Good sense: A philosophical analysis of intuition, epistemology, and practical decision-making
Abstract
This paper delves into the philosophical concept of “good sense,” examining its epistemological foundations, psychological components, and its essential role in practical decision-making. Drawing on a broad spectrum of philosophical thought, this work explores how intuition, folk knowledge, scientific reasoning, and language intertwine to guide human decisions. We argue that “good sense” emerges as a vital tool for survival, particularly when individuals lack complete knowledge and must rely on practical, context-sensitive judgments. The discussion extends to real-world implications, such as decision-making in business, everyday life, and ethics, and how “good sense” shapes our understanding of morality, survival, and communication. This analysis concludes by highlighting the importance of “good sense” in reconciling human knowledge with the unpredictability of the world.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1]Belew A, Fripp R, Gunn Trey, Mastelotto P. King Crimson. Eyes Wide Open. In: The Power to Believe. DGM, CD; 2003.
[2]Aristóteles. Ética a Nicômaco. Antonio Pinto de Carvalho. In: Coleção Os Pensadores. São Paulo: Abril Cultural; 1973.
[3]Confúcio. Os Analectos. André Bueno. São Paulo: Edipro; 2011.
[4]Geertz C. The Interpretation of Cultures (Portuguese). Rio de Janeiro: LTC; 2008.
[5]Al-Attas SMN. The Concept of Education in Islam: A Framework for an Islamic Philosophy of Education. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC; 1991.
[6]Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press; 1962.
[7]Popper K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge; 1934.
[8]Nagel E. The Philosophy of Science. Harper & Row; 1958.
[9]Bergson H. Creative Evolution. New York: Henry Holt and Company; 1907.
[10]Roger A. Pierre Duhem. Available online: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/duhem/ (accessed on 12 December 2024).
[11]Shaw J. Duhem on Good Sense and Theory Pursuit: From Virtue to Social Epistemology. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 2020; 33(2): 67-85. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2021.1888191
[12]Ivanova M. Pierre Duhem’s good sense as a guide to theory choice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2010; 41(1): 58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.12.009
[13]Ivanova M, Paternotte C. Theory Choice, Good Sense and Social Consensus. Erkenntnis. 2012; 78(5): 1109-1132. doi: 10.1007/s10670-012-9390-7
[14]Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell; 1953.
[15]Hegel GWF. Phenomenology of Spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.
[16]Nietzche F. The Birth of Tragedy and the Case of Wagner (W. Kaufmann, Trans. & Ed.). New York: Vintage Books. 1967.
[17]Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011.
[18]Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason (N. Kemp Smith, Trans.). London: Macmillan (Original work published 1781); 1929.
[19]Crane G. Intuition: The “Unseen Thread” Connecting Emerson and James. Modern Intellectual History. 2013; 10(1): 57-86. doi: 10.1017/s1479244312000340
[20]Grice HP. Logic and Conversation. Syntax and Semantics. 1975; 3: 41-58.
[21]Austin JL. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press; 1962.
[22]de Souza EBR. The Philosophy Behind the Conversation: Implicatures and the Indirect Speech Acts. Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; 2023. doi: 10.1590/2176-4573e58270
[23]Yüksel S, Eti S, Dinçer H, et al. Innovative financial solutions for sustainable investments using artificial intelligence-based hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach in carbon capture technologies. Financial Innovation. 2025; 11(1). doi: 10.1186/s40854-024-00671-x
[24]Yüksel S, Eti S, Dinçer H, et al. A novel fuzzy decision-making approach to pension fund investments in renewable energy. Financial Innovation. 2025; 11(1). doi: 10.1186/s40854-024-00703-6
[25]Rawls J. Uma Teoria da Justiça. Trad. Álvaro de A. M. Pires. São Paulo: Martins Fontes; 2002.
[26]Gramsci A. Prison Notebooks (Portuguese). Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira. 2000; 1.
[27]Bourdieu POPS. Trad. Fernando Tomaz. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil; 2011.
[28]O’Neil C. Algorithms of mass destruction: how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy (Portuguese). São Paulo: Editora Rua do Sabão; 2020.
