https://ojs.acad-pub.com/index.php/FPS/issue/feedForum for Philosophical Studies2024-12-13T02:46:26+00:00Managing Editoreditorial_office@acad-pub.comOpen Journal Systems<p><em>Forum for Philosophical Studies</em> (FPS) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal dedicated to scientific research and philosophical reflection concerning themes at the intersection of philosophical, scientific, technological, and cultural studies. The principal aim is to publish articles that are models of clarity and precision in dealing with significant philosophical issues. The readers of the journal will be kept abreast of the central issues and problems of contemporary analytic philosophy.</p>https://ojs.acad-pub.com/index.php/FPS/article/view/1386A systematic design for AI-centered innovation management network by Marxist epistemology2024-07-19T07:37:20+00:00Qing Luo457545867@qq.comHexiu Cao13129700489@163.com<p>By building AI-centered innovation management systems, innovative countries and organizations can optimize management processes, stimulate creativity, and accelerate product and service innovation cycles. AI-centered innovation management finds market in China. The application of Marxist Epistemology is applicable in breeding innovation knowledge, especially in defining AI-centered networks to guide innovation management, focusing on providing innovation conditions and the development of innovation relations. Furthermore, systematic entity of contradictions design is critical for AI-centered innovation management networks, unifying the systematic functions and structure by integrating AI into innovation management effectively.</p>2024-07-19T07:37:19+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Qing Luo, Hexiu Caohttps://ojs.acad-pub.com/index.php/FPS/article/view/1403Leaders (non-faculty) in higher education: A phenomenological study on understanding their role2024-10-29T07:36:17+00:00Saravanan Sathiyaseelanaviator.gs@gmail.com<p>The higher education fraternity associates itself closely to academia; the environment or community concerned with the pursuit of research and education. Unsurprisingly, the faculty receive more attention in areas surrounding higher education. However, recent days are seeing vast evolutions in the higher education landscape, beginning with an escalating interest in a seamless and capable administration to support, strengthen and elevate both research and education goals to greater heights. This study used a qualitative phenomenological approach to examine fifteen leaders (non-faculty) working in mid-senior level positions in a university in Singapore to understand their role. The findings evidently proved that leaders (non-faculty) are facilitators and enablers who perform and complete their tasks by facilitating activities, processes, events, and interactions (to and for both students and faculty), and enabling an activity or implementing a policy. Furthermore, the findings reinforced the importance of such leadership within the higher education sector, especially at a time universities explore new strategies to diversify and gain competitive advantage in a challenging environment marked by globalization, technological disruptions, unpredictable demand, and changing student needs.<b></b></p>2024-10-29T07:36:16+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Saravanan Sathiyaseelanhttps://ojs.acad-pub.com/index.php/FPS/article/view/1659Hitting or being right2024-12-13T02:46:26+00:00Cristián Pérez Garcíaperezgcristian@uniovi.es<p>In this paper, we study Gettier’s problem based on some recent bibliography and new research advances. First, we set the terms of the discussion and expose the core of the problem. Many disputes on this topic are rooted in misapprehensions of the concept of knowledge. Therefore, we give the most common definition of knowledge and show its structure. Then we look at Gettier’s two cases and propose a new example that helps us clarify the nature of the problem. We use a case of induction because it gathers all the epistemological problems together so that its solution may be considered a complete one. Finally, incorporating recent advances in epistemology, we propose a solution to Gettier’s problem. Some situations that fit in the common definition of knowledge do not seem to also fit under the word “knowledge.” Through the study of a hypothetical case, in this article we shall propose a solution to this dissonance.</p>2024-12-13T02:46:26+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Cristián Pérez García