Precise PMU locations on distribution system considering power system disruptions for elegant state estimation
Abstract
This study presents a novel approach to achieve complete system observability by optimizing the placement of Phasor Measuring Units (PMUs), reducing the risk of fault identification. The process considers both the redundancy and the cost of installation. The proposed solution methodology improves upon existing algorithms by utilizing the Butterfly Optimization Algorithm (BOA), which identifies optimal PMU locations. Resilient fault detection techniques are employed to detect and mitigate disruptions in the power grid swiftly. Addressing transmission line faults, the research integrates a Deep Learning Network (DLN) to enhance the state estimation process during fault conditions. Simulations of fault transients, including LG (Line-to-Ground), LLG (Line-to-Line-to-Ground), and LL (Line-to-Line) faults, are conducted using MATLAB Software. The Neural Network (NN) response is evaluated based on two key hyperparameters—the number of hidden layers and the number of neurons utilized for feature extraction. Results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method, with approximately 85% fault detection accuracy and a system performance metric of 90%. Additionally, the processing time required for training the network is small in the order of micro seconds.
References
Adhikari PM, Vanfretti L, Chang H, et al. Real-Time Control of a Battery Energy Storage System Using a Reconfigurable Synchrophasor-Based Control System. Energies. 2023; 16(19): 6909. doi: 10.3390/en16196909
Arefin AA. Application of the phasor measurement unit for protecting unintentional islanding of the distribution system. Power System Protection in Future Smart Grids. 2024: 109-132. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-323-91780-3.00005-2
Andic C, Ozturk A, Turkay B. A robust crow search algorithm based power system state estimation. Energy Reports. 2023; 9: 490-501. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.09.075
da Silva Pessoa AL, Oleskovicz M. Fault location algorithm for distribution systems with distributed generation based on impedance and metaheuristic methods. Electric Power Systems Research. 2023; 225: 109871. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2023.109871
Babu R, Gupta VK. Analysis of Bus Vulnerability Conducted Using a Synchronized Phasor Measurement Unit in Order to Achieve the Maximum Observability. Transactions on Energy Systems and Engineering Applications. 2023; 4(2): 1-23. doi: 10.32397/tesea.vol4.n2.523
Biswas S, Follum J, Etingov P, et al. An Open-Source Library of Phasor Measurement Unit Data Capturing Real Bulk Power Systems Behavior. IEEE Access. 2023; 11: 108852-108863. doi: 10.1109/access.2023.3321317
Zhou C, Zou G, Zheng M, et al. Reference Phasor-Based Data Self-Synchronization Scheme for Line Current Differential Protection in Active Distribution Networks. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. 2024; 15(2): 1466-1480. doi: 10.1109/tsg.2023.3313188
Chavez JJ, Kumar NV, Azizi S, et al. PMU-voltage drop based fault locator for transmission backup protection. Electric Power Systems Research. 2021; 196: 107188. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107188
Ciancetta F, Fioravanti A, Luiso M, et al. Performance of PMU in an electric distribution grid during transients. International Journal of Emerging Electric Power Systems. 2023; 25(5):709-721. doi: 10.1109/PQ.2019.8818247
Meenakshi Devi M, Geethanjali M. Hybrid of Genetic Algorithm and Minimum Spanning Tree method for optimal PMU placements. Measurement. 2020; 154: 107476. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107476
Ahmad F, Rasool A, Ozsoy E, et al. Distribution system state estimation-A step towards smart grid. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018; 81: 2659-2671. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.071
Duque FG, de Oliveira LW, de Oliveira EJ, et al. A cost-benefit multiobjective approach for placement of meters in electrical distribution systems. Electric Power Systems Research. 2021; 191: 106897. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106897
Dua GS, Tyagi B, Kumar V. Fault Detection Technique for Distribution Networks and Microgrids Using Synchrophasor Data. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 2023; 59(6): 7368-7381. doi: 10.1109/tia.2023.3305362
Hassini K, Fakhfakh A, Derbel F. Optimal Placement of μPMUs in Distribution Networks with Adaptive Topology Changes. Energies. 2023; 16(20): 7047. doi: 10.3390/en16207047
Im J, Ban J, Kim YJ, et al. PMU-Based Distributed State Estimation to Enhance the Numerical Stability Using Equality Constraints. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2024; 39(2): 4409-4421. doi: 10.1109/tpwrs.2023.3303230
Lee KY, Park JS, Kim YS. Optimal Placement of PMU to Enhance Supervised Learning-Based Pseudo-Measurement Modelling Accuracy in Distribution Network. Energies. 2021; 14(22): 7767. doi: 10.3390/en14227767
Lin W, Wang Q, Long J, et al. Optimization method of PMU placements base on costs and risk assessments of state estimation. Energy Reports. 2023; 9: 348-355. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.09.106
Mukherjee M, Roy BKS. Optimal ${rm{mu }}$PMU, PDC, and Communication Link Placement in Distribution Network Using Binary Carnivorous Plant Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 2023; 59(6): 7701-7715. doi: 10.1109/tia.2023.3304616
Rahman NHA, Zobaa AF. Optimal PMU placement using topology transformation method in power systems. Journal of Advanced Research. 2016; 7(5): 625-634. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2016.06.003
Theodorakatos NP, Moschoudis AP, Lytras MD, et al. Research on optimization procedure of PMU positioning problem achieving maximum observability based on heuristic algorithms. 11Th international conference on mathematical modeling in physical sciences. 2023; 2872: 120032. doi: 10.1063/5.0162934
Theodorakatos NP, Lytras MD, Kantoutsis KT, et al. Optimization-based optimal PMU placement for power state estimation and fault observability. 11Th international conference on mathematical modeling in physical sciences. 2023; 2872: 120033. doi: 10.1063/5.0162941
Pattanaik V, Malika BK, Rout PK, et al. Contingency-resilient PMU placement using Fuzzy Logic and Discrete Artificial Bee Colony algorithm for comprehensive network observability. e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy. 2023; 5: 100275. doi: 10.1016/j.prime.2023.100275
Peng J, Sun Y, Wang HF. Optimal PMU placement for full network observability using Tabu search algorithm. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2006; 28(4): 223-231. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2005.05.005
Ngo QH, Nguyen BLH, Vu TV, et al. State Estimation for Power Distribution System Using Graph Neural Networks. 2023 IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium (ESTS). Published online August 1, 2023. doi: 10.1109/ests56571.2023.10220523
Andreoni R, Macii D, Brunelli M, et al. Tri-Objective Optimal PMU Placement Including Accurate State Estimation: The Case of Distribution Systems. IEEE Access. 2021; 9: 62102-62117. doi: 10.1109/access.2021.3074579
Rashidi F, Abiri E, Niknam T, et al. Optimal placement of PMUs with limited number of channels for complete topological observability of power systems under various contingencies. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2015; 67: 125-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.11.015
Rezapour H, Jamali S, Bahmanyar A. Review on Artificial Intelligence-Based Fault Location Methods in Power Distribution Networks. Energies. 2023; 16(12): 4636. doi: 10.3390/en16124636
Sonal, Ghosh D. Novel trends in resilience assessment of a distribution system using synchrophasor application: A literature review. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems. 2021; 31(8). doi: 10.1002/2050-7038.12934
Todescato M, Carli R, Schenato L, et al. Smart Grid State Estimation with PMUs Time Synchronization Errors. Energies. 2020; 13(19): 5148. doi: 10.3390/en13195148
Tshenyego O, Samikannu R, Mtengi B, et al. A Graph-Theoretic Approach for Optimal Phasor Measurement Units Placement Using Binary Firefly Algorithm. Energies. 2023; 16(18): 6550. doi: 10.3390/en16186550
Basetti V, Chandel AK. Optimal PMU placement for power system observability using Taguchi binary bat algorithm. Measurement. 2017; 95: 8-20. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.09.031
Kong X, Wang Y, Yuan X, et al. Multi Objective for PMU Placement in Compressed Distribution Network Considering Cost and Accuracy of State Estimation. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(7): 1515. doi: 10.3390/app9071515
Naveenkumar K, Kannan R, Ganesan S, et al. Distribution system state estimation with stability assessment using bio-inspired computing. IET Sci Meas Techol 2021; 14(10): 1003–1013. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-smt.2020.0049
Raghuvamsi Y, Teeparthi K. A review on distribution system state estimation uncertainty issues using deep learning approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2023; 187: 113752. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113752
Ngo QH, Nguyen BLH, Vu TV, et al. Physics-informed graphical neural network for power system state estimation. Applied Energy. 2024; 358: 122602. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122602
Makhadmeh SN, Al-Betar MA, Abasi AK, et al. Recent Advances in Butterfly Optimization Algorithm, Its Versions and Applications. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. 2022; 30(2): 1399-1420. doi: 10.1007/s11831-022-09843-3
IEEE PES AMPS DSAS Test Feeder Working Group. Available Online: http://sites.ieee.org/pes-testfeeders/ (accessed on 2 September 2023).
Copyright (c) 2024 Puvikko Chezhian Vgopal, Subramanian Srikrishna, Ganesan Sivarajan, Naveenkumar Kaliyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.