Building sustainable libraries by embracing diversity and inclusion in Digital Era
Abstract
This study explores the dynamic relationship between sustainability, diversity, and inclusion within library contexts amidst the Digital Era. Conducted in May 2024 across various schools in Anambra State, Nigeria, the research targeted library users to assess their perspectives on sustainable practices and diversity strategies. Utilizing an easily accessible questionnaire deployed via Google Forms, data on sustainable initiatives and diversity measures were collected. Analysis conducted using SPSS included descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, ANOVA, and the Tukey post hoc test. Results reveal significant demographic variations in the effectiveness of diversity enhancement strategies, emphasizing the pivotal role of age, occupation, educational background, and gender in shaping library practices. The findings underscore the necessity of tailored interventions to promote sustainability and inclusivity in libraries, especially in the digital age where diverse perspectives and equitable access to information are crucial. Understanding the nuanced interplay between demographic factors and strategic initiatives allows libraries to better address the evolving needs of their communities, fostering environments that are both sustainable and inclusive.
References
[1]Ahammad N, Bahry FDS, Husaini H. Sustainable library services with open-source library automation and digitisation software: A literature review. Business Information Review. 2024; 41(2): 59-68. doi: 10.1177/02663821241245509
[2]Okojie V, Igbinovia MO. Global Perspectives on Sustainable Library Practices. IGI Global; 2022.
[3]Mathiasson MH, Jochumsen H. The Sustainable Library: A retrospective case study of a public library sharing initiative. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 2023. doi: 10.1177/09610006231190131
[4]Ndukwe CO, Edelugo SO, Ani IO. Effect of exposure of glass fibre reinforced polyester (GFRP) composite laminates to X-rays. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2018; 7(9): 31-38.
[5]Leong JHT. Patterns and trends of equity, diversity and inclusion programs in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2023; 49(4): 102738. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102738
[6]Walters WH. Assessing Diversity in Academic Library Book Collections: Diversity Audit Principles and Methods. Open Information Science. 2023; 7(1). doi: 10.1515/opis-2022-0148
[7]Wilson S, Smithson S, Crosby S, et al. Diversity, equity, and inclusion analysis tools for timely audits: Two case studies of Carlsbad libraries. School of Information Student Research Journal. 2024; 13(2): 20.
[8]Fischer J, Fedotova A, Jaki L, et al. Combining CRISPR-Cas-mediated terminal resolution with a novel genetic workflow to achieve high-diversity adenoviral libraries. Molecular Therapy—Methods & Clinical Development. 2024; 32(2): 101241. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2024.101241
[9]Foy CM. Successful Applications of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Programming in Various Professional Settings: Strategies to Increase DEI in Libraries. Journal of Library Administration. 2021; 61(6): 676-685. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2021.1947057
[10]Nwosu MC, Igwe KN, Nnadozie CO. Managing generational diversity in the workplace: Implications for the Digital Era university library management. International Journal of Applied Technologies in Library and Information Management. 2016; 2(2): 28-44.
[11]Milenia ND, Riady Y, Prasakti AW. Library Promotion Strategy in the Digital Era. LADU: Journal of Languages and Education. 2024; 4(1): 55-64. doi: 10.56724/ladu.v4i1.269
[12]Ani OI, Onoh GN, Akpor OJ, Ukpai CA. Design, development and performance evaluation of a mobile rice threshing machine. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Development. 2020; 10: 7-17.
[13]Yusuf F, Owolabi S, Aregbesola A, et al. Demographics, Socio-Economic and Cognitive Skills as Barriers to Information Seeking in a Digital Library Environment. In: Information Seeking Behavior and Challenges in Digital Libraries. IGI Global; 2016. pp. 179-202.
[14]Lygo-Baker S, Kinchin IM, Winstone NE, et al. Engaging Student Voices in Higher Education: Diverse Perspectives and Expectations in Partnership. Springer; 2019.
[15]Powers M, Costello L. Reaching Diverse Audiences with Virtual Reference and Instruction: A Practical Guide for Librarians. Rowman & Littlefield; 2019.
[16]Chetlen AL, Dell CM, Solberg AO, et al. Another Time, Another Space. Academic Radiology. 2017; 24(3): 273-285. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.08.030
[17]Papouli E. Diversity dolls: a creative teaching method for encouraging social work students to develop empathy and understanding for vulnerable populations. Social Work Education. 2018; 38(2): 241-260. doi: 10.1080/02615479.2018.1515904
[18]Lewis KR, Shah PP. Black students’ narratives of diversity and inclusion initiatives and the campus racial climate: An interest-convergence analysis. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. 2021; 14(2): 189-202. doi: 10.1037/dhe0000147
[19]Ani O, Ani A, Chukwuneke J. Spectrophotometric Data in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Antiretroviral Drug Coated Blood Interactions. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines. 2015; 03(08): 44-52. doi: 10.4236/jbm.2015.38005
[20]Spoelstra SL, Schueller M, Sikorskii A. Testing an implementation strategy bundle on adoption and sustainability of evidence to optimize physical function in community-dwelling disabled and older adults in a Medicaid waiver: a multi-site pragmatic hybrid type III protocol. Implementation Science. 2019; 14(1). doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0907-1
[21]Wiernik BM, Dilchert S, Ones DS. Age and Employee Green Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016; 7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00194
[22]Kunze F, Boehm S, Bruch H. Organizational Performance Consequences of Age Diversity: Inspecting the Role of Diversity‐Friendly HR Policies and Top Managers’ Negative Age Stereotypes. Journal of Management Studies. 2013; 50(3): 413-442. doi: 10.1111/joms.12016
[23]Ani O, Omenyi S, Achebe C. The Effects of Antiretroviral Drugs on the Absorbance Characteristics of HIV-Infected Blood. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering. 2015; 08(09): 571-581. doi: 10.4236/jbise.2015.89053
[24]Trelohan M. Do Women Engage in Pro-environmental Behaviours in the Public Sphere Due to Social Expectations? The Effects of Social Norm-Based Persuasive Messages. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 2021; 33(1): 134-148. doi: 10.1007/s11266-020-00303-9
[25]Shrestha B, Bajracharya SB, Keitsch MM, et al. Gender differences in household energy decision‐making and impacts in energy saving to achieve sustainability: A case of Kathmandu. Sustainable Development. 2020; 28(5): 1049-1062. doi: 10.1002/sd.2055
[26]Patton W, McMahon M. Career development and systems theory: Connecting theory and practice. In: Career Development and Systems Theory. Brill; 2021.
[27]Tavitiyaman P, Weerakit N, Ryan B. Leadership Competencies for Hotel General Managers: The Differences in Age, Education, and Hotel Characteristics. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration. 2014; 15(2): 191-216. doi: 10.1080/15256480.2014.901069
[28]Zacher H, Jimmieson NL, Bordia P. Time pressure and coworker support mediate the curvilinear relationship between age and occupational well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2014; 19(4): 462-475. doi: 10.1037/a0036995
[29]Rudolph CW, Rauvola RS, Costanza DP, et al. Generations and Generational Differences: Debunking Myths in Organizational Science and Practice and Paving New Paths Forward. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2020; 36(6): 945-967. doi: 10.1007/s10869-020-09715-2
[30]Langowitz NS, Elaine Allen I, Godwyn M. Early‐career outcomes and gender: can educational interventions make a difference? Gender in Management: An International Journal. 2013; 28(2): 111-134. doi: 10.1108/17542411311303248
[31]Akpebu Adjah O, Van der Walt T. Career progression of female librarians in public university libraries in Ghana. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 2017; 51(2): 331-345. doi: 10.1177/0961000617742445
[32]Griffin KA. Institutional barriers, strategies, and benefits to increasing the representation of women and men of color in the professoriate: Looking beyond the pipeline. In: Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Springer; 2019. pp. 1-73.
[33]Klašnja-Milićević A, Ivanović M. E-learning Personalization Systems and Sustainable Education. Sustainability. 2021; 13(12): 6713. doi: 10.3390/su13126713
[34]Ali M, French E. Age diversity management and organisational outcomes: The role of diversity perspectives. Human Resource Management Journal. 2019; 29(2): 287-307. doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12225
Copyright (c) 2024 Agatha Ujunwa Nnatu, Ngozi Njideka Okechukwu, Chinemerem Chika Jacinta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that the authors are given credit. With this license, authors hold the copyright.
