Exploring the efficiency and transparency in toxic and non-toxic perovskite solar cells by using SCAPS-1D

  • Abdul Haseeb Hassan Khan U.S.-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Energy, University of Engineering and Technology; Electronic and Communication Engineering, Anhui University
  • Hameed Ullah Electronic and Communication Engineering, Anhui University
  • Liping Li Electronic and Communication Engineering, Anhui University
  • Abdul Basit U.S.-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Energy, University of Engineering and Technology
  • Khadija Boughanbour Polydisciplinary Faculty, Ibn Zohr University
  • Sumayya Khan Health Care Administration, Northeastern University
  • Aimal Daud Khan U.S.-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Energy, University of Engineering and Technology
Ariticle ID: 283
220 Views, 127 PDF Downloads
Keywords: semitransparent, opaque, toxic perovskite solar cell, non-toxic perovskite solar cell, BIPV

Abstract

In the quest for sustainable energy solutions, we undertook a rigorous examination of both toxic and non-toxic perovskite solar cells (PSCs), assessing their potential across different absorber thicknesses and their viability within Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV). Our MAPbI3-based solar cell, utilizing TiO2 and Cu2O as electron and hole transport layers, respectively, exhibited an efficiency of 20.65% with a 400 nm opaque absorber. Interestingly, when this thickness was reduced to 200 nm, endowing the PSC with semitransparent properties, certain performance metrics altered, revealing insights crucial for BIPV integration. Further experiments with the toxic FAPbI3 absorber resulted in an efficiency of 23.37% for its 400 nm opaque variant. However, the semitransparent 200 nm layer presented distinct characteristics, emphasizing the complex interplay between thickness, transparency, and efficiency. Our exploration did not stop at toxic materials; we delved into non-toxic alternatives, MAGeI3 and RbGeI3. These variants produced efficiencies of 14.59% and 20.40% for their 400 nm configurations. Yet again, their 200 nm semitransparent counterparts showcased performance nuances. Synthesizing our findings, it becomes evident that semitransparent PSCs hold significant promise for BIPV applications, but achieving an optimal blend of efficiency, transparency, and architectural appeal demands further focused research.

References

[1] Kojima A, Teshima K, Shirai Y, et al. Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2009, 131(17): 6050–6051. doi: 10.1021/ja809598r

[2] Park NG. Organometal perovskite light absorbers toward a 20% efficiency low-cost solid-state mesoscopic solar cell. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2013, 4(15): 2423–2429. doi: 10.1021/jz400892a

[3] Snaith HJ. Perovskites: The emergence of a new era for low-cost, high-efficiency solar cells. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2013, 4(21): 3623–3630. doi: 10.1021/jz4020162

[4] Sun S, Salim T, Mathews N, et al. The origin of high efficiency in low-temperature solution-processable bilayer organometal halide hybrid solar cells. Energy & Environmental Science. 2014, 7(1): 399–407. doi: 10.1039/c3ee43161d

[5] Stranks SD, Eperon GE, Grancini G, et al. Electron-hole diffusion lengths exceeding 1 micrometer in an organometal trihalide perovskite absorber. Science. 2013, 342(6156): 341–344. doi: 10.1126/science.1243982

[6] Khan AHH, Basit S, Hameedullah. Improving the efficiency of lead-free non-toxic rubidium germanium iodide perovskite solar cell using a molybdenum disulfide interface layer: A SCAPS 1D simulation study. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science. 2023; 5(10): 1801–1804. doi: 10.56726/IRJMETS45496

[7] Barrows AT, Pearson AJ, Kwak CK, et al. Efficient planar heterojunction mixed-halide perovskite solar cells deposited via spray-deposition. Energy & Environmental Science. 2014, 7(9): 2944–2950. doi: 10.1039/c4ee01546k

[8] Vak D, Hwang K, Faulks A, et al. 3D printer based slot‐die coater as a lab‐to‐fab translation tool for solution‐processed solar cells. Advanced Energy Materials. 2014, 5(4). doi: 10.1002/aenm.201401539

[9] Kim JH, Williams ST, Cho N, et al. Enhanced environmental stability of planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells based on blade‐coating. Advanced Energy Materials. 2014, 5(4). doi: 10.1002/aenm.201401229

[10] NREL. Best research-cell efficiency chart. Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html (accessed on 22 December 2023).

[11] Li C, Lu X, Ding W, et al. Formability of ABX 3 (X = F, Cl, Br, I) halide perovskites. Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science. 2008, 64(6): 702–707. doi: 10.1107/s0108768108032734

[12] Eperon GE, Stranks SD, Menelaou C, et al. Formamidinium lead trihalide: A broadly tunable perovskite for efficient planar heterojunction solar cells. Energy & Environmental Science. 2014, 7(3): 982. doi: 10.1039/c3ee43822h

[13] Ono LK, Juarez-Perez EJ, Qi Y. Progress on perovskite materials and solar cells with mixed cations and halide anions. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2017, 9(36): 30197–30246. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b06001

[14] Saliba M, Matsui T, Seo JY, et al. Cesium-containing triple cation perovskite solar cells: Improved stability, reproducibility and high efficiency. Energy & Environmental Science. 2016, 9(6): 1989–1997. doi: 10.1039/c5ee03874j

[15] Pellet N, Gao P, Gregori G, et al. Mixed‐organic‐cation perovskite photovoltaics for enhanced solar‐light harvesting. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2014, 53(12): 3151–3157. doi: 10.1002/anie.201309361

[16] Park NG. Perovskite solar cells: An emerging photovoltaic technology. Materials Today. 2015, 18(2): 65–72. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2014.07.007

[17] De Wolf S, Holovsky J, Moon SJ, et al. Organometallic halide perovskites: Sharp optical absorption edge and its relation to photovoltaic performance. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2014, 5(6): 1035–1039. doi: 10.1021/jz500279b

[18] Chang YH, Park CH, Matsuishi K. First-principles study of the structural and the electronic properties of the lead-Halide-based inorganic-organic perovskites (CH~ 3NH~ 3) PbX~ 3 and CsPbX~ 3 (X= Cl, Br, I). Journal-Korean Physical Society. 2004; 44: 889–893.

[19] Kulkarni SA, Baikie T, Boix PP, et al. Band-gap tuning of lead halide perovskites using a sequential deposition process. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2014, 2(24): 9221–9225. doi: 10.1039/c4ta00435c

[20] Ding G, Zheng Y, Xiao X, et al. Sustainable development of perovskite solar cells: Keeping a balance between toxicity and efficiency. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2022, 10(15): 8159–8171. doi: 10.1039/d2ta00248e

[21] Liu M, Johnston MB, Snaith HJ. Efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells by vapour deposition. Nature. 2013, 501(7467): 395–398. doi: 10.1038/nature12509

[22] Burschka J, Pellet N, Moon SJ, et al. Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature. 2013, 499(7458): 316–319. doi: 10.1038/nature12340

[23] Chen C, Kang H, Hsiao S, et al. Efficient and uniform planar‐type perovskite solar cells by simple sequential vacuum deposition. Advanced Materials. 2014, 26(38): 6647–6652. doi: 10.1002/adma.201402461

[24] Schneider A, Alon S, Etgar L. Evolution of photovoltaic performance in fully printable mesoscopic carbon‐based perovskite solar cells. Energy Technology. 2019, 7(7). doi: 10.1002/ente.201900481

[25] U.S. Energy Information Administration. Residential energy consumption survey (RECS). Available online: https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/ (accessed on 22 December 2023).

[26] Zhang W, Anaya M, Lozano G, et al. Highly efficient perovskite solar cells with tunable structural color. Nano Letters. 2015, 15(3): 1698–1702. doi: 10.1021/nl504349z

[27] Xue Q, Xia R, Brabec CJ, et al. Recent advances in semi-transparent polymer and perovskite solar cells for power generating window applications. Energy & Environmental Science. 2018, 11(7): 1688–1709. doi: 10.1039/c8ee00154e

[28] Jeon NJ, Na H, Jung EH, et al. A fluorene-terminated hole-transporting material for highly efficient and stable perovskite solar cells. Nature Energy. 2018, 3(8): 682–689. doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0200-6

[29] Shen H, Duong T, Peng J, et al. Mechanically-stacked perovskite/CIGS tandem solar cells with efficiency of 23.9% and reduced oxygen sensitivity. Energy & Environmental Science. 2018, 11(2): 394–406. doi: 10.1039/c7ee02627g

[30] Service RF. Perovskite solar cells gear up to go commercial. Science. 2016, 354(6317): 1214–1215. doi: 10.1126/science.354.6317.1214

[31] Della Gaspera E, Peng Y, Hou Q, et al. Ultra-thin high efficiency semitransparent perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy. 2015, 13: 249–257. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.02.028

[32] Imran H, Durrani I, Kamran M, et al. High-performance bifacial perovskite/silicon double-tandem solar cell. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics. 2018, 8(5): 1222–1229. doi: 10.1109/jphotov.2018.2846519

[33] Ball JM, Stranks SD, Hörantner MT, et al. Optical properties and limiting photocurrent of thin-film perovskite solar cells. Energy & Environmental Science. 2015, 8(2): 602–609. doi: 10.1039/c4ee03224a

[34] Lie S, Bruno A, Wong LH, et al. Semitransparent perovskite solar cells with > 13% efficiency and 27% transperancy using plasmonic Au nanorods. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2022, 14(9): 11339–11349. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c22748

[35] Burgelman M, Nollet P, Degrave S. Modelling polycrystalline semiconductor solar cells. Thin Solid Films. 2000, 361–362: 527–532. doi: 10.1016/s0040-6090(99)00825-1

[36] Raoui Y, Ez-Zahraouy H, Tahiri N, et al. Performance analysis of MAPbI3 based perovskite solar cells employing diverse charge selective contacts: Simulation study. Solar Energy. 2019, 193: 948–955. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.10.009

[37] Karthick S, Velumani S, Bouclé J. Experimental and SCAPS simulated formamidinium perovskite solar cells: A comparison of device performance. Solar Energy. 2020, 205: 349–357. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.05.041

[38] Tariq Jan S, Noman M. Influence of layer thickness, defect density, doping concentration, interface defects, work function, working temperature and reflecting coating on lead-free perovskite solar cell. Solar Energy. 2022, 237: 29–43. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2022.03.069

[39] Pindolia G, Shinde SM, Jha PK. Optimization of an inorganic lead free RbGeI3 based perovskite solar cell by SCAPS-1D simulation. Solar Energy. 2022, 236: 802–821. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2022.03.053

[40] Tara A, Bharti V, Sharma S, et al. Device simulation of FASnI3 based perovskite solar cell with Zn(O0.3, S0.7) as electron transport layer using SCAPS-1D. Optical Materials. 2021, 119: 111362. doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2021.111362

[41] Son DY, Im JH, Kim HS, et al. 11% efficient perovskite solar cell based on ZnO nanorods: An effective charge collection system. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2014, 118(30): 16567–16573. doi: 10.1021/jp412407j

[42] Barbé J, Tietze ML, Neophytou M, et al. Amorphous Tin oxide as a low-temperature-processed electron-transport layer for organic and hybrid perovskite solar cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2017, 9(13): 11828–11836. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b13675

[43] Kim H, Lim KG, Lee TW. Planar heterojunction organometal halide perovskite solar cells: Roles of interfacial layers. Energy & Environmental Science. 2016, 9(1): 12–30. doi: 10.1039/c5ee02194d

Published
2024-01-09
How to Cite
Khan, A. H. H., Ullah, H., Li, L., Basit, A., Boughanbour, K., Khan, S., & Khan, A. D. (2024). Exploring the efficiency and transparency in toxic and non-toxic perovskite solar cells by using SCAPS-1D. Optoelectronics Reports, 1(1). Retrieved from https://ojs.acad-pub.com/index.php/OER/article/view/283