Qualiomics: The metaphysics of consciousness

Alfredo  Pereira Jr.

doi:10.59400/fps.v1i1.489

Alfredo Pereira Jr. Philosophy Graduation Program and Department of Human and Nutritional Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Marília and Botucatu 18618-689, Brazil

Article ID: 489

206 Views, 76 PDF Downloads

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/fps.v1i1.489

Keywords: consciousness; sentience; qualia; Aristotelian forms; first-person perspective; being of reality

Abstract

Assuming that conscious experience happens in the first-person perspective the study of its contents cannot be made by using the methods of empirical and formal quantitative sciences, since singular qualitative personal experiences remain outside their scope. Departing from the concept of Sentient Consciousness advanced in the ontology of Triple-Aspect Monism, I propose that lived experiences of qualitative states (‘qualia’) are subject to a new, non-scientific field of study, Qualiomics, corresponding to the Metaphysics of Consciousness. The main thesis of Qualiomics is that personal direct experiences of ‘qualia’ are experiences of the being of reality, not epiphenomena. The method of Qualiomics is knowing by means of lived experiences of feeling, instead of learning from revealed truth or from representations of experiences. In this paper I review some philosophical precursors, arguing that it has an affinity with Post-Modern Metaphysics, to be distinguished from Pre-Modern (Onto-Teo-Logical) and Modern (apriori thinking, focused on representations and clarification of concepts) Metaphysics. The being of reality is conceived as the Aristotelian Katholou that makes itself present when we have direct experiences of the Form of individual substances. Qualiomics is close to Existential Phenomenology, but not a revival of Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty, because it is necessary to take into consideration that scientific and technological achievements impact on our lives and expand the repertoire of ‘qualia’ that we can experience. It is also close to J. J. Gibson’s Theory of Direct Perception, as well as Pragmatist and Enactivist approaches to consciousness.

References

[1]Pereira A Jr, Ricke H. What is consciousness? Towards a preliminar definition. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2009; 16(5): 28-45.

[2]Pereira A Jr. Triple-Aspect Monism: a conceptual framework for the science of human consciousness. In: Pereira A Jr, Lehmann D (editors). The Unity of Mind, Brain and World: current perspectives on a science of consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2013. pp. 299-337.

[3]Pereira A Jr. The Concept of Feeling in Triple Aspect Monism (Portuguese). Kinesis. 2015; 7(14): 1-24.

[4]Pereira A Jr. The Projective Theory of Consciousness: From neuroscience to philosophical psychology (Target Paper). Trans/Form/Ação. 2019; 41: 199-232. doi: 10.1590/0101-3173.2018.v41esp.11.p199

[5]Pereira A Jr. The Role of Sentience in the Theory of Consciousness and Medical Practice. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2021; 28(7-8): 22-50.

[6]Pereira A Jr, Nunn C, Nixon G, Pregnolato M. Consciousness and Cosmos: building an ontological framework. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2018; 25(3/4): 181-205.

[7]Pereira A Jr, Edwards J, Nunn C, et al. Understanding consciousness: A collaborative attempt to elucidate contemporary theories. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2010; 17(5-6): 213-219.

[8]Nagel T. What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review. 1974; 83(4): 435-450. doi: 10.2307/2183914

[9]Pereira A Jr, Vimal RLP, Pregnolato M. Can Qualitative Physics Solve the Hard Problem? In: Poznanski R, Tuszynski J, Feinberg T (editors). Biophysics of Consciousness: A Foundational Approach. Singapore: World Scientific; 2016.

[10]Gill ML. Aristotle’s Metaphysics Reconsidered. Journal of the History of Philosophy. 2005; 43(3): 223-241. doi: 10.1353/hph.2005.0138

[11]Segalerba G. Semantics and Ontology. Three studies on Aristotle (German). Berne, Switzerland: Peter Lang Bern; 2013.

[12]Chalmers DJ. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 1995; 2(3): 200–219.

[13]Chalmers D. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press; 1996.

[14]Pereira A Jr, Furlan FA. On the role of synchrony for neuron-astrocyte inter-actions and perceptual conscious processing. Journal of Biological Physics. 2009; 35, 465–481. doi: 10.1007/s10867-009-9147-y

[15]Pereira A Jr, Furlan FA. Astrocytes and Human Cognition: modeling information integration and modulation of neuronal activity. Progress in Neurobiology. 2010; 92(3): 405-420. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.07.001

[16]Pereira A Jr. Perceptual Information Integration: hypothetical role of astrocytes. Cognitive Computation. 2012; 4: 51-62. doi: 10.1007/s12559-011-9120-5

[17]Pereira A Jr. Astroglial hydro-ionic waves guided by the extracellular matrix: An exploratory model. Journal of Integrative Neuroscienc. 2017; 16: 1-16.

[18]Pereira A Jr, Aguiar VJ. Sentiomics: The identification and analysis of dynamical patterns that characterize sentience. Journal of Multiscale Neuroscience. 2022; 1: 1-10. doi: 10.56280/1531632254

[19]Pereira A Jr, de Aguiar VJ. Foundations and applications of Sentiomics: the science of the ability to feel (Portuguese). Trans/Form/Ação. 2023; 46: 57-86.

[20]Pereira A Jr, Garcia JW, Muotri A. Neural Stimulation of Brain Organoids with Dynamic Patterns: A Sentiomics Approach Directed to Regenerative Neuromedicine. NeuroSci. 2023; 4(1): 31-42. doi: 10.3390/neurosci4010004

[21]Heidegger M. The Principle of Reason (French). Paris: Gallimard; 1956.

[22]Hume D. Philosophical Essays Concerning Human Understanding, 1st ed. London: A. Millar; 1748.

[23]Aristotle. Metaphysics (French). Paris: Vrin; 1953.

[24]Aristotle. The Complete Aristotle. Available online: www.feedbooks.com/book/4960/the-complete-aristotle (accessed on 21 July 2023).

[25]Guthrie WKC. A History of Greek Philosophy, Vol 6. Aristotle: An Encounter. Reprint edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.

[26]Aubenque P. Aristotle’s problem of being. Essay on the Aristotelian problematic (French). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 1962.

[27]Cassirer E. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Three Volumes. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1957.

[28]Langer SK. Philosophical essays (Portuguese). São Paulo: Editora Cultrix; 1971.

[29]Hartmann N. Metaphysics of Knowledge (Spanish). Buenos Aires: Ed. Losada. Translated from Metaphysik der Erkenntnis; 1957.

[30]Morin E. The Method, Volume 3: The Knowledge of Knowledge (French). Paris: Le Seuil; 2013.

[31]Morin E. The Method, Volume 4: Ideas. Their habitat, their life, their habits, their organization (French). Paris: Le Seuil; 2013.

[32]Lepadatu GV. Early Heidegger’s Transition from Life to Being [PhD thesis]. College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky; 2009.

[33]Crane T. The Origins of Qualia. In: Crane T, Patterson S (editors). The History of the Mind-Body Problem. London: Routledge; 2000.

[34]Pereira A Jr, Foz FB, Rocha AF. The dynamical signature of conscious processing: from modality-specific percepts to complex episodes. Psychology of Consciousness. 2017; 4(2): 230-247. doi: 10.1037/cns0000115

[35]Pereira A Jr. Developing the concepts of homeostasis, homeorhesis, allostasis, elasticity, flexibility and plasticity of brain function. NeuroSci. 2021; 2: 372-382. doi: 10.3390/neurosci2040027

[36]Pereira A Jr. Sentience and Conscious Experience: Feeling Dizzy on a Virtual Reality Roller Coaster Ride. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2021; 28(7-8), 183-198.

[37]Husserl E. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, translated by W. R. Boyce Gibson, New York: Collier Books; 1913.

[38]Damásio A. Descartes’ Error. New York: Grosset/Putnam; 1994.

[39]Damásio A. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt; 1999.

[40]Yannaros C. Post-Modern Metaphysics. Translated by Norman Russell. New York: Holy Cross Orthodox Press; 2004.

[41]Velmans M. Reflexive Monism. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2008; 15(2): 5-50.

[42]Velmans M. Understanding Consciousness. London: Routledge; 2009.

[43]Ursin R, Jennewein T, Aspelmeyer M, et al. Quantum teleportation across the Danube. Nature. 2004; 430(7002): 849-849. doi: 10.1038/430849a

[44]Pereira A Jr, Gudwin R, Pickering W. Systems, Self-Organization and Information: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. London: Routledge; 2019.

[45]Heidegger M. Grundbegriffe der Antiken Philosophie. In: Blust FK (editor). Gesamtausgabe, Abteilung II, Vol. 22. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann; 1993.

[46]Heiddeger M. Ground problems of phenomenology (German). Frankfurt a.M., Klostermann. 1975.

[47]Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of Perception (French). Paris: Gallimard; 1945.

[48]Baldwin JM. Consciousness and Evolution. Psychological Review. 1896; 3(3): 300-309. doi: 10.1037/h0063996

[49]Deacon TW. The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain. New York: W.W. Norton and Co; 1997.

[50]Whitehead AN. Process and Reality. An Essay in Cosmology. Gifford Lectures Delivered in the University of Edinburgh During the Session 1927–1928. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 1929.

[51]Cooper R. Heidegger and Whitehead: A Phenomenological Examination into the Intelligibility of Experience. Athens: Ohio University Press; 1993.

[52]Husserl E. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Paris: Armand Collin; 1931.

[53]Axelos K. The Game of the World. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 1969.

[54]Loux MJ. Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction, 3rd ed. New York/London: Routledge; 2006.

[55]Harris S. Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2015.

[56]Roback AA. History of American Psychology. New York, NY: Library Publishers; 1952.

[57]Marcellos CF, Araujo SF. The Question of Consciousness in Wilhelm Wundt’s Psychology (Portuguese). Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia. 2011; 11(1): 311-332.