Ideal personality of Confucian thoughts and its contemporary relevance for education
Abstract
Amidst significant transformations in both domestic and international contexts, as well as profound changes in China’s economy and society, numerous challenges persist in the realm of social morality, with social values becoming increasingly pluralistic. This paper seeks to examine the historical evolution of the connotation of the Confucian ideal of personality, explore its contemporary relevance and practical applications, and provide theoretical support for the creative transformation and innovative development of China’s rich traditional culture. By doing so, it aims to contribute to the enrichment and refinement of the core socialist values with Chinese characteristics, offer a cultural foundation for these endeavors, and propose an ideal personality model aligned with contemporary requirements to strengthen the moral construction of citizens. Drawing from the theories of Confucius, Mencius, and Xunzi on the ideal of personality, this paper delves into the historical evolution of the Confucian concept of ideal personality, with a particular focus on the theoretical interpretation of the principle of being “inner sagehood and outer kingship”. It systematically traces the historical development of Confucian personality theory, highlights the alignment between traditional Chinese cultural values and the core values of socialism, and investigates the integration of Confucian ideals of personality with the practical demands of contemporary civic morality.
References
[1]Zhuang T, Kong X. Shaping personal worldviews when neo-liberalism meets Confucianism and patriotism: Insights from Chinese postgraduate students. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 2023; 1–16.
[2]Ames RT. A Conceptual Lexicon for Classical Confucian Philosophy. State University of New York Press; 2022.
[3]Zhuang T, Xu X. Is “Application” Everything about Studying for a University Degree? The Multiple Influences Shaping Undergraduates in Chinese Higher Education in Contemporary Times. Beijing International Review of Education. 2024; 6(3–4), 310–333.
[4]Marginson S. Higher education in East Asia and Singapore: Rise of the Confucian model. Higher Education. 2011; 61: 587–611.
[5]Gu P. Research on the Value of Confucianism and the Construction of Socialist Core Values. Southeast University; 2016.
[6]Fei Y. Confucius Ideal Personality and the Research on Its Modern Values. Shandong Normal University; 2010.
[7]Shi T. On Confucius and Lao Tzu's Moral Education Thought Based on Ideal Personality Construction and Its Modern Value. Journal of Shandong Youth University of Political Science; 2019
[8]Billioud S, Thoraval J. The sage and the people: The Confucian revival in China. Oxford University Press; 2015.
[9]Lee Y-Y. The narrative of the Junzi as an exemplar in classical confucianism and its implications for moral and character education. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2020; 53(6): 634–643.
[10]Hu X. A Study on Confucius” Philosophy of Junzi (The Gentle Person) in The Analects. California Institute of Integral Studies. 1996.
[11]Zhang Q, Zhang Q. The evolution of ancient Chinese thought. An Introduction to Chinese History and Culture. 2015; 283–317.
[12]Xu K. Ren Xing: Mencian’s understanding of human being and human becoming. Dialogue and Universalism. 2015; 2: 29–39.
[13]Hutton EL. Xunzi: The complete text. Princeton University Press; 2016.
[14]Tan C. Confucianism and education. In: Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press; 2017.
[15]Tan C. Confucian philosophy for contemporary education. Routledge. 2020.
[16]Truong TD, Hallinger P, Sanga K. Confucian values and school leadership in Vietnam: Exploring the influence of culture on principal decision making. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2017; 45(1): 77–100.
[17]Wu Y. The Flower of Nourishing Moral Education from the Beauty of Words Hua—A New Case Study of Chinese Excellent Traditional Culture Entering Campus. 2019; 07: 32–34.
[18]Guo X, Krempl S, Marinova D. Economic prosperity and sustainability in China: Seeking wisdom from Confucianism and Taoism. Technology, Society and Sustainability: Selected Concepts, Issues and Cases. 2017; 263–273.
[19]Kaufmann LJ, Danner-Schröder A. Addressing grand challenges through different forms of organizing: A literature review. Organizing for Societal Grand Challenges. 2022; 163–186.
[20]Brennan A, Fan R. Autonomy and Interdependence: A Dialogue between Liberalism and Confucianism. Journal of Social Philosophy. 2007; 38(4).
[21]Sim M. Confucianism and Transgenerational Grounds for Justice. The Monist. 2023; 106(2): 181–193.
Copyright (c) 2024 Yinuo Zhou, Tengteng Zhuang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.