1]Koh BH, Dyke SJ. Structural health monitoring for flexible bridge structures using correlation and sensitivity of modal data. Computers & Structures. 2007; 85(3-4): 117-130. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.09.005

[2]Yu Y, Ma W. A Multi-Excitation Method of Damage Detection in Plate-Like Structure Based on Wavelet Packet Energy. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics. 2022; 22(08). doi: 10.1142/s0219455422500912

[3]Kim H, Melhem H. Damage detection of structures by wavelet analysis. Engineering Structures. 2004; 26(3): 347-362. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.10.008

[4]Moravvej M, El-Badry M. Reference-Free Vibration-Based Damage Identification Techniques for Bridge Structural Health Monitoring—A Critical Review and Perspective. Sensors. 2024; 24(3): 876. doi: 10.3390/s24030876

[5]Li ZD, He WY, Ren WX, et al. Damage detection of bridges subjected to moving load based on domain-adversarial neural network considering measurement and model error. Engineering Structures. 2023; 293: 116601. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116601

[6]Zhou L, Hong We, Altabey WA. Bridges Damage Assessment Techniques Improvement Through Machine Learning Algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Advances in Civil and Ecological Engineering Research; 2024. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-5716-3_6

[7]Guo D, Hong W, Altabey WA. Monitoring of Bridges Damage Based on the System Transfer Function Maps from Sensors Datasets. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Advances in Civil and Ecological Engineering Research; 2024. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-5716-3_5

[8]Yang YB, Chen L, Wang ZL, et al. Cancellation of resonance for elastically supported beams subjected to successive moving loads: Optimal design condition for bridges. Engineering Structures. 2024; 307: 117950. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117950

[9]Zhu XQ, Law SS. Wavelet-based crack identification of bridge beam from operational deflection time history. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 2006; 43(7-8): 2299-2317. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.07.024

[10]Wang ZL, Tan ZX, Chen L, et al. Internal and External Cancellation Conditions for Free Vibration of Damped Simple Beams Traversed by Successive Moving Loads. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics. 2023; 23(16n18). doi: 10.1142/s0219455423400072

[11]Oliver GA, Pereira JLJ, Francisco MB, et al. Wavelet transform-based damage identification in laminated composite beams based on modal and strain data. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures. 2023; 31(19): 4575-4585. doi: 10.1080/15376494.2023.2202016

[12]Hong W, Li H, Xu Y, et al. Damage identification in bridges based on WPECD transform. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development Proceedings; 2023. doi: 10.22616/erdev.2023.22.tf211

[13]Silik A, Wang X, Mei C, et al. Development of Features for Early Detection of Defects and Assessment of Bridge Decks. Structural Durability & Health Monitoring. 2023; 17(4): 257-281. doi: 10.32604/sdhm.2023.023617

[14]Xiao M, Zhang W, Zhao Y, et al. Fault diagnosis of gearbox based on wavelet packet transform and CLSPSO-BP. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2022; 81(8): 11519-11535. doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-12465-3

[15]Razavi M, Hadidi A. Structural damage identification through sensitivity-based finite element model updating and wavelet packet transform component energy. Structures. 2021; 33: 4857-4870. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.030

[16]Chen L, Lu X, Deng D, et al. Optimized Wavelet and Wavelet Packet Transform Techniques for Assessing Crack Behavior in Curved Segments of Arched Beam Bridges Spanning Rivers. Water. 2023; 15(22): 3977. doi: 10.3390/w15223977

[17]Ding Y, Li A, Miao C. Invistigation on structural damage method based on wavelet packet energy spectrum. Journal of Engneering Mechanics. 2006.

[18]Ouyang T, Cheng L, Li Y, et al. A novel damage identification method for arch bridge using symplectic geometry wavelet packet energy. Structures. 2024; 61: 105959. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.105959

[19]Pouyan F, Hosein N. Damage Severity Quantification Using Wavelet Packet Transform and Peak Picking Method. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction. 2021; 27(1). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000639

[20]Barbosh M, Sadhu A. Wavelet packet transformation-based improved acoustic emission method for structural damage identification. Smart Materials and Structures. 2024; 34(1): 015036. doi: 10.1088/1361-665x/ad9dc8

[21]Han J, Ren W, Sun Z. Experimental study on structural damage identification based on wavelet packet analysis. Journal of Vibration and Shock. 2006.

[22]Altabey WA, Noori M, Wu Z, et al. Enhancement of Structural Health Monitoring Framework on Beams based on k-Nearest Neighbor Algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (IWSHM 2023): Statistical Methods and Machine Learning; 2023.

[23]Moghadam KY, Noori M, Silik A, et al. Damage Detection in Structures by Using Imbalanced Classification Algorithms. Mathematics. 2024; 12(3): 432. doi: 10.3390/math12030432

[24]Altabey WA, Kouritem SA, Al-Moghazy MA. A new diagnostic system for damage monitoring of BFRP plates. e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy. 2023; 5: 100258. doi: 10.1016/j.prime.2023.100258

[25]Altabey WA, Kouritem SA, Al-Moghazy MA. Apply frequency response function schemes for damage detection in composite nanoscale-pipes under transient conditions. Nano-Structures & Nano-Objects. 2024; 39: 101259. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoso.2024.101259

[26]Altabey WA. A comprehensive study of a long-term creep thermo-mechanical fatigue behavior monitoring of BFRP composite pipeline using electrical capacitance sensors and deep learning algorithm. International Journal of Fatigue. 2024; 184: 108277. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108277

[27]Sun Z, Chang CC. structural damage assessment based on wavelet packet transform. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2002; 128(10): 1354-1361. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:10(1354)

[28]Karami V, Chenaghlou MR, Gharabaghi ARM. A combination of wavelet packet energy curvature difference and Richardson extrapolation for structural damage detection. Applied Ocean Research. 2020; 101: 102224. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2020.102224

[29]Hutter F, Hoos HH, Leyton-Brown K. Sequential model-based optimization for general algorithm configuration. In: Learning and Intelligent Optimization. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; 2011.

[30]Cha Y, Choi W, Büyüköztürk O. Deep Learning‐Based Crack Damage Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 2017; 32(5): 361-378. doi: 10.1111/mice.12263

[31]Teng S, Chen X, Chen G, et al. Structural damage detection based on convolutional neural networks and population of bridges. Measurement. 2022; 202: 111747. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111747

[32]Bao Y, Song C, Wang W, et al. Damage Detection of Bridge Structure Based on SVM. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2013; 2013: 1-7. doi: 10.1155/2013/490372

Published
2025-03-03
How to Cite
Altabey, W. A. (2025). Innovative intelligent and expert system of bridges damage identification via wavelet packet energy curvature difference method integrated with artificial intelligence algorithms. Sound & Vibration, 59(2), 2372. https://doi.org/10.59400/sv2372
Section
Article